Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary almost lost to "Please God no!" yesterday

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:42 AM
Original message
Hillary almost lost to "Please God no!" yesterday
These numbers are shocking. Hillary almost lost to "Other" in yesterday's Michigan race. Hillary has 99% name recognition and was married to a president, yet people came out in the snow and brutal cold to vote against her. I have never see such opposition to such a mainstream candidate. This is a bad sign for the general election (if she makes it).

Clinton 328,151 55%
Uncommitted 236,723 40%
Kucinich 21,708 4%
Dodd 3,853 1%
Gravel 2,363 0%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. I suppose that's one way to interpret it.
She has an 80%+ favorability rating among Democrats. Somehow I don't see what you suggest. Those were protest votes along with those who knew that vote might go to their candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
veniceboy Donating Member (44 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yawn.
A lot of them may not have realized Obama/Edwards were not even on the ballot. Not every democrat follows politics as closely as the folks on this board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. No, she beat
the combination of Edwards and Obama by 15% or 90,000 people.

Both the other major candidates asked supporters to vote uncommitted.

By your spin did more than 10 times as many people come out to vote against Dennis as those who voted for him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. How many more "uncommitted" voters didn't bother
to show up because of the farce that was the Michigan Democratic Primary? It's telling that a quarter of a million people would show up at a poll to register that they were "uncommitted."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Obama and Edwards never said anything about Michigan
But Granholm was encouraging people to vote for Hillary. Also, there was no campaign and no ads for anyone else. Hillaru should have won 75-25 considering her stature in the party and the nation. Don't take my word for it, look around GDP, there's other saying the same sort of thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. Granholm is very unpopular right now.
Many blame her for the problems with the economy instead of Bush. As if she caused the auto and manufacturing companies to leave Michigan. At any rate, an endorsement by Granholm at this point in time is not helpful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. they weren't on the ballot. Who knows how many
dems simply didn't bother. Turnout was low for dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. Or, Please God,no (i.e Edwards & Obama) didn't break 40% combined
Edited on Wed Jan-16-08 09:50 AM by robbedvoter
Mind you, Hillary didn't campaign there either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. Her name was on the ballot. Their names weren't.
There's really no way of knowing how many supporters of either of them simply didn't bother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. That is a down right distortion of what happened. It was a PROTEST
Vote. The media was bombarded with ads telling people to PROTEST the democratic party by voting uncommitted. And they did. And despite the fact that someone spent millions on ads suggesting the PROTEST VOTE, they still came out in the hundreds of thousands and voted for Clinton.

I wonder who was behind the money in the state they were not supposed to campaign in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. gee Obama got NO votes. oh well nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. Wow, a 15% win is now "almost lost".
"Snow and brutal cold" - never been to Michigan, have you? That's called "winter".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Yes, and people don't go out unless they have to,
Yet they went out of their way to vote against her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. More went out of their way to vote for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. by their theory then Obama's 8% win in Iowa was an almost won then.


Gee thanks for pointing that out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. it's called fuzzy math.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
10. This is a very dishonest and misleading OP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. And Granholm and Stabenow were begging people to vote for her.
There was a campaign on Hillary's behalf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Between The Cherry Picked Polls And Disingenuous Spinning I Don't Know Whether To Respond Or Ignore
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justyce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
16. Dems voting for other Dems in a primary, as opposed to
everyone choosing between the Repub or Dem in the general election are two completely different things. We can't assume the Dems that don't want her as the nominee would vote against her in the general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
19. The problem with your analysis
is that you assume the few people who turned out for this race are representative of those who will turn out in the General.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
20. How is 55% to 40% an "almost lost" in your book????
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
21. Also, "please, God, No" played dirty tricks and campaigned against Hillary - who didn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC