CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 12:53 PM
Original message |
WTF??? So now it's "your candidate's criminals are bigger criminals than my candidate's"? |
robbedvoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message |
1. As fun as "My candidate's Kennedys are cooler than your candidate's Kennedys" |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-28-08 12:56 PM by robbedvoter
GD-P - learn to love it! :rofl:
|
CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. did you see the latest Tom Tomorrow? |
robbedvoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. I still think he didn't check our forum - we're funner! |
bidenista
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 12:56 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I'm giddy with the inspiration of it all.
|
TechBear_Seattle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 12:56 PM
Response to Original message |
|
All of the candidates without criminal backing have already been forced from the race because they were "unelectable."
What does that say about American politics?
|
Tulkas
(592 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Yes, it is a matter of degree, no politician is "pure" to many power hungry people trying to exploit |
|
their position.
The difference is that Obama made one mistake that totaled 86k, While the Clintons have built a dynasty on lobbyists and power brokers. The China thing keeps coming back and Hillary already gave back 850,000. Almost 10X as much as Obama's Rezko problem.
Choosing the lesser evil is.... LESS EVIL!!!!
Choosing the greater evil is ....... well you know
|
papau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message |
7. No - it is your candidate had a business relationship with crook - mine did not |
golddigger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
Tulkas
(592 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-28-08 01:14 PM by Tulkas
wtf is the matter with you ???
SHE CREATED A DOCUMENT FOR HER FIRM THAT WAS USED TO COMMIT FRAUD!!!
That is a proven fact, it can't be denied.
It is just not possible to prove that she knew it would be used that way, also can't be proved she did not know.
Your candidate was involved in committing fraud, mine was not.
Talk about a business relationship, Hillary Was Employed by a criminal!
|
ieoeja
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
12. I think he meant the same thing. |
|
When he said "in business with", I assumed he meant the Clinton's investment in Whitewater. This is, as I note elsewhere, compounded by the fact that Clinton was also responsible for policing the activities in Whitewater.
So Rezmar is to Obama what Whitewater was to Clinton except that Obama was not invested in Rezmar and had no power/responsibility to police Rezmar.
|
papau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
14. Clinton purchased a lot from the fellows development via a bank loan - not quite "in business with" |
papau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
13. She produced a standard document - no fraud on her part - why try to imply a lie? |
ieoeja
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
11. Also regulatory oversight of the crook while he committed his crime - mine did not. n/t |
papau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
15. So Obama is responsible for all Federal Oversight errors - you are desperate |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-28-08 01:24 PM by papau
|
ProSense
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message |
10. What I find funny is how some people participate in questionable threads about Obama, then |
papau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
16. Rezko did not bundle the lawyers money for Clinton - and you know that - desperate shall we say? |
mtnsnake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
17. You must love this. It almost makes everyone forget how awful Kerry's campaign was |
|
"I wanted John McCain for my VP, but I had to settle for Edwards" :evilgrin:
|
CatWoman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
Who needs a fucking tv or cd player with DU:P around?
:hi:
|
mtnsnake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
20. haha, it sure beats everything else, doesn't it |
allinktup
(318 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-28-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message |
18. I gotta agree with you on this one |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 09:19 PM
Response to Original message |