iris5426
(697 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-15-08 11:35 PM
Original message |
Thinking Joe Trippi wasn't the best choice to represent Edwards in the current discussion |
|
where's the guy that was on Tucker earlier?
|
K Gardner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-15-08 11:36 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I think Trippi & Axelrod were both still in shock from Tweety's immediate revision of the debate. It |
|
was enough to leave any rational person breathless.
|
iris5426
(697 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-15-08 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. good point...he was just not succint in any way and let them all talk over him |
Andy823
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-16-08 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
12. I solved the "tweety" problem |
|
I watched the debate, and then turned the channel! I can't stand to watch the media after the debates anymore trying to tell the viewers what happened, and who won, when we all watched it and don't really need them to tell us anything!
|
kelligesq
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-15-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
7. do think Trippi shocked at tweety - tweety very strange tonite |
KaryninMiami
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-15-08 11:38 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Well perhaps if he'd been given a chance to speak it might have helped |
|
But the conversation as per usual these days, was mostly about the "dueling duo"- Edwards was barely mentioned at all, unfortunately. Joe never had a chance to say anything except when he pushed his way in. Very unfair.
|
dajoki
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-16-08 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Hate to say, but I'm used to it and also very sick of it. I just wonder where Edwards would be now had he not been totally ignored by the media since he started his campaign.
|
KaryninMiami
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-16-08 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. Hard to say really- if it was just Edwards and Clinton it would be Edwards- |
|
but when we put Obama into the mix and the electricity he brings to the table as he ignites his way around the country- I'm not sure even with more coverage, whether Edwards could outshine him- regardless of whether he is more qualified or not. Obama is generating excitement from the same independents the Edwards would be attracting- but Obama really has captivated new audiences that were not paying attention before and might not be paying attention otherwise.
|
dajoki
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-16-08 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. Well, its too late now... |
|
but I would have loved to know.
|
William769
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-15-08 11:40 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I don't think any of the three that spoke this evening for the candidates were any good. |
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-15-08 11:42 PM
Response to Original message |
5. It still baffles me that any candidate hires rippi to head their campaign! |
|
I blame HIM for what happened to Dean, and remember he also headed Mondale's campaign! The guy is a looser and if Edwards wins, it's certainly going to be in spite of Trippi!
|
kelligesq
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-15-08 11:45 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Tweety tryg shut up Trippi saying Hillary biggest lobbyst contribs big 3 who caused subprime mess = |
|
but Tweety acting speaking so stupid I'm wondering if he's drunk or needs an insulin shot or food
|
kelligesq
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-15-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. yep, he's drunk or high |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 11th 2024, 05:55 AM
Response to Original message |