Unsane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-26-08 10:05 PM
Original message |
More people voted for Barack Obama tonight than voted in the entire '04 primary PUT TOGETHER |
City Lights
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-26-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message |
Unsane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-26-08 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
jillan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-26-08 10:07 PM
Response to Original message |
Frances
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-26-08 10:09 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I hope the enthusiasm continues through the general election.
All I ask is that we all remember we are Dems and truly come together at that time.
|
hisownpetard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-26-08 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
hisownpetard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-26-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Getting people involved in the process is a wonderful thing. I'm really happy |
LiberalFighter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-26-08 10:23 PM
Response to Original message |
7. The numbers that matter if any are how many compared to 2004 |
|
Not to the earlier primaries.
South Carolina is 24th in population
While Vermont is 50th, New Hampshire 42nd and Iowa is 30th.
Using figures that are meaningless does not give one credibility.
|
tabasco
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-26-08 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. Voter turnout is extremely important. |
|
I'm not sure how you could not understand that.
Every primary has shown a great increase in Democratic voter turnout.
That is a very important number.
Your ignorant post doesn't do much for your credibility.
|
LiberalFighter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-26-08 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. Read my post. If you couldn't understand it then it is you that don't understand. |
|
Numbers by themselves are useless.
To say that the there was a great increase in Democratic voter turnout without basing it on prior turnout is ridiculous. If there is an substantial increase in turnout compared to 2004 or 2000 then it is important.
Where are the turnout numbers for 2004? Not mention of it in the posting. What are the numbers for this primary? Without those numbers one cannot gauge the the possibilities.
And for the poster stating that the turnout was more than the earlier primaries combined is another useless statement. Unless those other states have nearly the same population as South Carolina it is an incredibly worthless comparison.
|
gristy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-27-08 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. I think the OP is saying that more voters in SC voted for Obama in their Dem primary |
|
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 12:32 AM by gristy
than voted for all the Dem candidates in their '04 primary.
If Obama got 55% of the total Dem vote in SC in '08, then I think this means that for this to be true, the total Dem vote must have increased by at least 100*(1/.55 - 1)% = 81.8%, when comparing their '08 primary to their '04 primary.
From this link www.ajc.com/news/content/news/stories/2008/01/22/delegates_0123.html we have
"Total vote-wise, Clinton has received 436,000, Obama 105,000 and Edwards 49,000"
I can't find the '04 numbers. Looked at www.scvotes.org/statistics/election_returns but can't find it there. If I could find the total Dem primary voters for '04, we could easily see if the increase was indeed 81%. Certainly wouldn't surprise me.
|
stravu9
(945 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-26-08 10:26 PM
Response to Original message |
8. So I guess Cousin Pookie and Uncle Ray-Ray DID make it to the polls! |
HILLBILL
(35 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-26-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message |
|
South Carolina is the largest state population wise and by far the largest black vote of the primaries so far so that is TRULY AMAZING:crazy:
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 12:17 AM
Response to Original message |