|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
merbex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:39 AM Original message |
Name the Democratic Senators who will lean over backwards for Alito |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmejack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
1. Liebermann |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sinkingfeeling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
2. Mark Pryor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
3. Ben Nelson, Max Baucus, and maybe Joe Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:43 AM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Joe Lieberman - see I knew it - shame shame shame!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
4. Nelson (NE), Pryor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:41 AM Response to Original message |
5. Definately Ben Nelson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tx_dem41 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
6. I would say that none are sure at the moment....we should be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:43 AM Original message |
Chafee - He has to justify his endorsement by NARAL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tx_dem41 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
13. D'oh...of course... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigscott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:43 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Lieberman for sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tx_dem41 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:44 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Why do you say Lieberman for sure? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
7. I think we have the filibuster - Reid has pretty much assured us that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merbex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:46 AM Response to Reply #7 |
16. By identifying those Senators we can focus our efforts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
8. Good question; I'm also curious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
11. I'm not sure Lieberman will go along |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
14. Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hippiegranny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 11:03 AM Response to Reply #14 |
58. But he has always been on record as being pro-choice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTD (732 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
15. Lieberman for sure. Probably Landrieu also. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tx_dem41 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:50 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Silly statement... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTD (732 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:53 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Fine. It *seems* like they vote more reliably with the Repugs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tx_dem41 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:56 AM Response to Reply #20 |
25. I appreciate the response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
long_green (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:51 AM Response to Reply #15 |
19. Mary Landrieu is not as bad as Joementum... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:54 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. On these issues, Lieberman is a lot better than her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:00 AM Response to Reply #19 |
27. Hey |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:02 AM Response to Reply #19 |
29. NARAL gives Landrieu ZERO, Lieberman - 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:04 AM Response to Reply #29 |
30. NARAL never USED to give Landrieu a zero |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:06 AM Response to Reply #30 |
34. Hey, I love Mary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:17 AM Response to Reply #34 |
41. Well...okay then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:18 AM Response to Reply #29 |
42. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:23 AM Response to Reply #42 |
46. See post 31 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:59 AM Response to Reply #15 |
26. You leave Senator Landrieu alone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tx_dem41 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:05 AM Response to Reply #26 |
32. I agree with you. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:16 AM Response to Reply #32 |
40. Good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tx_dem41 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:22 AM Response to Reply #40 |
45. I was born and raised in Louisiana.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:27 AM Response to Reply #45 |
48. Oh WELL, that's EVEN better! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnnInLa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 03:44 PM Response to Reply #48 |
63. Mary is plenty pissed at "bush and them" right now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Savannah Progressive (272 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
18. Well here are the Repugnik Lites who voted for Roberts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merbex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:54 AM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Without even really looking closely I can cross at least 11 off this list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:56 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. A lot can be crossed - not sure concerning Byrd. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:25 AM Response to Reply #18 |
47. Probably half of that group will vote for him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
23. Blanche Lincoln |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:01 AM Response to Reply #23 |
28. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:27 AM Response to Reply #28 |
49. She votes often with the administration. She voted for Roberts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
...of J.Temperance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 11:01 AM Response to Reply #49 |
57. Oh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
31. If pro-Choice is the most important factor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tx_dem41 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:06 AM Response to Reply #31 |
35. Out of that list, the only ones I would be worried about are.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:09 AM Response to Reply #35 |
37. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:30 AM Response to Reply #31 |
51. Got it. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
33. this is a good thread. lets attack the dems BEFORE we even |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merbex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:11 AM Response to Reply #33 |
39. I am not attacking - I merely want to know who I have to pressure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:20 AM Response to Reply #39 |
43. cool. how are the other posts doing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
36. Here are the Dems who supported him in 1990 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merbex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:10 AM Response to Reply #36 |
38. All any of them have to do is point to examples of why he hasn't lived up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:20 AM Response to Reply #38 |
44. Agreed, but they need to do it strongly, with conviction, and NOW |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTD (732 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 11:18 AM Response to Reply #36 |
59. There are some VERY liberal Dems on that list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
losdiablosgato (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
50. Add Kennedy, and Lautenburg to the list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:31 AM Response to Reply #50 |
52. READ KENNEDY"S STATEMENT FROM TODAY INSTEAD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:33 AM Response to Reply #50 |
53. previous confirmation, 15 years ago is irrelevant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
54. This Thread is POINTLESS until we get statements from them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ready4Change (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
55. "Lean over?" "Bend over" is a more accurate term. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tgnyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
56. Any guy from an all-white, corn-shucking, Midwest state with 1400 people, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tx_dem41 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 11:44 AM Response to Reply #56 |
60. Nope.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 02:43 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. I guess he has no Pryor knowledge.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tx_dem41 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-31-05 02:54 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. Now, that's funny. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 09th 2024, 06:50 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC