cal04
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 06:36 PM
Original message |
Developing on Rawstory:Judge orders feeding tube reinserted |
|
No link so I couldn't post on Latest Breaking http://www.rawstory.com/
|
Bunny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 06:38 PM
Response to Original message |
cal04
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. they must know something at Rawstory |
|
Edited on Mon Mar-21-05 06:40 PM by cal04
I wouldn't doubt it was true I don't think they would go to all the trouble and NOT know this judge would rule for them. I wouldn't doubt if he was either hand picked or threatened.
|
Goldeneye
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. He can't be all bad...he's a Clinton appointee. |
|
Edited on Mon Mar-21-05 06:43 PM by Goldeneye
Also, I posted this a few minutes ago and someone said Drudge put the same heading up and then pulled it. I can't remember a time when rawstory was wrong...but I guess we'll see.
|
ET Awful
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 06:42 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Unless all the attorneys were called back to court, I don't buy it. |
|
Court was adjourned for the day with no decision being handed down by the judge.
|
glaucon
(116 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 06:48 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The "developing" headline on this is not there now...
|
CottonBear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 06:51 PM
Response to Original message |
6. What if she dies before the judge can rule? |
|
The fundies will go crazy.
|
rzemanfl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. The Republicans will pass a law bringing her back to life. n/t |
zanne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
Why not? The Red Sox won the world series, for Pete's sake!
|
Verve
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. If I was the judge I'd take a lengthy time deliberating the case. It would |
|
be best if she did die before he ruled.
|
ChiciB1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. I Think If He's Smart... |
|
this is the BEST solution. After all, the case hase been reviewed, re-reviewed, viewed and everything else, ad infinitum!
I don't mean to sound callous, but right now... I'm SICK of it!
And her husband has been made out to be some kind of Texas Chain Saw Murderer! He can't change anything now anyway, other courts have already RULED!
|
aint_no_life_nowhere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 07:58 PM
Response to Original message |
10. I think it would be normal for a judge to preserve the status quo |
|
(the object of the legal controversy) pending the outcome. But this case is anything but normal.
|
saracat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 08:25 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Hey. My Dad was a judge, and whenever he used the tem this judge is |
|
using"taking it under advisement, it meant he was blowing you off! I don't think he is going to decide at ALL. If he does, I don't think it will be in the parents favor. He is not going to contest nineteen fellow judges and the Supreme Court, who wouldn't hear this case! Even Scalia says Congress was wrong. Sean Hannity was saying on the radio, I heard it accidently in someone elses car, that Congress shouldn't knuckle under to Judges. That viewpoint will not play well. This is a raw power grap and concerns the seperation of powers. They have just stepped on the courts. The Courts will fight back. I am certain of it.
|
ElectroPrincess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. "Even Scalia says Congress was wrong." |
|
Damn, that's novel! I'm off to pop some corn and watch the show ;).
|
Logansquare
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
15. Thanks for your perspective. I wish the MSM could "get" this |
|
Our democracy is dependent on the corrective stress that exists between the three branches; separation is essential. The neo-cons want a universal power-grab--the Schiavo case is just an attempt to weaken the courts, which haven't been sufficiently doctrinaire for their taste. The fucking "press" or "infotainment industry" or whatever the hell they are today, seems to be incapable of sounding the alarm on this.
|
cal04
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 09:58 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Judge mulls Schiavo; TV claim of ruling premature |
Boo Boo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-05 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
Rawstory gets their news from TV!
Developing...
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 13th 2024, 08:44 AM
Response to Original message |