Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Carl Bernstein's remarks on the media losing the public trust.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 01:50 PM
Original message
Carl Bernstein's remarks on the media losing the public trust.
Edited on Wed Apr-20-05 01:51 PM by flpoljunkie
Daily Howler pointed out this recent Carl Bernstein speech in his post today. Pay particular attention to the first audio link: "On how journalists can best serve the public good." It is dead on!

Kudos to Carl Bernstein and to Bob Somerby of http://www.dailyhowler.com for bringing this to our attention!

http://www.ljworld.com/section/citynews/storypr/202103

Watergate journalist says media losing public's trust

By Dave Ranney, Journal-World

Saturday, April 16, 2005

One of the nation's most renowned journalists on Friday accused his profession of squandering the public trust.

"You can't serve the public good without the truth as a bottom line," said Carl Bernstein, the former Washington Post reporter who, along with Bob Woodward, broke and covered the Watergate scandal, which resulted in the resignation of President Richard Nixon.


Too often, Bernstein said, the ever-escalating quest for profits has replaced the profession's obligation to seek "the best obtainable version of the truth."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cybildisobedience Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bernstein's principled stand is commendable.
Shame we haven't seen the same thing from Woodward, who has used his post-Watergate fame to pen valentines to Bush.
Bernstein really gets it -- and he always did. I remember him during the whole impeachment fiasco. He was the lone voice of sanity on many of the pundit-fests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. He's a real journalist, a dying breed--utterly tragic for our democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. And he exposed Operation Mockingbird. Every bit as important news as
Watergate, but it didn't lead to any change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Bravo, glitch, the media needs to police itself ! Read post #7
Edited on Wed Apr-20-05 03:26 PM by EVDebs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Montauk6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Because Woodward moonlights as Bill Kristol?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fifth of Five Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Oh my god!
Attack of the Clones!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Please see post #7 , you'll love it !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
necso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Great piece.
Where it's Bernstein, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. His October 1977 "CIA and the Media" in Rolling Stone needs updating
Edited on Wed Apr-20-05 03:28 PM by EVDebs
Also needs to be put onto the web in full 'for public domain' if possible. All 17 pages of it need fully updated. Proprietaries possibly inclued media entities now...

Plus his buddy Robert Woodward deserves a real look-see ! Seems he was either used by (now Sen.) Robert F. Bennett during Watergate or he needs to clarify things re Deep Throat. Come clean Bob !

Deep Throat
A few more thoughts about Watergate
By Bob Harris
www.metroactive.com/papers/sonoma/07.03.97/scoop-9727.html

""What's missing is an understanding of Deep Throat, Woodward's garage-lurking source who guided the reporters to some of their biggest leads. If he was just a concerned citizen, great. But if Deep Throat had his own agenda, then he used the Washington Post to shape the story for his own purposes and got away clean.

"I have told Woodward everything I know about the Watergate case, except the Mullen Company's tie to the CIA."--Robert F. Bennett, testifying before House Special Committee on Intelligence, July 2, 1974.

Robert Bennett was the head of Robert R. Mullen and Co., a CIA front headquartered in the very same building as the CIA's Domestic Operations Division. The Mullen Co. did legitimate PR work; it also did PR for other CIA fronts and provided cover abroad for CIA operations. Bennett's most notable employee was Howard Hunt, a former chief of covert actions for the Domestic Operations Division of the CIA.""

Bennett is now Senator from UT (shades of Bluto Blutarsky from Animal House, huh ?)...CIA domestic operations ???

and the Probe article on Bob Woodward re Lt. j.g. Woodward's intell connections, also mentioned in the book Secret Agenda by Jim Hougan, deserves a look
www.webcom.com/ctka/pr196-woodward.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnOneillsMemory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. CIA steered corporate media for the last 60 years. PASS IT ON.
The theme of the 'liberal media' is actually the CIA's biggest cover story. They have controlled what Americans think of the White House and permanent war for decades.

Here's the single most important article I know to explain who controls what in America and how we got this fucked up:

http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-overclass.html
(The Origins of the Overclass, by Steve Kangas)

The Media

Journalism is a perfect cover for CIA agents. People talk freely to journalists, and few think suspiciously of a journalist aggressively searching for information. Journalists also have power, influence and clout. Not surprisingly, the CIA began a mission in the late 1940s to recruit American journalists on a wide scale, a mission it dubbed Operation MOCKINGBIRD. The agency wanted these journalists not only to relay any sensitive information they discovered, but also to write anti-communist, pro-capitalist propaganda when needed.

The instigators of MOCKINGBIRD were Frank Wisner, Allan Dulles, Richard Helms and Philip Graham. Graham was the husband of Katherine Graham, today’s publisher of the Washington Post. In fact, it was the Post’s ties to the CIA that allowed it to grow so quickly after the war, both in readership and influence. (8)

MOCKINGBIRD was extraordinarily successful. In no time, the agency had recruited at least 25 media organizations to disseminate CIA propaganda. At least 400 journalists would eventually join the CIA payroll, according to the CIA’s testimony before a stunned Church Committee in 1975. (The committee felt the true number was considerably higher.) The names of those recruited reads like a Who's Who of journalism:

* Philip and Katharine Graham (Publishers, Washington Post)
* William Paley (President, CBS)
* Henry Luce (Publisher, Time and Life magazine)
* Arthur Hays Sulzberger (Publisher, N.Y. Times)
* Jerry O'Leary (Washington Star)
* Hal Hendrix (Pulitzer Prize winner, Miami News)
* Barry Bingham Sr., (Louisville Courier-Journal)
* James Copley (Copley News Services)
* Joseph Harrison (Editor, Christian Science Monitor)
* C.D. Jackson (Fortune)
* Walter Pincus (Reporter, Washington Post)
* ABC
* NBC
* Associated Press
* United Press International
* Reuters
* Hearst Newspapers
* Scripps-Howard
* Newsweek
* magazine Mutual Broadcasting System
* Miami Herald
* Old Saturday Evening Post
* New York Herald-Tribune

Perhaps no newspaper is more important to the CIA than the Washington Post, one of the nation’s most right-wing dailies. Its location in the nation’s capitol enables the paper to maintain valuable personal contacts with leading intelligence, political and business figures. Unlike other newspapers, the Post operates its own bureaus around the world, rather than relying on AP wire services. Owner Philip Graham was a military intelligence officer in World War II, and later became close friends with CIA figures like Frank Wisner, Allen Dulles, Desmond FitzGerald and Richard Helms. He inherited the Post by marrying Katherine Graham, whose father owned it.

After Philip’s suicide in 1963, Katharine Graham took over the Post. Seduced by her husband’s world of government and espionage, she expanded her newspaper’s relationship with the CIA. In a 1988 speech before CIA officials at Langley, Virginia, she stated:

We live in a dirty and dangerous world. There are some things that the general public does not need to know and shouldn’t. I believe democracy flourishes when the government can take legitimate steps to keep its secrets and when the press can decide whether to print what it knows.

This quote has since become a classic among CIA critics for its belittlement of democracy and its admission that there is a political agenda behind the Post’s headlines.

Ben Bradlee was the Post’s managing editor during most of the Cold War. He worked in the U.S. Paris embassy from 1951 to 1953, where he followed orders by the CIA station chief to place propaganda in the European press. (9) Most Americans incorrectly believe that Bradlee personifies the liberal slant of the Post, given his role in publishing the Pentagon Papers and the Watergate investigations. But neither of these two incidents are what they seem. The Post merely published the Pentagon Papers after The New York Times already had, because it wanted to appear competitive. As for Watergate, we’ll examine the CIA’s reasons for wanting to bring down Nixon in a moment. Someone once asked Bradlee: "Does it irk you when The Washington Post is made out to be a bastion of slanted liberal thinkers instead of champion journalists just because of Watergate?" Bradlee responded: "Damn right it does!" (10)

It would be impossible to elaborate in this short space even the most important examples of the CIA/media alliance. Sig Mickelson was a CIA asset the entire time he was president of CBS News from 1954 to 1961. Later he went on to become president of Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty, two major outlets of CIA propaganda.

The CIA also secretly bought or created its own media companies. It owned 40 percent of the Rome Daily American at a time when communists were threatening to win the Italian elections. Worse, the CIA has bought many domestic media companies. A prime example is Capital Cities, created in 1954 by CIA businessman William Casey (who would later become Reagan’s CIA director). Another founder was Lowell Thomas, a close friend and business contact with CIA Director Allen Dulles. Another founder was CIA businessman Thomas Dewey. By 1985, Capital Cities had grown so powerful that it was able to buy an entire TV network: ABC.

For those who believe in "separation of press and state," the very idea that the CIA has secret propaganda outlets throughout the media is appalling. The reason why America was so oblivious to CIA crimes in the 40s and 50s was because the media willingly complied with the agency. Even today, when the immorality of the CIA should be an open-and-shut case, "debate" about the issue rages in the media. Here is but one example:

In 1996, The San Jose Mercury News published an investigative report suggesting that the CIA had sold crack in Los Angeles to fund the Contra war in Central America. A month later, three of the CIA’s most important media allies — The Washington Post, The New York Times and The Los Angeles Times — immediately leveled their guns at the Mercury report and blasted away in an attempt to discredit it. Who wrote the Post article? Walter Pincus, longtime CIA journalist. The dangers here are obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Nepotism seems to play a role in subsequent books etc dealing with
'The Company'. Des Fitzgerald's daughter writes a history of Vietnam war called Fire In The Lake.

Ambassador Graham A. Martin (Thailand, Italy, So. Vietnam)
Martin was very involved in the drug and off-Congressional-funding money system, also a friend of WashPost's Ben Bradlee.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. This sure would explain a lot of things......like
the media's complete lack of interest in the 9/11 story and no significant investigations into the electronic voting issue, etc. ETC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Kangas and Webb both "suicides" Just a coincidence, I am sure. nt
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. Bernstein had a cooperative editor & paper owner in his day......
or we wouldn't know much about his Watergate and other work, I'm guessing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. CB: "The bottom line today is the bottom line, not truth nor public good"
"Ideology, greed, plutocracy, government for plutocrats, oligraphy and media, as well, serve the interests of ideology and profit at the expense of truth and the public good." - Carl Bernstein

Bravo! I love it when a journalist speaks truth to power!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Kick it. One more vote gets 'greatest page' BTW !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. MNA May 2 2005: A day to reflect on the failure to pursue truth....
....www.missionnotaccomplished.us (a day to reflect on all the atrocities committed by liar Bu$h and his theocratic neoconster buddies)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I disagree. It is not always easy to get at the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-21-05 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
20. I don't think big media understands the concept of truth anymore
They make sh*t up; they get things wrong and don't correct them; they pass over important news to focus on fluff; and they think that a prettier or more obnoxious talking head is the way to win the public's attention.

Moreso even than the Republicans, the media IS the problem. In fact, moreso even than the Republicans, I think the media IS the enemy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC