Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Clinton is not "taking on the corporate media." Bill made the MSM what it is today!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:01 AM
Original message
Bill Clinton is not "taking on the corporate media." Bill made the MSM what it is today!
Edited on Sat Jan-26-08 10:20 AM by IndianaGreen
Those suffering from Clinton nostalgia seem to suffer also from short-term memories. Bill Clinton is the father of media concentration!

Clear Channel radio stations organized "Support the Troops" rallies which were nothing more than propaganda to get public behind the invasion of Iraq.

One big happy channel?

The Telecommunications Reform Act handed over control of the radio airwaves to a chosen few. Will TV be next?

Editor's note: Second in a series on the consolidation of power and ownership in the media landscape.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Eric Boehlert


June 28, 2001 | Pomp and circumstance ruled at the signing into law of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Held inside the rotunda of the Library of Congress, a bill-signing first, the ceremony featured an array of bipartisan legislators praising the comprehensive package. Newly appointed Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich heralded the act as a jobs and knowledge bill. Vice President Al Gore stressed how public interest was central to the telecommunications revolution.

After speaking by videoconference with students at Calvin Coolidge High School in Washington, Gore watched as President Clinton signed the bill using the same pen President Eisenhower did in 1957 to sign the bill that created the interstate highway system, which had been written by ex-Sen. Gore, D-Tenn., the vice president's father. Clinton then used a digital pen to sign an electronic copy to be posted on the Internet.

In his remarks that day Clinton boasted that the "landmark legislation fulfills my administration's promise to reform our telecommunications laws in a manner that leads to competition and private investment, promotes universal service and provides for flexible government regulation."

Five years later nobody doubts that the law was indeed a landmark -- not only because congressional efforts to update the country's vast communications industries for the first time since the 1930s had themselves dragged on through the '80s and well into the '90s but also because the Telecom Act, as it became known, unleashed unprecedented deregulation and media consolidation, among the most pronounced in American history.

Nowhere has that consolidation been more acutely felt than in radio -- where just two companies, Clear Channel and Infinity, now dominate the nation's commercial radio stations. The result, many longtime radio industry observers feel, has been the degradation of commercial radio as a creative, independent medium.

http://archive.salon.com/tech/feature/2001/06/28/telecom_dereg/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Media and the Election
This 2004 article is still relevant today.

Published on Monday, November 22, 2004 by CommonDreams.org
Media and the Election
by Jeff Cohen


We can thank Clinton's Telecommunications "Reform" Act of 1996 for the right-wing Clear Channel's dominance of radio and for the right-wing Sinclair Broadcast Group becoming the biggest TV chain in the country. Clear Channel owned 40 radio stations before the Telecom bill and 1200 soon after. Sinclair had 11 stations before the bill, and now has 62 TV stations.

TV news is dominated by 5 corporations.

NBC, CNBC, MSNBC are owned by GE. When I worked at MNSBC, some of the constraints imposed on the "Donahue" show were the result of GE ownership and a conservative NBC boss who'd come out of GE Financial and GE's plastics division.

Fox News is owned by the right-wing Rupert Murdoch (and News Corporation), and does Murdoch's ideological bidding.

ABC is owned by Disney. You'll remember that CEO Michael Eisner said that Disney wouldn't distribute "Fahrenheit 911" because Disney "didn't want to be in the middle of a politically-oriented film during an election year." Eisner's comment was allowed to pass only because so few people realize that Disney is one of the biggest purveyors of political opinion this election year and every recent election year -- almost all of it right-wing political opinion. Each day in major radio markets nationwide, Disney radio stations serve up hour after hour of Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Laura Ingraham, Matt Drudge, etc. etc.

CBS News, owned by Viacom, got taken in by forged documents -- and then censored accurate reporting critical of Bush, apparently at the behest of Viacom's CEO, Sumner Redstone. Six weeks before the election Redstone endorsed Bush on behalf of Viacom: "From a Viacom standpoint, the election of a Republican administration is a better deal. Because the Republican administration has stood for many things we believe in, deregulation and so on."

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/1122-31.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. It probably represents the greatest threat to our Republic /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. Telecom Act partially to blame for Iraq war
Edited on Sat Jan-26-08 10:15 AM by FreakinDJ
If not for corporate shills disguised as media parroting Rove talking points in the lead up to the invasion of Iraq we would not be there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. and for the MSM becoming megaphones for Bush regime
No wonder many Americans think Iraq was behind 9-11 and that Iran is a terrorist state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Exactly - well said indianagreen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. I don't care if he pulled the media out of his hat. He took them on & now they're ganging up on him
and you're turning your back on him out of sheer spitefullness and overwhelming bitterness, but what else is new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. The Clintons are manipulating the media to destroy Obama, and the MSM is happy to go along
because they think, as their corporate owners believe, that Hillary will be easier to beat by GOP than Obama.

This is also the reason MSM has purposely ignored or marginalized Edwards. They are fearful of his message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Remember when Sumner Redstone said Kerry would be a better prez, but Bush would be better for Viacom
-during an interview with Tina Brown, former Vanity Fair editor, on MSNBC in 2004. Tina seemed aghast Sumner would freely admit this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. You just don't understand the issues and what BC did in terms
of telecom deregulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. And the Clintons' silence on the issue overall
The only time they have even acknowledged the issue is when it suits their own purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. Really? I thought it was Teagan, the think tanks, the purchase by corporations
Edited on Sat Jan-26-08 10:26 AM by robbedvoter
Richard Mellon Scaife, the Arkansas project....But you guys wouldn't say anything about reagan!
And that law - voted by GOP congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Regan started the job -- Bill and Bush finished it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Same with NAFTA and fast tracking our labor overseas.
People just don't understand how devastating the Clinton Presidency was because they haven't really read critically. They focus on the scandals but the real Clinton legacy is further pushing corporate power and liberty at the expense of individuals. He was part of the Conservative agenda, not opposed to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. We are still paying for the Clinton legacy, at a very personal level
Yesterday it was announced that another Indiana factory will be closing at year's end. The jobs are going to Mexico! The company boasted of saving millions of dollars. I am sure that those aboard Hillary's Investor Class Express bus will see their portfolios increase in value, just as they did after NAFTA.

Meanwhile, the working class continues to suffer, and the capitalists continue to prosper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Just one of the "little problems" with corporate free trade
The unemployed workers can just get retrained for other jobs that don't exist or which will shortly be outsourced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. God I wish this were a Big Issue in the current campaigns
IMO it is a core issue, and Bill Clinton was one of the major culprits in accelerating the mess we have today with the Totalitarian Corporate Media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. It began with the repeal of Fairness Doctrine
which I noticed none of the top two candidates are talking about, anymore than no Democrat in recent history has spoken about repealing Taft-Hartley.

Clinton's 1996 Telecom Act was the coup the grace, and accelerated media consolidation which has brought us the current mess we find ourselves in, including the morphing of news into entertainment shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. Thank you Indiana Green. BC is the godfather of telecom deregulation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC