itsrobert
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-03-08 10:51 PM
Original message |
Obama is going to get a big lift from this victory |
|
and Hillary losing will deflate her campaign. It's now a 2 person race: Obama vs. Edwards.
|
TwilightZone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-03-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Hillary has a lead nationally and in several of the upcoming states.
Plus, she has loads of cash.
She's not going anywhere.
|
itsrobert
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-03-08 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. She also had a lead in Iowa and loads of cash |
|
She ended up losing Iowa. She should drop out.
|
Sparkly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-03-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. She didn't start with a lead, and they'd thought of skipping Iowa. |
|
She's well-positioned to go on.
Not sure about Edwards, financially.
|
TwilightZone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-03-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. Ah, the "she had a lead" meme. |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-03-08 11:01 PM by TwilightZone
Edwards was ahead in Iowa for months and was leading until August.
He also spent a lot of money in Iowa.
I guess that he should drop out, too.
Sorry, but your assertion is ridiculous. Iowa isn't the only state running a primary or caucus.
|
David Dunham
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-03-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message |
2. No. Edwards lacks the money and organization to compete nationally |
Sulawesi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-03-08 10:55 PM
Response to Original message |
4. If HRC takes NH, she is back on top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 11th 2024, 07:05 PM
Response to Original message |