Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

HuffPost: Hillary's Politics of Fear

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 06:36 PM
Original message
HuffPost: Hillary's Politics of Fear
Hillary's Politics of Fear

Be afraid. Be very afraid.

This has been the mantra of the Bush Administration since 9/11 and it has now apparently been co-opted by Hillary Clinton.

Senator Clinton promises she will protect us from "day one." Barack Obama and John Edwards not only can't keep America safe since they don't have the experience of being First Lady for a combined 16 years, but terrorists will be more likely to come after us if either of them were elected president. Why? We don't know. It seemingly has nothing to do with policies, facts, or reality, but what George Orwell described as the powerful tool of fear.

Forget Big Brother; we apparently have Big Sister to keep us safe and secure.

Will Democrats really fall for the same fear-mongering, Cheney-Rove rhetoric they have despised and criticized over the past seven years?

"I don't think it was by accident that Al Qaeda decided to test the new prime minister," she was quoted as saying before the New Hampshire primary. "They watch our elections as closely as we do, maybe more closely than some of our fellows citizens do.... Let's not forget you're hiring a president not just to do what a candidate says during the election, you want a president to be there when the chips are down."

Senator Clinton's fear strategy was repeated and re-asserted in the Las Vegas, Nevada MSNBC Debate on Tuesday night. When asked if her previous statement that Al-Qaeda would be more likely to test a new president (apparently she doesn't qualify as "new") was meant to induce fear, she re-asserted:

"What I said is what you quoted, and I'm not going to characterize it, but it is the fact, you know, the fact is that we face a very dangerous adversary and to forget that, to brush it aside, I think is a mistake. So I do feel that the next president has to be prepared because we are up against a relentless enemy and they will take advantage of us. They will certainly, as they have over the last several years, continue their attacks against our friends and allies around the world. . .And at the end of the day voters have to make that decision among all of us. . . because it is a critical question."

Again, no explanation of why she is bringing this up on the campaign trail other than to a) perpetuate fear, and b) assert that she is the candidate uniquely able to protect American citizens.

Continue Reading: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joe-vogel/hillarys-politics-of-fea_b_81865.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Haven't we had enough of this to last a lifetime? Why is she swiping
neocon talking points anyway? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Madam Mossfern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Seems like that to me
I got really pizzed when she said that last night. Did Bush's advisors write that for her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Maybe Poppy...
or the Carlyle Group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. That ALONE should disqualify her from serious consideration.
It is Bush-esque in its insidiously craven nature and intent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. "big sister" and big
dog..hope those fearmongering clintons don't make to the general. If they're not trying to keep us trembling then they're smearin' and jeerin' Obama cause they're afraid of him.

They got nothin' otherwise why would they resort to rove's playbook?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. When posting diaries from Huffpost or Kos can we identify them as such?
Because to be honest, who cares Obama fellator Joe Vogel has to say?

:shrug:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. The truce is working well
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC