Herman Munster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-04-08 12:48 AM
Original message |
Second choicers broke heavily for Edwards, Obama just had too much turnout |
saracat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-04-08 12:49 AM
Response to Original message |
DadOf2LittleAngels
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-04-08 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
They are basically claiming Hill really finished 2nd what they are ignoring (and wiat I love about the caucus) is that people who dont like her hate her! I could vote for Obama or Edwards but not Hill..
|
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-04-08 12:49 AM
Response to Original message |
|
When they are voting for a Democrat, we can't have too much.
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-04-08 12:51 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Too much was perfect, finally. nt |
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-04-08 12:52 AM
Response to Original message |
4. You mean, he actually won it based on his appeal! |
frazzled
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-04-08 12:52 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Nowhere else does second-choice matter--turnout is everything |
|
Now, I don't know if this Obama machine can get similar turnout results in other states, but if it does, jeebus.
|
Capn Sunshine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-04-08 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
13. well, that's been the plan all along. |
|
Most of us DO know how to win in this organization......
|
Occam Bandage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-04-08 12:53 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Too much? Hardly. Great to see Obama bringing in more voters! |
City Lights
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-04-08 12:56 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Are you trying to say too much turnout is a bad thing? eom |
LordJFT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-04-08 12:59 AM
Response to Original message |
9. damn him, causing high voter turnout is a cheap political trick! |
Herman Munster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-04-08 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. I'm just saying the facts |
|
Edwards own people said he needed turnout of 135,000 to 140,000 to win.
|
mhatrw
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-04-08 01:02 AM
Response to Original message |
11. Young, first time caucusers were STRONGLY for Obama. n/t |
madrchsod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-04-08 01:29 AM
Response to Original message |
12. obama and edwards won everyone but those over 65...... |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 11th 2024, 12:54 PM
Response to Original message |