Lerkfish
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-05-05 08:30 AM
Original message |
Question; Why doesn't Homeland Security ORDER testing for tularemia? |
|
wouldn't that be their job if even a suspected attack happened? Shouldn't they order all protestors to be tested (not that that would make me more comfortable, necessarily), but isn't this a suspicious omission on their part?
Their FIRST response was to declare it NOT an act of terrorism. Think back to other things immediately declared NOT an act of terrorism...anthrax, for example.
HOW DO THEY KNOW? they have not investigated anything at all, have not tested potential victims, have not determined the source...how can they rule out terrorism? and the best point is:
if it WAS an act of terrorism, for them not to do so would be a breach of national security.
am I right or am I right?
|
Gman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-05-05 08:34 AM
Response to Original message |
1. You may as well ask why they haven't found the Anthrax sender |
|
It's all the same people.
|
atommom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-05-05 08:37 AM
Response to Original message |
2. You're right. Their silence on this should give us all the creeps. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 07:47 PM
Response to Original message |