Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Since when did using RW terms against Democrats become allowed on DU?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:47 PM
Original message
Since when did using RW terms against Democrats become allowed on DU?
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 02:49 PM by LostinVA
I've been told I'm a bully and into censorship because I don't like DEMOCRATS being referred to by RW slurs coined by the RW Machine to slime Dems: Slick Willy, Billary, Hitlery, etc. Oh, and I was also told that those of us on the Left ALWAYS call the Clintons these names.

This is against DU rules, just as is linking to RW sources is. I don;t give a damn if you don't like HRC, but explain why, don't use RW filth to do it. WE've fought too long and hard against this.


on edit: This isn't a call out to Mods or Admins -- they're doing a fine job amongst this madness!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. To be honest, it started becoming acceptable here when Hillary announced her candidacy... and...
... the so-called "progressives" doing it have no other ammo to use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. that is just about the silliest thing I've read here today....
Sheesh. Got link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. so you think using RW labels have been the norm on DU? Talk about silly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. no, I think your smear against progressives is ridiculous....
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 03:01 PM by mike_c
...and utterly unsupported.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. ahh... is you wittle feelings hurt because I've called "progressives" on their bullshit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. you haven't done squat-- you've made an unsubstantiated claim....
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 07:04 PM by mike_c
That's about par, I suppose. My FEELINGS? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. I do not know when it started but also wish people would retrain from using them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Welcome to the silly season.
It will only get worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. My favorite;
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yeah, but
"This was probably a death blow to Kucinich,"

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riqster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I'm a Kooch backer, and am laughing at that one! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riqster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. And we election integrity activists are being told (by DUers)
..."Get over it", "Sore Loser", "Sour Grapes"...all the things the Reeps said in 2000.


We need a new acronym, I guess: IOKIYAD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. We've also been told if we don't like Obama
leave the country because the Obama train is going to roll right over the country.

Its amazing how many ppl are willing to act like a Bushie when they (think) they have the upper hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. That's the type of thing normal people say
When they hear batshit crazy stories about Hillary "rigging" a Democratic primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riqster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. A classic example of what the OP was calling out:
<1> "Normal", meaning yourself. Anyone who disagrees is "abnormal".

<2> "...batshit crazy stories about Hillary "rigging" a Democratic primary" Short on facts, long on insult.
In actuality, very few (I have seen none) stories say that Hillary rigged the election. Some do suggest that the Reeps rigged it for reasons of their own. A classic example of transference as practiced by Reeps.

Most of the stories I have seen have said "This looks like 2004. Let's look into it, so as to prevent another stolen Presidential election later this year". Not crazy at all, so those get ignored.

Thanks for proving the OP's point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. I did tell sore losers to get over it -- they need to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riqster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. When you can prove the election wasn't rigged, I'll listen to you.
Computers don't give a damn about insults. They just run programs. And it is computers that are the issue here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. It was a very pointed attack against HRC winning, it had nothing to do with
Election integrity -- it's just being used to bash someone they don't want to win.

I am not talking about you or any of the sincere posters... but, there is a cadre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riqster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Understood, and I appreciate it.
The problem is, there is a cadre on the HRC side too, and I have been flamed by them today.

Election Integrity is the only cure for the nation's ills, since it's election fraud (aided and abetted by the Supremes and others) that caused the problem. It'd be nice if more Dems supported it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. So, what you're saying is...that there's a double standard being applied to Hillary?
I can't imagine that happening. Not on DU. Or in the media.

No, never!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Well, to be fair, Edwrads and Biden have also been called neo-cons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. True.
Though the big guns, more often than not, usually seem to be reserved for Senator Clinton. Or her husband.

On the other hand, the snarky nicknames people use do have a useful purpose. They tend to quickly ID the posters that can safely be taken less than seriously.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
23. I agree. Stay in the adult. Don't feed the infiltrators who smell blood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC