NashVegas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 07:54 AM
Original message |
I Was Thinking About That Much-Rumored Sex Scandal |
|
And if it is what I suspect it is, or along those lines, this candidate had better have a damn good way to handle it. Or better yet, they'd better get it out in the open, now.
The LA Times & NT Times might be happy to sit on it right through November, but honeys, Little Green Footballs ain't gonna.
|
jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 07:56 AM
Response to Original message |
1. What do you suspect it is? |
Cooley Hurd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 07:57 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I haven't heard about it - who's involved?:shrug:
|
NashVegas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
using the words primaries and sex and scandal and LA Times.
And when my source said “everyone in Washington”, knows about it he means everyone in the elite Mainstream media, not just the LA Times, but everyone regularly writing about the Presidential campaign knows about it and doesn’t know what to do with it. And I must admit it really is was juicy if true. But I don’t know if it’s true and I can’t decide if I think it’s relevant. But the fact that “everyone” in the elite media knew about it and was keeping silent about it, is, itself, news. But you can’t report the “news” without reporting the thing itself. Troubling"
With or without intending to (probably with) some DUers have been hinting away, very, very subtly. I'm not sure it's relevant, either, but it could cost some votes among some key demos.
|
Cooley Hurd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. The first two entries that came up were from RW blogs... |
|
...hardly ironclad sources.;)
|
FormerDittoHead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
31. ...since when did the truth become important in political campaigns...? n/t |
FormerDittoHead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
33. Clinton, and it's not Bill. This has already been discussed here, but not the MSM... yet. n/t |
Cooley Hurd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-30-08 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #33 |
39. What utter horseshit... |
|
The "gay Hillary" rumors have been around for eons, perpetuated by the same lying goofballs on the right. :thumbsdown:
|
Skidmore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 07:58 AM
Response to Original message |
3. What the hell are you talking about? |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-29-08 08:11 AM by Skidmore
Why are you coming here with innuendo that sounds like it could be straight from Freeperville?
|
NashVegas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
35. If You Have to Ask ... |
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:00 AM
Response to Original message |
4. It's absolutely untrue |
|
that John Edwards is the father of Jamie Spears' baby. Knock it off.
|
LiberalFighter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
27. Edwards wouldn't do something like that. The Spears family are poison to be around. |
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #27 |
30. That's why it's a scandal! |
|
When he knocked up Pamela Anderson, nobody batted an eye.
|
LiberalFighter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #30 |
32. Ewww I wouldn't go near that girl with an eleven foot pole |
MethuenProgressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:02 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Barack Obama's mistress, Chelsea Clinton, is carrying John Edwards' love child. |
bklyncowgirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
SteppingRazor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
had to get Drudge's signature line in on that one ;)
|
DrDan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:06 AM
Response to Original message |
6. so what is the point of this post . . . |
|
"if it is what I suspect it is . . . . "
what does that mean?
|
angie_love
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:07 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I heard on the news that the NYPOST is compiling a list of women Bill has slept w/ since hes left office. So I'm not sure how true that is, I heard it a few days ago.
|
ursi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. that Bowser dude was on Bill Maher insinuating that Rupert Murdoch |
|
would dump crap like this once Clinton got the nomination.
|
angie_love
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
I don't know this makes me nervous if Hillary gets the nom. You know they'll spring this shit a few days before the election in November.
|
ursi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
14. yeah, Bowser dude was implying that Rupert Murdoch was setting Clinton up for this |
|
to happen in the fall. I just can't remember what else he said ...such as proof.
|
rox63
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
28. I've heard this rumor as well |
|
Maybe that's why Murdoch is so supportive oh Hillary getting the nomination. He's been collecting dirt on the Clintons for years. And I'm sure Bill hasn't been a choirboy since leaving the WH.
|
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:39 AM
Response to Original message |
13. I think it is despicable that you would attack Hillary Clinton about her personal life like this! |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-29-08 08:39 AM by JVS
Who she has sex with is not our business.
|
ursi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
goldcanyonaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. Nope, it's a Hillary lebian affair that they're trying to sell. |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-29-08 08:45 AM by goldcanyonaz
Typical of the vast RW.
|
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
19. I hadn't heard of that one. But we really shouldn't dwell on her personal life like you're doing. |
ursi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
23. no, bowser said it was about Bill and his alleged antics since leaving office |
|
I never did buy into the Hillary lesbian plot.
|
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
17. No I'm talking about the outrage of scandalmongering about how she fulfills her womanly needs. |
|
It's none of our business what she does in the privacy of her own home.
|
Yossariant
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
24. Sounds like another one of Barack's fairy tales |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-29-08 08:55 AM by Yossariant
:rofl:
|
jbnow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
34. I'd say one of Bill's, he'd like that nt |
LiberalHeart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-30-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
41. Or maybe the snub at the SOTU was a lover's spat. |
NashVegas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
mondo joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
20. I thought it was about Obama getting a hummer from another man. |
Yossariant
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
22. Even if he is and even if he were to be a Muslim |
|
this has no place in our political discourse.
|
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
25. I try to take the High Road (tm) and prevent people from smearing your candidate about her sexlife.. |
|
and this is the kind of candidate trashing your respond with. Shame on you
|
mondo joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #25 |
26. You said you thought it was about Hillary. I thought the rumor was about Obama. |
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #26 |
36. No, I'm scolding the OP for rumormongering against Clinton |
|
You are insinuating that there is an Obama sex scandal. Shame on you and your mudslinging ways.
|
mondo joe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #36 |
37. I'm not insinuating that there is a rumor. There actually is one. |
|
If I were insinuating that it was true, that would be another story.
|
2rth2pwr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-30-08 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #36 |
40. At least he wasn't using when it happened. nt |
Yossariant
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
21. Totally agree -- just like religion, it |
|
should not be fodder for political speculation.
|
LiberalFighter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-29-08 09:18 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Rudy being a transvestite? Mitt in love with his hair and skin? McCain never getting enough hugs from Bush? Huckleberry has a fascination with necrophilia when others mention homosexuality?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 11th 2024, 11:28 AM
Response to Original message |