win_in_06
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-19-05 01:31 PM
Original message |
If the Bush Bunch takes indictments, which repugs can run with |
|
clean hands in '08?
Not McCain Not Frist Not Condi Not Cheney
|
CottonBear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-19-05 01:32 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Not Powell, Rummy or Chertoff. n/t |
quiet.american
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-19-05 01:33 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Watch 'em try, though. n/t |
win_in_06
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-19-05 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. I want to watch candidates try to distance themselves from the shrub |
quiet.american
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-19-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
9. That will make for a spectacle. :) n/t |
asjr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-19-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message |
4. It would probably take a lifetime search for a |
|
clean Republican and at the end there would be no guarantee.
|
win_in_06
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-19-05 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
12. Can George Allen plead ignorance? |
shantipriya
(367 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-19-05 01:36 PM
Response to Original message |
|
We shouldn't get our hopes up. It is quite possible there might be NO indictments!!
|
lancdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-19-05 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
We just don't know exactly who or what.
|
win_in_06
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-19-05 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. I don't want to see some doorman get indicted |
shantipriya
(367 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-19-05 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
My thoughts also. I hope it doesn't end in some low-level operatives getting indicted.The Repugs are nasty and dangerous bunch. They will and can do anything to avoid indictments. And don't forget, they are in power in all branches of Gov't.And the opposition is spineless!!!
|
lancdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-19-05 01:36 PM
Response to Original message |
win_in_06
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-19-05 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. He has positioned himself well, he may be one of the few |
Dave Sund
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-19-05 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
15. I've said for a while now |
|
Hagel is one that genuinely scares me. He talks the talk but doesn't walk the walk. He appears more moderate than he really is. Say it's Hillary vs. Hagel... Which one of these has advocated withdrawal from Iraq, at least in public statements? You add in Hagel's ties to ES&S, and you've got an election that we'll almost surely lose.
|
longship
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-19-05 01:43 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Now that would make it an interesting race.
|
zann725
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-19-05 01:46 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Not one. That's why a Dem is destined for the job. |
win_in_06
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-19-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. I agree. So our candidate should beat the repug about the head and |
|
shoulders with the last 8 yrs
|
Gidney N Cloyd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-19-05 02:14 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Dan Quayle is tanned, rested and ready to serve! |
|
Seriously, if they want someone fairly skeleton-free, John Danforth (fmr sen of Missouri) is out there and he's no older than McCain.
|
woodsprite
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-19-05 03:00 PM
Response to Original message |
18. My bet? Newt Gingrich. n/t |
win_in_06
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-19-05 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
19. His name is creeping up in the polls |
|
after what this bunch has done, his sins look small.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 11th 2024, 11:03 AM
Response to Original message |