Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could someone explain the judicial nominee thing to me one more time?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 06:53 PM
Original message
Could someone explain the judicial nominee thing to me one more time?
I understand the 200 vs only 10 judges being blocked, which means that Bush is doing pretty well in that regard.

But what level of the judiciary is that?

Also, I saw on one of the cable news channels that at a lower judicial level, about 40 percent of Bush's nominees had been blocked, giving him about a 60 percent success rate, admittedly not so good.

What level of the judiciary could they be talking about? Was that the appellate courts?

Any info appreciated.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dems are focusing on blocking Dubya's ideological circuit court nominees.
Edited on Mon Apr-18-05 07:25 PM by flpoljunkie
Circuit courts are where most federal case law is made as the Supreme Court takes only about 80-90 cases a year on appeal. The actual number of judges confirmed is now 205 with only 10 not having been confirmed.

Read this from Senator Byron Dorgan's website:

http://democrats.senate.gov/dpc/dpc-doc.cfm?doc_name=fs-108-2-197
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Here's a link
I don't know what they're trying to spin.

Dec 2000 67 vacancies, 39 pending nominations
Dec 2004 29 vacancies, 20 pending nominations

Pretty clear who has been the most cooperative.

http://www.uscourts.gov/vacancies/archives.cfm#2000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I think it was CNN
so you can imagine what that "liberal" station was trying to spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-05 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Here's a good article from Los Angeles Times...
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002244587_judges18.html

Analysis

Battle over judges foreshadows Supreme Court clashes to come

By David G. Savage
Los Angeles Times


WASHINGTON — The looming battle over President Bush's nominees to the U.S. appeals courts might derail the Senate, but it may not make much difference in the federal courts. That's because Republican appointees already dominate them.

Ninety-four of the 162 active judges now on U.S. appeals courts were chosen by Republican presidents. On 10 of the 13 circuit courts, Republican appointees have a clear majority. And, since 1976, at least seven of the nine seats on the U.S. Supreme Court have been filled by Republican appointees.

Even if President Bush wins approval for the dozen disputed nominees who have been blocked by Senate Democrats, only one circuit would shift its ideological balance: The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati, now evenly divided, would become 10-6 Republican. That would give Republicans a majority on 11 of the 13 circuits versus the current 10 of 13.

Although it remains a staple of conservative rhetoric that the courts are "out of control" and driven by "liberal activists," the GOP's control of the White House for 24 of the past 36 years has given Republicans — if not conservatives — a firm grip on the federal judiciary.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC