Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton's bill with Obama as co-sponsor?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 06:23 PM
Original message
Clinton's bill with Obama as co-sponsor?
On Tuesday's debate Hillary Clinton asked Barack Obama if he would co-sponsor some legislation that she was authoring. What was that about? I didn't see anything in any of the next day's post debate summaries. I thought that it was a weird stunt to try and pull off on national television.

What does DU think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. It would be a thing of beauty. Something good to come out of this mess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't even remember what it was supposed to be about. I just remember thinking, when she said it,
that that was a pretty heavy-handed way to pat herself on the back, asking him to tag along
and co-sponsor something he had no time to think about, which would have her name on it
as the author.

It was a "Have you stopped beating your wife" kind of moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's totally how I felt
If they really wanted she really wanted to blow me away with her bipartisanship they should have crafted something behind the scenes and announced it at the next debate. To me it came off as an obvious stunt to make us forget about the MLK comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Welcome to DU!!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Over 400 still gets a DU welcome?
I've been here a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Anything less than 500, in my book, is still a newbie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I think I was at 275 before the New Hampshire primaries
at this rate I reckon that I'll be at the 1000+ level by Super Tuesday. Needless to say, I haven't gotten a lot of work done at the office these last few weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Samantha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. I thought it was pure stagecraft as well
Edited on Thu Jan-17-08 08:33 PM by Samantha
I thought Obama recognized it for what it was. He responded in a masterful way. She expected him to feel cornered since the question was asked in the public eye. How could he possibly decline? Obama did not agree, instead choosing his words carefully. This is something we can work together on, he said. "Working together on" is in no way an agreement to co-sponsor.

This maneuver was a simple gimmick to show Hillary's mastery over the situation, resulting in Obama's obsequiousness. Foiled it he did.

Tricks are for kids.

Sam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Exactly my impression, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Does it seem like the MSM hasn't talked about this?
I haven't been able to find any analysis on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC