SHRED
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-08-07 11:03 PM
Original message |
msongs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-08-07 11:05 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I think neither of them are candidates. nt |
SHRED
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-08-07 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
...but I can dream can't I?
;)
|
Warren DeMontague
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-08-07 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. No. You are REQUIRED BY LAW to choose one of the pre-approved candidates. NOW. |
|
Edited on Tue May-08-07 11:15 PM by impeachdubya
Thus sayeth the supporters of the pre-approved candidates.
|
amitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-08-07 11:06 PM
Response to Original message |
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-08-07 11:07 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I'm in the minority because it's way too early for me to decide anything. |
|
But your choices are interesting! considering neither have expressed much of a desire. Should they, I'd definitely consider it.
|
Manifestor_of_Light
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-08-07 11:07 PM
Response to Original message |
5. From your lips to their ears....... |
Auntie Bush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-08-07 11:10 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Couldn't beat that combination! A 45-50 state rout. n/t |
Warren DeMontague
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-08-07 11:14 PM
Response to Original message |
8. I like Gore/Feingold, but I think Gore/Clark would be solid, too. |
pscot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-08-07 11:20 PM
Response to Original message |
TwilightGardener
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-08-07 11:21 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Would be a solid ticket, but it ain't gonna happen. |
calteacherguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-08-07 11:34 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Forget. No chance Gore will run and Clark probably won't. nt |
Nictuku
(907 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-08-07 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. I tihnk you are wrong (nt) |
Tom Rinaldo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-09-07 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
17. Seems to me there will be new Presidential candidates... |
|
...certainly on the Republican side with Fred Thompson, Newt Gingritch, Chck Hagel and others still being talked about. On the Dem side we have Gore and Clark, and I even remember hearing that Mark Warner at one point was musing over coming back in. This Presidential season started too early. All the warts of the current candidates are on display for an overly extended period, and I think that sets up a dynamic where new blood would be welcomed into the race, on either and or both sides.
|
Crunchy Frog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-08-07 11:37 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I Just don't see it in the cards though. :(
|
lildreamer316
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-09-07 01:20 AM
Response to Original message |
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-09-07 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
lildreamer316
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-09-07 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
Tom Rinaldo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-09-07 01:25 AM
Response to Original message |
16. I still fervently hope that one or both of these men |
|
will still enter the race for President. I would be thrilled to elect either one of them to that office. I would obviously therefor be thrilled if the ticket you propose came to be, though I would pick Clark for our next Prez given my druthers. But like I said, even Gore without Clark would be a godsend for our nation, or vice versa in my opinion.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 14th 2024, 10:28 PM
Response to Original message |