Half of the people here are backing a loser.

[PinkTiger]

The trick is, who?
At the moment I'm very upset with one of these candidates for being a churlish prig!
But I'm not telling who! So there!
LOL

[ErnestoG]

1. That's ok. You'll forgive Hillary eventually.

[PinkTiger]

2. Good try.

I'm still not telling.

[ErnestoG]

11. You don't have to. It doesn't take Madame Cleo here...

[CoffeeCat]

3. Can you give us a hint?

How old she?

[PinkTiger]

4. The point is, it doesn't matter!

Everybody here is mad at one or the other candidate, right? It is silly. Let's all get along.

[CoffeeCat]

8. No seriously...

Did his father ever work in a mill?

[melody]

5. Depends upon one's definition of the word "loser" ;)

:)

[PinkTiger]

6. In the end, only one can prevail.

That is what I mean. The other is the "loser," and in the end what will happen?

[melody]

9. This isn't the Superbowl. Our duty as citizens isn't to pick the winner

It's to choose the candidate we feel best able to lead. If we did otherwise, we'd be like all the other
sleepwalking masses who toss a coin between Democrats and Republicans.

When the time comes that there are only two candidates, I'll make my choice between them. And whomever is
the Democratic nominee, I'll support.

[2rth2pwr]

7. Is this some kind of new math?

[scheming daemons]

10. If we keep talking about silly things like handshakes...

...then ALL of us will backing a loser.... because the GOP will hold the White House.

Independent voters won't take serious a group of idiots who act like they're in junior high school and focus on meaningless shit like handshakes.

Maybe Obama can make it up to Hillary by asking her to the prom.

sheesh...

[nolabels]

12. Shouldn't it be MORE than half ?

Like there is more than two choices and it appears they are all well spread out


P.S. don't forget about those undercover freepers, they probably got some different choices too :-)

[dkf]

13. I'm finding this rather amusing.