Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary says it was good we got rid of Saddam, right?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:40 AM
Original message
Hillary says it was good we got rid of Saddam, right?
Why didn't she make it happen when she was in the WH?

8 years of slowly letting the people starve only to culminate in an invasion, the purpose of which she supported.

So why didn't her administration deal with the "problem" during the 8 years she was in there?

It would have saved us a trillion dollars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. You are beginning to come off as insane.
It was her husband's administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. So I can discount all that "experience" right?
Thanks for the personal attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. not all of it
just 29 years of it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:47 AM
Original message
you are welcome.
You want dangle a strawman as an argument --you get what you deserve.

How about a little intellectual honesty from you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
10. Here is a fair question for you.
Imagine Hil at a quiet breakfast with Bill, or perhaps sleeping next to him - a quiet moment between them.

Do you really believe they did not discuss EVERYTHING? Hillary is a very intelligent and interested person, right? She has a handle on ALL the issues and understand what is going on around the world.

So are you going to pretend for a minute that she was not fully aware of what was going on in Iraq during the sanctions, in America during the huge buildup of the DRUG WAR and its concurrent build up of our prisons and police force into a military-level SWAT team for every little podunk town in the country?

She knew everything that was going on, so where is your "intellectual honesty" in admitting that she shares responsibility?

She couldn't have influenced Bill? Come on.

You know she was most likely the DRIVING FORCE behind his presidency.

He is the personality, she is the brains. THAT is the subtext you Hillary supporters try to infuse into every conversation. Admit it. Be HONEST.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. How do you know she didn't?
Answer:

You don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Answer: If she DID advocate for those positions with Bill, she is a piss poor advocate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. you are assuming facts not in evidence.
All you have are speculations. I'm sorry --but I don't reach conclusions by dwelling in "fantasy land".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. She says she was a part of the Admin and must defend its record.
No amount of amateur lawyering will change that, "Ms. Facts Not in Evidence"

Oh and you have done nothing to impress me with YOUR intellectual honesty.

Was Hillary there or not? Could she exert influence on Bill or not? Was she even interested?

In either case, she needs to address them. Like it or not, she was there and has to address them.

OR stop claiming the 8 years on her resume.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. She was married to the president dumb ass
Why do you start such idiotic threads?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #21
28. No she doesn't have to.
She wasn't President Of The United States.

Yes. She was there. Yes she was involved. Yes it gave her experience she would not otherwise have.

Yes she could exert influence, that does not mean she had the deciding influence.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #21
29. Your whole position is basically assumed, hypothetical and invented
Why dont you just admit that you hate her and will insinuate or say anything to attack her? I know it, you know it, why pretend otherwise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Thanks for the compliment.
And the kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
54. We don't vote for a spouse. We vote for one person to be our president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
53. "sleeping next to him" ...holy shit ...you don't really think they actually sleep together do ya?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Doncha know? Her 'experience' is selective. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Al Gore got "experience" in the Clinton Administration also
That doesn't mean he got to make the final calls. An all or nothing argument about experience gained during the Clinton Admiinistration is silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. ding ding ding
We have a winner!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Sorry, this is NOT about Al Gore.
And he didn't have as much private time or private influence for that matter over Bill.

Who is being Intellectually Dishonest now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
17. Fair enough. Then she shouldn't try to put forth the notion
that much of her experience was earned during Bill's years in the wh.

Her claiming she wasn't aware that Bill had pardoned Marc Rich on MTP last week also seemed less than truthful. If they were/are so close, and are friends with Rich, you'd think they would have discussed this. She says things to inflate herself when it's convenient-imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. duly noted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. Some of her experioence was gained during Bill's years in the wh
Some of Bill Richardson's experience was gained then also etc. All I said was that an all or nothing criteria to judge experience on is silly. It is just as wrong to claim that Hillary Clinton gained as much experience as Bill Clinton as it is to claim that she gained no experience from those years inside the Clinton Administration.

It is fair to not automatically buy her spin on those specific aspects of experience she gained that she wants to claim and/or highlight. That is fair game to debate. But I find those who either try to claim that her experience was essentially that of a hostess, or that Hillary is personally fully responsible for every thing about Bill Clinton's record that they dislike not to be credible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Tell it to Karl Rove and his buddies. All this WILL be fair game in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Americans on the whole liked Bill Clinton's presidency
Even if some leftist activists at DU didn't. Republicans would be stupid beyond belief to attempt to turn the 2008 election into a referendum on Bill Clinton's Presidency after what they gave America as a follow up to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
43. The the Obama people are in trouble
Because from the way they are reacting to hits against their candidate, there is no way they're going to hold up against the puke slime machine. I've never seen a bigger bunch of pansies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
25. Her experience is vast and wide ranging
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton">If you bothered looking you would know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. Wow! A link to a Wiki page!
You sure did your homework!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GalleryGod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
44. Someone say "Experience" ?
Edited on Fri Jan-18-08 12:08 PM by GalleryGod


OOOPS! I meant the Jimi Hendrix poster,sorry! (LOL)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. Because We Had Saddam In A Box...
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. So why did she support the IWR?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. To Give The Inspectors Teeth
We need to look forward...

We need to pick up the ball where it is...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. But that resulted in the inspector's being PULLED OUT, not given teeth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bornskeptic Donating Member (951 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
51. There were no inspectors in Iraq
when the IWR was passed, so it doesn't make any sense to say that it resulted in their being pulled out. Nobody knows whether Saddam would have allowed them in without the IWR, but it is a historical fact that they were not admitted until after it was passed. They were pulled out when Bush decided to go to war in spite of the fact that the inspectors found nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. I no longer suspect US involvement in the JFK assassination.
It must have been the Russians or the Cubans or someone foreign. US tendency to unleash huge levels of collateral damage lead me to believe that Texas would have been nuked just to take out JFK.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Be Careful !
Bush* might nuke Afghanistan and Pakistan to get Bin Laden...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
19. Her administration?
How idiotic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Ha ha ha. Deal with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #23
32. The author of this thread is obsessed with Hillary and will say anything to further that obsession
Just do a search on his name. He lives and breathes Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. It's called a conviction. A conviction that she is a bad choice to lead the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. a bad choice?
Maybe to you she is not as good a choice as whomever you support --but a bad choice?

Do you honestly believe she is a bad choice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. The worst of the 3 still in the race, for sure.
I do not see good things happening during her administration for the reasons I have cited many times before.

Oh, I also do not favor a dynastic presidency. It's well...undemocratic .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. Uhm
The dynastic theory is ridiculous.

Cos ya know --she still has to get votes. See how that works?

I see tremendously good things happening during a Hillary administration.

But you didn't answer my question. You think she is a "bad" choice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. Semantics, semantics. I think she is the worst choice of the 3.
That's the best answer I can give.

As for the dynasty thing, it WOULD be ridiculous if it wasn't so fucking sad. Another issue where you probably should dig a little deeper into that ol' "intellectual honesty" thing.

Her candidacy is far too weak to run on its own, so it ALWAYS has been premised on the subtext of "Don't worry, Bill will be in there too."

Well, some of us don't want Bill back again and think it is a disservice to the country and, by the way, to the women's movement, to elect a woman who can only stand while propped up by the former POTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #40
46. I call bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. I call goodbye. You have already insulted me enough for one day.
I am an "insane bullshitter" so I guess we don't need to talk any further, until I get an apology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Don't hold your breath
bye bye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. No problem for me.
I guess only one of us is big enough for that kind of behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. And you're not?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
36. it appears that you have little knowledge of history
before you make yourself look any stupider, I suggest you go back and look at the politics of hate and wag the dog issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. I will gladly match my knowledge of history up against you.
In a red-hot minute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
41. Seems to me that...
Seems to me that the Clinton administration did possibly try through the sanctions. It may have been unsuccessful, but it could also be easily interpreted as a valid attempt.


Much like the valid argument that a complete blockade (sanction) of Japan may or may not have saved lives, but would cost more money in the long run in WW2, and would have absolutely prolonged the conflict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
42. Congratulations
My own personal exam - you're the winner for the most abject, moronic, bordering on the insane post of the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GalleryGod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Asbestos Suits! Git 'Em here, DUers !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #42
49. I personally think he's tied
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-18-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
52. wasnt that bill clintons administration and who was starving in iraq?
i think you have iraq and North korea confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC