Nimrod2005
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 10:15 AM
Original message |
Poll question: Let's settle this RIGHT NOW!!! |
|
There is no "other" or "neither" choices, IF they are the last two, who would you choose?
|
AtomicKitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 10:16 AM
Response to Original message |
tk2kewl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
:spank:
I continue to hold out hope too.
|
Nimrod2005
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
Nimrod2005
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. I know, but did you vote? |
AtomicKitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
still holding out hope though
|
Nimrod2005
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
I am too, if not I will have to pick the General...
|
hwmnbn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Hey! I can't DU this poll..... |
wyldwolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message |
6. how does this settle anything - except among a few on DU? |
Nimrod2005
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
12. And the rest of the universe who keep saying they are THE TWO leaders bla blah |
|
blah, and the other part of the universe who want you to think that this is over, it is a given who is going to "GET" the nomination...etc. I am sick of all of this talk, I want to prove a point here (if I am right about the results of this poll).
|
wyldwolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
16. I'll just have to trust you then. I look forward to you revealing your point. |
Forkboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
17. I somehow suspect if the poll were going the other way you'd be praising it. |
|
For the record,I think the poll doesn't prove much either,and all the more reason why one should be dubious of all polls,agreeable or not,no?
|
wyldwolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
20. typically, you'd be wrong. I've never put stock in a DU poll as indicative of anything ... |
|
Edited on Fri Feb-23-07 10:39 AM by wyldwolf
...but the opinions of those on DU who happen to be online when it is posted.
|
SharonRB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Another Al Gore here, too |
|
But if it had to be Obama or Hillary, it would have to be Obama.
|
Buzz Clik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message |
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 10:20 AM
Response to Original message |
10. Not enough Democrats to suit me. Two good ones, two strong ones, |
|
two capable ones, two electable ones, but not the whole field.
|
Nimrod2005
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #43 |
47. Wrong key to the door I've left open. |
|
I like all our blue team and will support my first choice among them in my state's primary.
|
meegbear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message |
11. Britney ... I mean Anna Nicole ... I mean ... |
Nimrod2005
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
I know it is not cool to say this: but I wish Spears had dies instead of ANS. I am sick of Britney, at least ANS could have used her millions to start a foundation for women with boob sizes larger than their IQ.
|
longship
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message |
14. Where's the freaking fire???????? |
|
We don't *NEED* to settle this right now. It's over a freaking year before many one of us have to make a decision on this matter.
Furthermore, right now the only thing I've decided about the 2008 election is that I want neither Obama nor Clinton to get the nomination. That is likely to change with at least Obama, but maybe both of them. I will not be evaluating that possibility until well after the end of the year.
Nobody can make a compelling argument that there is any urgency to selecting a candidate this far out from the primaries, let alone the nominating convention.
Where's the fucking fire?
Stop this insanity!!!
|
frogcycle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
underpants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message |
18. Edwards Richardson etc |
Forkboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message |
19. Doesn't mean anything because right now we don't have to settle for two |
|
Where's Jim Sagle when we need him?
|
ms liberty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 10:46 AM
Response to Original message |
21. Al Gore....sorry, but that's my choice, and I'm stickin' to it! n/t |
Seabiscuit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 10:48 AM
Response to Original message |
22. These results are encouraging. n/t |
Nimrod2005
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
Hosnon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message |
|
And to all of the Gore "voters": why change the hypothetical? He's not an option here.
|
Larry in KC
(465 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
32. One big reason to change the hypothetical: |
|
Because if enough people pretend, and get others to believe, that those are our only two choices, then they will BECOME our only two choices.
I vote resoundingly for Wes Clark!
|
Hosnon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
33. I don't think every poll has to include every major candidate. |
|
This poll limits it to two candidates. If someone wants to start a poll with more, go ahead. But the OP wants to know who we would vote for between these two.
It defeats the purpose of a poll if we can simply change it to include choices we want.
|
Larry in KC
(465 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
42. Even our presidential elections allow write-in candidates... |
|
...it's true that they rarely win, but often the reason a write-in wins is that those officially on the ballot are such poor choices. I'm just sayin'...
|
quinnox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 11:19 AM
Response to Original message |
25. Hillary without a second thought |
DKRC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
26. We just canceled each other out |
invictus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 12:15 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Fri Feb-23-07 12:21 PM by invictus
"Everybody in politics lies, but (the Clintons) do it with such ease, it's troubling." -David Geffen
|
Nimrod2005
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
28. ROFL...You had to bring this in, didn't you? |
mnhtnbb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 12:19 PM
Response to Original message |
29. Except there won't be only two choices in the first primaries |
invictus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 12:20 PM
Response to Original message |
30. Obama has a better chance of winning the presidency |
|
America is tired of dynastic politics.
G.H.W. BUSH -> W.J. CLINTON -> G.W. BUSH -> H.R. CLINTON -> JEB BUSH ->
NO THANK YOU!
|
Bucky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
46. You forgot Chelsea, who will end Jeb's disastrous occupation of Poland |
|
You didn't think we were going to forget Poland again, did you?
|
mnhtnbb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 12:20 PM
Response to Original message |
31. Be sure and send Hillary's campaign these poll reults! |
Nimrod2005
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
35. It is on my mind of course - With Cc to Tweety and Co. |
PresidentObama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 01:09 PM
Response to Original message |
ShortnFiery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 02:12 PM
Response to Original message |
36. Obama for President in 2008! n/t |
MrSlayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 04:04 PM
Response to Original message |
flaminbats
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 04:19 PM
Response to Original message |
38. I only picked Hillary because Obama wasn't in the last debate.. |
|
I'm more familiar with Hillary and her positions on the issues, but less familiar with Senator Obama.
something tells me this will change, and if this poll was held after a debate in which Obama participated..he would get my vote.
|
rep the dems
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 04:26 PM
Response to Original message |
39. Looks like a lot of people still aren't answering the question. |
Nimrod2005
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
40. I know I was hoping to get 200 votes by now, a nice sample...nt |
Guaranteed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 04:29 PM
Response to Original message |
41. Between the two, I think you have to give Obama a chance. But I'm definitely |
paulk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-23-07 05:06 PM
Response to Original message |
|
is that based on DU's history of supporting the losing candidate
Hillary's looking like the nominee...
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 14th 2024, 09:48 AM
Response to Original message |