O'Reilly celebrates "The Comeback of President Bush"

[Bush_Eats_Beef]

The Comeback of President Bush
Monday, September 19, 2005
By Bill O'Reilly

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,169773,00.html

Mostly positive reviews for the president's speech last night, even from unfriendly sources. Mr. Bush delivered big money promises, hope, and some contrition. I thought the speech was well written.

As we demonstrated a few days ago, the Bush administration is spending far more on the poor than any other administration in history, much more than Bill Clinton did. If you want the stats, please read my column on billoreilly.com.

Jackson's propaganda, of course, rarely challenged by the press, generally let him say anything he wants to say. And he'll do anything to denigrate Mr. Bush.

Now the danger is that 300 million Americans are living in a country where objectivity and fair play have pretty much disappeared in the media. So how are we supposed to know the truth about events and people? The press is supposed to be our eyes and ears. But increasingly, the media has turned into a nasty partisan group of ideologues. And if you disagree with them, you're going to get personally attacked. Reuters should be ashamed of itself.

[TheCowsCameHome]

1. Another good reason to drug test talk show hosts.

Can you believe this asswipe?

[Skittles]

5. yeah, I can believe it - O'Reilly's number one purpose is Bush Whore

second purpose is being a falafel/loofah whore; you just know old Bill get's all tingly when he types the words "President Bush".

[MsAnthropy]

2. What planet is he on today?

I get it--it's "Opposite Day"!!!!

[BloodyWilliam]

3. Three words: DETATCHED FROM REALITY.

Even the Freepers were pissing themselves over Bush's faux-LBJ schtick!

[indepat]

19. The idolatrous throngs still chant their praises, ala O'Leilly

[Guy Whitey Corngood]

4. Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz ................. n/t

[mahatmakanejeeves]

6. "The Comeback of President Bush"

The drain pipe underneath the toilet is stopped up again, I see.

[roguevalley]

7. he's just giddy over his latest peabody. ask Jon stewart. he will

confirm. :-D

[AspenRose]

8. He got the memo

If he repeats it enough, bushbots will begin repeating it.

"But increasingly, the media has turned into a nasty partisan group of ideologues. And if you disagree with them, you're going to get personally attacked."

You should know, projection-man!

[maxsolomon]

9. no matter what he says, he's talking about himself

Now the danger is that 300 million Americans are living in a country where objectivity and fair play have pretty much disappeared in the media (BILL OREILLY). So how are we supposed to know the truth about events and people? The press is supposed to be our eyes and ears. But increasingly, the media (BILL OREILLY) has turned into a nasty partisan group of ideologues (BILL OREILLY). And if you disagree with them (BILL OREILLY), you're going to get personally attacked (BY BILL OREILLY). Reuters (BILL OREILLY) should be ashamed of itself.

[Pepper32]

10. Did he see any of the polls after this "comeback speech"?

Geez... talk about delusional. :rofl:

[bluedawg12]

11. More evidence that douche bags can talk. n/t

[bigbrother05]

12. The only 'comeback' that twit could manage

would be "Oh yeah?" And he'd probably mumble his way through that too.

[hwmnbn]

13. Hey Bill, stuff that loofah .........

down your lying pervert mouth. You've been exposed. No one cares what you think.

You are a CREEP! :P

[one_true_leroy]

14. the claim on spending for the poor...

i'm skeptical, to say the least. can someone refute?

[Inland]

23. Wouldn't surprise me. There are more "poor."

If you include things that aren't means tested but go to poor people, like SS disability and pensions, for example, there's a ton more money going to poor.

And there's more people in poverty as a percentage.

[MN ChimpH8R]

15. Sniffing paint again, O'Reilly? nt

[peekaloo]

16. Huh? Oh yeah, Bu$h come back to New Orleans for another photo-op.

I actually read this drivel and I agree with the poster above who stated O'Shrilly's talking about himself.

[lancdem]

17. Boy, O'Reilly is even more clueless than usual

Comeback my ass.

[The_Casual_Observer]

18. Let's just see what the actual polls look like in a week or two.

Then we can comment on the "comeback"

[Downtown Hound]

20. Good luck Bill

It's not going to work anymore. Your ratings are going downhill almost as fast as your master's approval numbers. The two of you can sit and fantasize all you want, the rest of us will live in reality.

[warrens]

21. Wow, I have never seen spin like THAT

Even the Bushies aren't saying that, just that he will come back once people understand the situation. Which is laughable. His ratings went DOWN after that "beautiful speech."

O'Reilly must be on the payroll bigtime. Or they got him off that sexual harassment rap, but still have the tapes.

[Rob H.]

22. More proof that Bill O'Reilly lives in Bizzarro World

Wow. You can smell the stink of desperation all the way across the vast expanse of the internets.

But increasingly, the media has turned into a nasty partisan group of ideologues.

Okay, technically that's true--he should know because he's one of 'em!

And if you disagree with them, you're going to get personally attacked.

Or be told by O'Reilly that if this were the Old West, he would just shoot you. Whichever.

[Edgewater_Joe]

24. BWAA HAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!

Is this a case of too much falafel or not enough falafel?

[RoBear]

25. How does he BREATHE with his head so far up his ass???

[Starbucks Anarchist]

26. Maybe * is spending more on poor people...

because there's more of them since he took office.

[onenote]

27. Okay Bill, here are the numbers:

1993 (Bill Clinton's first year as President): 39.3 million people below poverty (rate of 15.1 percent)

1996 (Bill Clinton's fourth year as President): 36.6 million people below poverty (rate of 13.7 percent)

2000 (Bill Clinton's last year as President): 31.6 million people below poverty (rate of 11.3 percent)

2001 (George W Bush's first year as President): 32.9 million people below poverty (rate of 11.7 percent)

2004 (George W Bush's fourth year as President): 37 million people below poverty (rate of 12.7 percent).

THUS, while its "true" that the poverty rate was lower in Bush's fourth year as President than it was in Clinton's, the facts are that the poverty rate dropped every year Clinton was President and has increased every year Bush has been President. And a 12.7 percent poverty rate in 2004 actually represents more people living in poverty than 13.7 percent rate in 2004. Or put it this way - In the first four years of his presidency, 2.7 million Americans escaped poverty. During the first four years of Bush's presidency, over 4 million Americans fell into poverty.

So, if anyone throws Bill's little lie at you, just toss back the truth.

onenote

[MaineDem]

28. He did come back from Camp David. I guess that counts.

Sheesh!