Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton Claims Nevada Victory, While Obama Tries His Hand at Spin

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:15 AM
Original message
Clinton Claims Nevada Victory, While Obama Tries His Hand at Spin
Source: CQ



Clinton Claims Nevada Victory, While Obama Tries His Hand at Spin

By Marie Horrigan, CQ Staff Sun Jan 20, 12:18 AM ET

New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton won a close but clear-cut win in Saturday's Nevada Democratic presidential caucuses. The former first lady pulled in just more than half the votes with nearly all precincts reporting and held a lead of several percentage points over her chief rival for the nomination, Illinois Sen. Barack Obama.
........

Clinton secured 50.7 percent of the delegates for the next step in the process leading to the Democratic state convention on April 19 -- which is the measure by which Nevada Democrats calculated the outcome of Saturday's caucuses -- to 45.2 percent for Obama.

Given the closeness of the outcome and the fact that Democratic rules call for proportional distribution of national convention delegates, the 25 that were on the line Saturday would inevitably be split evenly between the candidates. But the Obama campaign caused a stir by spinning the outcome into a win for its candidate -- claiming he had clinched 13 of the state's national convention delegates to 12 for Clinton, based on the fact that he performed well around the state while Clinton's overall lead was built on her big edge in Clark County (Las Vegas), the state's major population center.

Both the Clinton campaign and the state Democratic Party disputed Obama's claim, noting that no national convention delegates were actually allocated on the basis of Saturday's results, only the first stage in a multi-step process.
.........

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/cq/20080120/pl_cq_politics/politics2657958_2;_ylt=AmvceeXiFDhILxJ1Vj848ces0NUE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. He Hopes no one noticed that he didn't get the most support
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I guess this is the new politics we've been told about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okasha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Not to mention the new math.
Should someone who doesn't notice that 51 is a larger number than 45 be put in charge of the national budget?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. ha ha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. There's that "hope" again eh?
Well I hope they get over it and move on just as we've been previously told to do.

You know what I'm hoping for today don't ya?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ouch!
If you're the Obama Campaign, that headline's gotta leave a mark!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. Obama
Attempting to snatch victory from the jaws of defeat. How "hopeful" is THAT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Hope is not enough--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. It's like Bush in 2000.
Obama and Bush are getting the electoral vote but not the popular mandate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. Actually, very.
He hopes he can get away with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. My, My,
Why isn't it the CLintons spinning machine ... because that is all they are good at is coming up with BS talking points to put out to the spin meisters...

Clinton lost Nevada... PERIOD... end of story... Obama has more delagates Obama wins... Is Ms. Clinton going to Contest it? Will we go to the SCOTUS?...

I don't even like the tone of the entire Clinton Campaign...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. I have heard nothing but how Gore won the popular vote for years. Suddenly the
people's vote does not count!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. For Obama, they will do anything.
They will stab their old friends in the back for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. The people that told you Obama has more delagates were wrong and do not understand the process.
The only Nevada delagates that count today are the ones to the Nevada county conventions. Of those, Hillary has over 500 more than Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Obviously the Clintons don't need to be in the WH
To get a BJ they can just come on over to DU......

Spin, Spin...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. From what I've read, you are right.
But it's very disappointing that Obama would try to pull a fast one. So much for the "new politics" and "bring us all together" bullshit.

Depressing, especially since he may be our nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. You're incorrect
Obama overwhelmed the rurals in NV (had 63% to 30% in my county) and rurals recieve more delegates per vote than metropolitan areas to encourage candidates to visit us. Obama has one more delegate than Clinton. I actually threw my caucus vote to Hillary after Edwards was not viable... am not a partial observer here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. I am correct. A message for you from the Nevada Democratic Party
http://www.nvdems.com/go/homepage-rotate/%2a%2aclarification%2a%2a-of-statement-by-nevada-democratic-party-chair-jill-derby/

**Clarification** of Statement by Nevada Democratic Party Chair Jill Derby
(Las Vegas, NV) "The Nevada Democratic Party and its officials have taken great effort to maintain our neutrality in the presidential campaign and the integrity of our process. Today, two out of three Nevadans who caucused chose a Democrat instead of a Republican for president. That is an overwhelming majority vote for a new direction. Just like in Iowa, what was awarded today were delegates to the County Convention, of which Senator Clinton won the majority. No national convention delegates were awarded

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
10. Obamanistas embrace the george- bush-won technique - pop. vote vs electoral (delegates) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. yes, lots have noticed that. All of a sudden the people's vote is mush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. last time i looked

51% meant you had more than half the vote.

Silly me.

It means means you lost Bozo when you only have 45 and some ones has 51, same way it means you lost when you only had 36 and someone else had 39.

I guess his counting comes from his Chicago days, when you play dirty to win and that money is your bank account is only resting and is for charity 4 years later.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brrrp Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Look again.
Nevada has a screwball system of proportional representation that gives extra delegates to rural areas where Barry did well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matteon Donating Member (154 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. Spin?
CNN is still reporting that Obama wone more delegates. It's only spin if it is false or misleading.

The race to the nomination is a race of delegates. If one candidate gets more delegates than the other then it is a victory, plain and simple. Pointing to the popular vote seems much more like spin because the popular vote is not what determines who wins. If Nevada handles its delegates in such a manner, that has nothing to do with the candidates. It would be stupid for Obama or his camp to ignore the fact that they got more delegates. Delegates are the key to victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. CNN is not reporting this accurately, either by choice or sheer stupidity.
In either case, they need fix their misstatement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rayofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. Delegates...
...ah, now we get to the nub of the question.

The person who can deliver a majority of delegates will be the nominee. Votes has, in the end, only a some to do with the number of delegates. There are the superdelegates - almost 20% of the total. They are representative of the party establishment, so who do you think they will support?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superdelegate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloud75 Donating Member (737 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
22. so he lied! he'll be losing a lot of respect for doing that n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matteon Donating Member (154 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. No.
If Obama claimed that he got more delegates then he told the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. The Nevada Democratic Party said .....

**Clarification** of Statement by Nevada Democratic Party Chair Jill Derby
(Las Vegas, NV) "The Nevada Democratic Party and its officials have taken great effort to maintain our neutrality in the presidential campaign and the integrity of our process. Today, two out of three Nevadans who caucused chose a Democrat instead of a Republican for president. That is an overwhelming majority vote for a new direction. Just like in Iowa, what was awarded today were delegates to the County Convention, of which Senator Clinton won the majority. No national convention delegates were awarded


http://www.nvdems.com/go/homepage-rotate/%2a%2aclarification%2a%2a-of-statement-by-nevada-democratic-party-chair-jill-derby/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elspeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
23. OK, which is it? I have been trying to get a straight answer on this since yesterday.
Did the majority of the delegates go to Obama or Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abacus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-20-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. As I understand it,
Clinton received more county delegates, but Obama will receive more state delegates which is what the final vote is based on. I believe a majority of the superdelegates will go for Hillary, eliminating Obama's chances. If that happens, I'll not be backing the Democratic nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 14th 2024, 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC