Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Hillary's Comment About MLK & LBJ Had Racial Overtones. It Was Intentional.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 05:10 PM
Original message
Why Hillary's Comment About MLK & LBJ Had Racial Overtones. It Was Intentional.
Edited on Sun Jan-13-08 05:38 PM by David Zephyr
In regards to Hillary Clinton's comments about MLK & LBJ in context to Barack Obama being an inspiring leader and speaker:

Hillary claims that she was only making a "point" distinguishing between just making speeches as opposed to really getting progress into law.

Now this is a subject that could be debated either way. Howard Zinn suggests that all progress has come from "direct action" rather than "electoral action." But that debate is open. I do side with Howard Zinn. I respect those who disagree.

Still, there are a million other examples Hillary COULD have used to make her oddly disconnected "point" when talking about Barack Obama who she suggested was merely an inspirational speaker.

She might have mentioned Susan B. Anthony who labored long and never saw women receive the right to vote when W. Wilson signed that right into law.

Hillary might have mentioned the Haymarket Martyrs or the Wobblies and Union Organizers who gave their lives never seeing FDR sign into law labor organizing rights.

But INSTEAD she made her odd "point" about a BLACK man who did not achieve civil rights for people of color until a WHITE president signed them into law.

The metaphor she chose to make her "point" clearly had two ringing similarities: one to make her "point" against "direct action" and the second to draw comparison between two BLACK men.

She could have used a million other examples. She chose the one that also had the ingredient of race.

And in doing this, she continues what her campaign began in Iowa: remind voters that Barack is black.

That is what was shitty about her comments.

Hillary wasn't making a "point".

She was making two points at the same time. And one of them was to remind voters that Barack is black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Black and Beautiful,
hillary.. get over it, cause this country is tired of slime politics like the clintons are dishing out at a rabid rate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. Hillary is obviously a divider
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. She might have used those other examples if the Obama camp was using them.
She did not originate the JFK/MLK meme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. K
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. I generally respect you David, but you are way off base here
MLK was Barack's example, not something Hillary pulled from the air.

1) IN debate, Hillary says rhetoric isn't everything.
2) Next day, Barack says Hillary's framing would have undone MLK's dream (comparing himself directly to Dr. King, as if any criticism of him is a criticism of MLK)
3) In response, Hillary cites Johnson's contributions, which is appropriate because she and Barack are both supposed to be running for President, a specific role MLK never played nor even desired.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Well, she sure put him in his place, didn't she??
"He started it, mommy!" (That uppity negrah! How DARE he talk about Dr. King??)

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. right on as usual.
good summary of events.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. god said Sunday should be a day of Rest--so rest with this crapola
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemCam Donating Member (911 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Agreed and am gonna shut it down and get out my novel. Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well said, David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. She talked about MLK because Obama had talked about MLK.
If Obama had made a point about Susan B. Anthony, and she wanted to rebut that, she'd have talked about Susan B. Anthony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Well he has talked about lots of fights
He's talked about a variety of civil rights fights, I think he's tossed in different names here and there. So she did pick MLK. I don't think she did it as a code, I think she blatantly disrespected the man. But she could have made her point more graciously. More important, if it was truly an innocent remark, she'd just apologize and move on. She did with that gas station owner comment, remember?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anouka Donating Member (712 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Would she have said Wilson was more important than Anthony?
Edited on Sun Jan-13-08 06:10 PM by Anouka
particularly since Anthony died 14 years before President Wilson and an all white-male congress passed the 19th Amendment?

Maybe she would have. But Anthony's work as a suffragist (and abolitionist) paved the way for equal rights regardless of race or gender; grass roots sacrifice and hard work and making sure the issues were in the public eye allowed the top to sign off on what should have already been a done deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. the sad thing for me is that i used to think she was smarter and more prinicipled than this
...at least, that is what i wanted to think....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. You thilly thavage, you!
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. i have no idea what your comment means, but have a good day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. idle curiousity
but if you said this to or about a gay poster would I be allowed to read it as anti gay using the same theory you are applying to Hillary in regards to race? I have no idea of the the poster you responded to is lesbian or not, but let's assume she is for a second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Well ... I have no authority to "allow" or "disallow" anything.
There isn't the slightest INTENTION to be "anti-gay" ... but, hell, don't let that get in the way. That's not the "DU way."

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. but you just know that when Hillary
says that LBJ was necessary for the passage of Civil Rights she is being racist? Why doesn't her intent matter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Well, I'll ask you after I announce my candidacy for President.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Oh so that is the difference?
Only those who run for President are to be judged under your standard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think it's the list of slurs
Any one of them can be an oversight or mistake, it's that they were one right after another that gave the impression of racism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZinZen Donating Member (599 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. Absolutely
I don't think these racial code patterns are going to bode positive for Hillary. Who the hell is advising her that this shit works?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. I get it now!
MLK was clearly spinning his wheels not getting anything done.
The white guy stepped in, took over, and got the job done.

Whats the problem? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
17. Thank you for continuing to feed World flameWar II.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Hillary Clinton "fed it" this morning on national television. And you blame me?
You have very selective outrage. LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. She is helping her campaign by doing so. If you intend to help the Clinton campaign
by burning what remains of civil debate in the Democratic party, go for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
20. You should be ashamed of yourself David
not really, but I felt I owed you that. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
21. You didn't prove your point to me David
Edited on Sun Jan-13-08 06:46 PM by Tom Rinaldo
Your alternate examples, with the possible exception of Susan B. Anthony, fall far short in terms of mass recognition, and the only actual individual you gave as an example was Anthony. I think there actually are very few individuals in American history who are so personally identified with a sweeping and inspirational social change movement as Martin Luther King Jr. The women's suffragett memvement has a number of leading lights, but more to the point the final victory happened long before the vast majority of Americans were even born. JFK, who of course was in office before LBJ, is a frequently cited relevent political figure in this election campaign. Many have compared him in ways with Obama. Woodwow Wilson has faded n the public imagination. Both he and Anthony are from a long distant era.

The Labor movement had dozens upon dozens of "heroes", but none since the Great Depression with the exception of Jimmy Hoffa captured the public imagination and he anin't exctly Saint Jimmy. MArtin Luther King Jr. and LBJ were contemporaries, King was assasinated after the Civil Rights Act passed. Susan B.Anthony as you pointed laid the groundwork but did not see the fruit. John Brown perhaps was an inspirational Abolishionist while Lincoln "freed the slaves", but Brown was a bit controversial. There isn't exactly a national holiday for him, not to mention that the civil war was 150 years ago. Actually the next best pairing of an inspirational leader rallying the nation and a skilled chief exectutive nailing down the social advance was Thomas Paine and Gworge Washington. That pari has the same sense of history, but that history is almost 250 years old.

Clinton may not have made a wise choice of examples but I honestly do not see any other pairing of people who accomplished so much to change the course of our nation in living memory of American voters as King and LBJ. They are the obvious example from history of the dynamic Hillary wanted to discuss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaLittle Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
23. YEP! Just The Beginning... Racism IS Synonomous W/ Coming Electability Reference
HillBill Wanted to wait til Edwards was out but is being cramped by John Edwards "Recalcitrant" stance...

Johnny boy ain't quitt'n NO Time Soon!

That's a Problemo Numero Uno Fer The Dang Corporatist Powers That Be/ Status Quo Nominee/Election Fix'in Machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddy Waters Guitar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
24. Great points, the NYT editorial
also emphasized as you did here: "She could have used a million other examples. She chose the one that also had the ingredient of race."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Is there a link to it?
I'm sure they said it better than I did. I'm glad I'm not alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZinZen Donating Member (599 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
26. Spot on post, David Z
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC