Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Washington Post: Happy days are here again for Democrats

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 07:30 PM
Original message
Washington Post: Happy days are here again for Democrats

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/editorial/outlook/5410248.html

Party's poised to achieve majority GOP strategist Karl Rove dreamed of

By JOHN B. JUDIS and RUY TEIXEIRA
Washington Post

Karl Rove's grandest aspiration was to create a Republican majority that would dominate American politics for a generation or more. But as the effects of his distinctive brand of fear-mongering fade, it's the Democrats who are poised to become the country's majority party — and perhaps for a long time to come.

Many conservatives have insisted that the Democrats' wins in the 2006 midterm elections, as well as their recent pickups in some 2007 races, were mere blips. They wish. Political, ideological, demographic and economic trends are all leading toward durable Democratic majorities in Congress, control of most statehouses and, very possibly, the end of the decades-old GOP hammerlock on the Electoral College.

This sea change is the result of the electorate's disenchantment with conservative Republicans, beginning in the 1990s. The old conservative majority, as given voice by Ronald Reagan and Newt Gingrich, sought to cut federal regulation, to privatize government operations and to slash social spending. But by late in Bill Clinton's presidency, broad public majorities had come to back environmental and consumer regulation, as well as significant new government spending on health care and education. As President Bush discovered in 2005, the public also disliked attempts to gut Social Security.

Moreover, much of the electorate had grown leery of the GOP's fervent identification with the religious right. As early as 1992, mainstream voters were turned off by Pat Buchanan's nasty, divisive "culture war" speech at the Republican National Convention. Attempts by religious conservatives to stop teaching evolution and funding human stem-cell research spurred a widespread backlash, even in states such as Kansas, which Democrats had given up for dead.

This dramatic shift in the public's outlook carried with it a change in the makeup of the Republican and Democratic coalitions in a way that decisively helps Democrats. Even in conservatism's heyday, Democrats received the support of African-Americans, Hispanics and a group of white working-class voters (especially union members) who had not switched parties in the 1980s and become "Reagan Democrats." That was fine for a base, but not enough to win the White House or to keep Congress. But over the past two decades, two new groups have migrated to the Democratic Party — and provided the basis for an enduring majority coalition.

First, there are women, who used to vote disproportionately Republican. (In 1960, for instance, women backed the Republican Richard M. Nixon, with his 5 o'clock shadow, over the dashing Democrat John F. Kennedy.) But in the 1990s, troubled by the Republicans' ardor for the religious right and opposition to social spending, they began voting disproportionately Democratic — especially single women, working women and college-educated women. In the 2000 congressional elections, single women backed Democrats over Republicans by a whopping 63 percent to 35. Even better news for Democrats: Women are more likely to vote than men.

FULL story at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. I will dance a jig in the streets
if we win the WH and hold onto both houses of congress in November
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midlife_mo_Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. SO WILL I!
I just don't see our the repubs are going to let this happen. :( Scary thoughts I have...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Wait a minute Mo-Jo
you don't mean to suggest that the republic party would ever resort to dirty tricks to try and STEAL an election do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midlife_mo_Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Well...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. I have only one disagreement with the otherwise-excellent article...
So if the electorate is swinging Democratic, why does the GOP still hold the White House? The reason is 9/11 (...) and the voters who were most worried about new terrorist attacks backed Bush's Republicans in the first two post-9/11 elections, 2002 and 2004.

(...)

But after Bush's victory in 2004, the spell cast by 9/11 began to lift...


The reason is election fraud. Period. Just look at how the boy king's approval ratings continue to dip steadily right after he was supposedly "re-elected". If he were legitimately voted back into the WH, where is the overwhelming support?:


http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-presapp0605-31.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Yes, election fraud...if we
had fair elections those goperverts would never have gotten in and there wouldn't have been a 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. KR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh Happy Day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. So karl rove wasn't quite the
fucking "genius" some gave him credit for? Evil never makes it for the long run..now we have to get rid of our evil m$$$$$m cause hitler's press got indicted at nuremberg so there's precident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC