Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chafee will vote for Bolton Nomination

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 06:39 AM
Original message
Chafee will vote for Bolton Nomination
Edited on Fri Apr-08-05 06:41 AM by Leilani
no link...just heard on C-Span Wash Journal, according to Vaugh Ververs of the Hotline.

He reported that Condoleeza Rice talked to him personally, & assured him Bolton will work for her, & foreign policy will be less confrontational.

IMO, the Kerry call to push Chafee might have backfired. If I was a Senator, I wouldn't want a colleague interfering between myself & my constituents & pressuring me on an important decision.

I thought it was heavy handed, but didn't voice my opinion at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's all lies, they want to destroy the UN and they hired the right guy
to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I agree with that.
Just disagreed with strategy to deal with Chafee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. That would have surprised me
Of course, Chafee not being able to do the right thing is Kerry's fault. Is it not nice!

It would say it has to do with the 06 election. Now that Chafee has a bona fide liberal against him, he needs to give alledgance to the right wing to avoid a primary fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. No, my point is
when you publicize something, like was done to Chafee, you put him a in a funny spot. Remember, he is STILL a Republican.

And I've found he makes some good decisions...he voted against the IWR.

Sometimes a subtle approach is more effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. considering he voted for Rice and especially Gonzales
i don't think he would have done differently with this.

but a Democrat will run against him in 2006 with backing from the Party so he wont be around much longer anyways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Whitehouse running put him in a hard position
Edited on Fri Apr-08-05 06:57 AM by Mass
With Brown running against him, he was nearly assured of his reelection just with Democrats voting for him. With Whitehouse running, he needs all Republicans votes.
Anyway, I am not surprised. As soon as the BG reported he could vote against Chafee, his aids started to say it was not so. They chickened out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Of course his own race involved in this.
There were several articles posted here about the calls & emails to him. He even spoke publically about the messages he had gotten.

Therefore, he's put in the spotlight, & he's almost forced to vote for Bolton because he has to maintain SOME Republican credibility.

This is just my opinion, & you are of course free to disagree.

But I find that Kerry has a political tin ear. His last debate was a perfect example. Edwards had already made a point about Mary Cheney during his debate. Why did Kerry need to mention it again? It sounded mean spirited, & hurt his public image, even though he won on debating points.

I could list a bunch of incidents, but I'll limit it to 1 example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. OK you made your point
Let me disagree with you on both counts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. I don't understand RI dems
Edited on Fri Apr-08-05 08:02 AM by paineinthearse
Why can't the dems run a successful campaign against Chaffee? His clame to fame is a family name. Big deal.

There are hundreds of Mass volunteers willing to travel south to help the cause, are you listening, Mr. Johnson?

A moderate rethug is still a rethug and is not a "good" thing.

DU can help. If you have freiends and family in RI, tell them about the RI forum. It is terribly underused - last post was 24 hours ago; 214 total posts).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. They have to run Dems that are more liberal than he is.
I hope that Whitehouse will prove to be that way and win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. i think using the national Republican party against Chafee is pretty smart
he already brought up Tom Delay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rooboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Politically speaking, you're probably right...
but we've gone so far into the abyss now that even Chafee should realize that letting these bastards progress any further might destroy the USA and more. It's time to fundamentally make the right choices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. If true, there goes my respect for him.
So much for conviction, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
10. Here is the Providence Journal article relating to that
http://www.projo.com/news/content/projo_20050408_chafee8.24fb490.html

As a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, his vote may determine whether John Bolton becomes the U.S. envoy to the United Nations.

01:00 AM EDT on Friday, April 8, 2005

BY SCOTT MacKAY
Journal Staff Writer

PROVIDENCE -- Sen. Lincoln D. Chafee says he will vote to confirm John Bolton -- a staunch conservative and President Bush's choice -- as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations unless some significant new anti-Bolton information surfaces during a Senate hearing next week.


As a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, his vote may determine whether John Bolton becomes the U.S. envoy to the United Nations.


Chafee called the opposition "organized" and said he has received many telephone calls, e-mail messages and letters. "You take every phone call and e-mail and letter seriously," Chafee said. "I don't want to minimize how Rhode Islanders feel about this. I'm listening."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Thanks for this post!
Edited on Fri Apr-08-05 07:09 AM by Leilani
It proves my point!

The opposition was "organized."

I know when I'm pressured by someone, it pisses me off, & it sometimes affects my decision, & backfires on the person who pressured me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Before the calls, Chafee had said he would vote FOR Bolton
Edited on Fri Apr-08-05 07:18 AM by Mass
After the opposition, he said for a few hours he would vote AGAINST Bolton because this was what his constituents wanted, and, as I understand it, after Rice called, he decided otherwise.

I think he caved to the pressure of Republicans threatening to run somebody against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. That makes no sense.
If the Repubs run a more conservative challenger to Chafee in the primary, they lose the seat. They'd rather keep Chafee even though he bolts on some votes.

In Pennsylvania, the WH backed Specter against a more conservative challenger. The fundies are still angry about that, but the WH has said they will defend all incumbents.

The Repubs can count, & their strategies, though slimy, have been effective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. It is still a very effective threat
Edited on Fri Apr-08-05 07:59 AM by Mass
Chafee had always said he was leaning towards confirming Bolton, except for a few days after the calls were made.

This is not a surprise for most people in NE that he would end voting party line on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. Look at the whole sentence
Yes, the opposition is organized - and it likely would NOT have occured if it were not! - but the rest of the sentence shows that he is taking it into consideration to some degree. As MASS said before the Kerry effort, Chafee had indicated that he would likely vote to confirm.

For most people, Bolton is NOT known and who the UN representative is is not a question that excites them. For the last few years, there has been an implicit threat to Liberal/Moderate Republicans that if they don't toe the line, they will be challanged in the primaries. The Republicans are in a stronger position to do this now than they were last year, so the threat to Chafee is there. The opposition has at least caused the issue to surface enough that Chafee has to consider that if he votes with the administration on this bill there will be political consequences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. I don't blame Kerry for hammering hard on Bolton, it makes sense for him
since Bolton was so obstructionist during Iran/Contra. I don't get the feeling Kerry is terribly fond of the man. He seems more antagonistic toward Bolton than Negreponte. I wonder why. Both were involved in that time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. I don't understand
Should we not be organized? Action alerts not a good thing? I'm not sure we can wait for spontaneous action.

Eh, damned if ya do, damned if you don't.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Of course we should be organized
but some situations call for some finesse.

When Jeffords left the Republicans it was a huge surprise. Nobody knew the Dems were working quietly behind the scenes to lure him.

If he had been targeted publicly by Dems, bet he wouldn't have jumped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #28
38. Kerry is on the committee and obviously knows Chafee well
I would suspect that they or their staffs have talked to some degree about his position. His stated position has become less firmly "yes", so I think that over-all the effort has been positive. Kerry (correctly, I think) feels this nominee is very bad and thinks if he can get the word out to people in Delaware how bad he is they will be a force balancing out the Republican stay in line effort.

I have yet to see even one Republican vote no on a nominee this year. In this case you have a state with a relatively liberal population and a moderate Senator. Stimulating the population to ask that he represent his state and vote against a very RW extremist doesn't sound bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. I completely understand your point
And I would hope the Dems are working behind the scenes on Chafee.

My post opined that Chafee is in a box, & airing all this publicly may be less effective, because it then pits him very openly against his own party. It may force him into their arms.

Let's face it, moderates of either party are dead meat these days.
Repubs target Dems, Dems target Repubs.

I grew up in a time when both parties had liberals & conservatives, & I liked it that way.

The country was much more unified, & politics was not a Bloodsport.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. I think I may have grown up in the same time period
I first followed politics in the early 60s when I was about 10- 12 years old.I think that it really did make things work better when the parties weren't so polarized. If you look at the Senate that Kerry spoke to in 1971, there were not only liberals on both sides, but there were also anti-war proponents on both sides. The idea of lock step following a party line was not there. Even more impressively when the Watergate info really came out there were many Republicans who did not fight to protect Nixon.

I do understand your concern and think on a more high visibility item, say SS reform I agree with you. But I think that over the last several years, most people do not write their congress people. In particular, Democrats have lost so much so often that we need to develop some kind of grassroots organization and to stay alert. We don't really have that now, so I think various people (Kerry is only one of them) are trying to deal with this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmcon007 Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
13. Yeah, let's believe Condi. That's the ticket! Will we ever learn?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
m_welby Donating Member (508 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
21. That is disappointing
I was hoping my senator would do the right thing on this one.

Linc is on the ropes as it is, no matter what he does he is targeted by the dems in RI. I like his independence and I respect his breed of republican, but the dems need to take back the senate and his seat should be an easy grab.

There is a tradition in RI that we have one senator from each party, and usually both quite admirable (See the records of Claiborne Pell(D) and John Chafee (R)), but I don't think Lincoln will survive this one, he won last election as the son of his father, he needs to win the next election on his own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
23. Well damn. I am struggling to find that high card in --
-- the deck for Lincoln Chafee, but he makes it harder each time he does something like this.

Bolton is a monstrous asshole from the Jesse Helms Swamp Disease division of the Republican Party.

This is a vote that ought to be real clear on the points.

I can't speak to Chafee's political instincts -- would need help from RI DUers there -- but I wish he'd switch to the Dems and stop this balancing act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safi0 Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. If Daschle, Bowles, Carson
Tenenbaum and Castor or some other mix of 5 Dem. Seantors had won there election or in Daschle's case re-election I'm almost certain Chaffee would have defected. The reason he didn't was because why would he switch to a party that was deeply the minority party. Giving up things like Committe positions and things like that. I bet Chaffee was hoping the Dems. would take back the Senate because from his perspective it would be the best of both worlds, he gets to remain a member of the majority party, but perhaps more importantly would cruise to re-election, unlike whats likely to happen which is Chaffee being involved in a dogfight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Hi, SafiO. Yes. That's my take also, although I didn't --
-- get it in the big picture version you have it.

I appreciate your post. I want to like Chafee more than Republicans like Martinez, Coburn, Stevens, etc. but he keeps kowtowing to his party.

At moments like these I kind of get homesick for Claiborne Pell!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safi0 Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. As good as Collins, Snowe and Chaffee
can be there still Repubs. Especially in Chaffee's case he faces a tough re-election soon. He knows that hes gotta turn out Repubs. as well as win over some moderate Dems. Personally, I do like the guy do I wish hed switch over, absolutely, but I also understand why he didn't. Whether or not I agree with it is another story but I understand why he did what he did.

Personally though I don't care how moderate the guy is hes still a vote for Frist as Majority Leader, to me that alone is enough reason to go after him. For those who know how the Senate operates know how much different it is to be the majority part then the minority party. For example I can almost gurantee if we were the majoity party right now Alberto Gonzales would not be AG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Have to agree on all points.
Is Whitehouse liberal enough and/or appealing enough to defeat Chafee?

I'm with you all the way on your point on Gonzales, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safi0 Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. I haven't the slightest clue about Whitehouse
All I know is hes got a really cool name and if he ran for Pres. someday he could have some great stump speeches. I don't live in RI, so I really have no idea about anything about the guy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. He DOES have a pretty cool name.
I couldn't believe my eyes when I read that he had announced for the race.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Here is the Providence Journal article announcing his bid
http://www.projo.com/news/content/projo_20050405_sheldon5.23d583f.html

Langevin, when he renounced to run, had suggested that Brown should quit the race too and let the place to either Kennedy or Whitehouse. I dont know a lot about Brown, but he is quite young (35), and though he is the sitting SoS, he does not seem to have a great job satisfaction (though I am not sure why).

From what I heard about WhiteHouse, he is a good solid liberal in RI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Hey Mass, thank you for that article. I hope Whitehouse --
-- has some good fortune, since Chafee seems reluctant to bolt his party. Politics are politics, I guess, and I'd rather have a pretty liberal Democrat than a pretty moderate Republican.

'appreciate your extra steps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Don't forget Mongiardo in Kentucky
who almost pulled a huge upset.

And he was not a happy camper, because he said he got no help from the Dems....he was sure he would have won with a little assistance.

That race was a real shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safi0 Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. I was just naming
Off Five Dems who were in close races. I left off the guy who ran in Alaska too, forgot his name, plus the LA senate seat was a seat that they had a shot at too.

I was talking to some people about the KY race and they said the reason Mongiardo didn't receive any funding was that, that was a seat that wasn't really considered winnable. Everyone thought Bunning would just ride Dubya's coattails to another term and they were right for a long time. It wasn't until Bunning started doing some real weird shit that the race really tightened up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Agreed. Everyone thought Mongiardo was a long shot
However, as time went on & the race became closer & closer, I wish the Dems had helped him. There was time, but they blew him off.

Lots of races were close; with Kentucky, a few dollars would have won the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveConn Donating Member (820 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
40. Mr. Chafee seems to actively want to lose his job.
Thank you Mr. Chafee for making your seat less secure with every day you go along with this crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC