|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 10:50 AM Original message |
Sun-Times columnist: Obama 'Rezko' comment 'borders on falsehood' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
1. Typical Obama behavior. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
2. "Ken Lay supported Ann Richards as I recall" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 10:57 AM Response to Reply #2 |
10. did he sell her a $1,900,000 house for $300,000 less than he paid for it ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soundguy (205 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:18 AM Response to Reply #10 |
21. Screw The House Did You See The Lot? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ccpup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:22 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. the lot doesn't matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:30 AM Response to Reply #21 |
33. i missed that.. thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:43 AM Response to Reply #21 |
36. you are not being truthful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 12:18 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. sorry, i just got to relating Rethug Senators Wives Charitys laundering money for them, got carried |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
3. ...another link, ...>>Link>> |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ccpup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
4. nobody had an inkling there were any problems? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNDemNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
5. Lighten up, he pushed the wrong button... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
6. Expect Obama to start using the Karl Rove authored "I can't comment on an ongoing investigation" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mckeown1128 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:26 AM Response to Reply #6 |
28. uh oh... you stepped in it again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
7. So this is something else Obama can't give a straight answer to? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ccpup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:07 AM Response to Reply #7 |
15. yes and no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:09 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. That seems to be the word for the week ( Whoops) for the Obama campaign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ccpup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:16 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. but, hey, if I were an Obama Supporter, I'd be upset |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glowing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
8. Its worse than Bush saying he'd never met Abramhoff.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
9. Rezko doesn't matter, folks. Obama supporters will ignore anything bad about their candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EmperorHasNoClothes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
11. I seem to remember someone else being associated with some unsavory people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:04 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. Was it the Clinton's that brought the Federal Indictment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EmperorHasNoClothes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:25 AM Response to Reply #14 |
27. As usual, you completely missed my point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:28 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. As usual your deflection shield is not working. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
12. "Nobody had an inkling that he was involved in any problems" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:08 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. link> |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ccpup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:11 AM Response to Reply #12 |
18. some links for you: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 12:33 PM Response to Reply #18 |
38. Good work. What happens if Obama is the nominee and gets indicted? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angie_love (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
13. You missed the other part of the article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ccpup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:13 AM Response to Reply #13 |
19. Norman Hsu? Oh, you mean THIS Norman Hsu! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:29 AM Response to Reply #19 |
32. this is F'n peanuts compared to what they get from Pharma, Oil and Tobacco, except Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ccpup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:32 AM Response to Reply #32 |
34. I attempting to enlighten the Poster I originally responded to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sam sarrha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:18 AM Response to Reply #13 |
22. Hsu wasnt in the employ of hillery, i doubt there was a conspiracy, except in your own mind. similar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ccpup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:23 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Mark Gorenberg -- introduced to Barack by Hsu -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:24 AM Response to Reply #13 |
26. no I didn't. The article is about Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rndmprsn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
25. two words...norman hsu |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ccpup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:29 AM Response to Reply #25 |
31. well, actually ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
29. "Ken Who?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
35. "he was somebody who I knew" I see the point: Rezko is somebody he knew |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CyberPieHole (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
39. Obama and Rezko are tied together whether Obama likes it or not... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 12th 2024, 09:41 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC