Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are you afraid of the fight?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 12:22 PM
Original message
Are you afraid of the fight?
As a Hillary supporter, I expect a fight. If she's the nominee,
I expect all the old playbooks will be dusted off and all the
old talking points, which came to naught but a consensual blowjob,
will be rallied around. But she's been vetted, for eight years and
more but she's held her own and gained the respect of many
Republicans in Congress and in her state. Her longtime record
of public service is bedrock. She's a centrist Democrat and so is Obama.
His votes are rarely different than any of the centrists in Congress.
He knew he was going to run prior to running for the Senate and
he's played his cards safely these two years.

He was anti-war, but not at Senator at the time of the vote
to authorize force after diplomacy. I think lots of his supporters
would be surprised to hear that.

He's not progressive and he doesn't talk about removing troops now
from Iraq or Afghanistan. He's agreed with Bush policies and he's
voted to keep the war funded.

He's got real problems with his deals and ties to Tony Rezko and people haven't
woken up to that yet, but Republicans will wake them up with that and
more. You think the "Obama, Osama, Hussein" thing will be the worst?

If your stomach churns at the thought of the Republican talking points
against Hillary, buy a large bottle of Tums, put your gloves on and
get in the ring coz the fight won't be for wusses. It will be for
real Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. HRC is already mounting one of the most disgusting Rovian campaigns of modern times. How
disingenuous to portray her as waiting to fight the "good fight" against Republicans. Your post is a mirror image of her campaign and character. Thank you for mentioning Osama Hussein again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Shut your eyes to reality...but Republicans won't be as nice...
Hillary hasn't spoken ill of Obama at all as he
has of her, but for some reason people are blind
to his hiding behind his pretty words and skin
color.

Read the statements. Look at the records.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Do you think your blatant racism is endearing this former Edwards supporter to Hillary?
You're as disgusting as she is with your blatant references to race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Not my statement
I didn't invent the statement comparing his name to
terrorists and I don't use it. I respect Obama but
the Republicans won't be respecting him in the race.
It's dirty politics but it has been said and it
will be said. Shut your eyes and ears to it at your
own peril.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. There is nothing a Hillary supporter can say
that would make me want to vote for her as my first choice.

If we have a choice between two centrist democrats, Obama is the Reagan of this race and Hillary is Bob Dole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. well, one of them did a lot more damage as President....
if you are comparing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. One of them changed the face of the Republican Party
and one of them didn't.

Reagan's advisors are the ones who dictated policy. They are many of the same assholes who are now dictating policy in the Bush (figurehead) administration without any of the "realists" to rein them in.

But, you're entirely correct about the idea that, whoever wins the nomination, the republicans will be biting the heads off of chickens and blaming the democratic candidate.

they're mean and they don't care about bi-partisanship until they are the ones who've lost power. No matter who wins.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. yeah, Reagan certainly did change the party and the country...
of course as we are experiencing...not for the better.
Obama seems to have needed a refresher course on recent
history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Please. I'm not that stupid
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 02:17 PM by RainDog
I've not been an Obama supporter, though he will be my candidate now. His remarks about Reagan had NOTHING to do with Reagan's policies. Instead, he was noting Reagan's charisma, which, few would deny, was a force that brought about change... whether you liked that change or not.

Obama's remarks were not an expression of support for Reagan's policies. As others have noted today, he and Hillary have a 90% similar voting record, so you can save that b.s. for someone who just jumped off the turnip truck. He, as are all those who are running, is a politician, and I have no doubt his remarks were constructed to make independents and moderate republicans associate Obama's candidacy with the upbeat mood among those who liked Reagan after the hostage crisis in Iran (and, yeah, I know the Oct. Surprise was a illegal action to swing the race to Reagan...) it's not about reality, it's not about the steak. It's about the sizzle.

America has been humiliated by Bush and his middle eastern messes. Americans don't want to feel like jerks who support torture and rape of children that is sanctioned by the president.

I am not so naive as to assume that politicians do not try to tactically appeal to voters by saying things to sway them away from another candidate. In this case, Hillary was not the candidate. Instead, Obama was going after the independent vote.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. It'd be a nice story if it were true.
But it's all a load of crap.

"He was anti-war, but not at Senator at the time of the vote
to authorize force after diplomacy. I think lots of his supporters
would be surprised to hear that."

And his opponent was a Senator at the time, and DID think a war in Iraq would be a good idea. I suspect a lot of her supporters felt the same way.

"He's not progressive and he doesn't talk about removing troops now
from Iraq or Afghanistan. He's agreed with Bush policies and he's
voted to keep the war funded."

Obama does talk about removing troops as quickly as possible. Obama's always been against the war, and will not vote for funding that does not have a timetable for withdrawal.

"He's got real problems with his deals and ties to Tony Rezko and people haven't
woken up to that yet, but Republicans will wake them up with that and
more. You think the "Obama, Osama, Hussein" thing will be the worst?"



"If your stomach churns at the thought of the Republican talking points
against Hillary, buy a large bottle of Tums, put your gloves on and
get in the ring coz the fight won't be for wusses. It will be for
real Democrats."

The reason I'm supporting Obama is because he is a real democrat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Truth is....
1. You didn't refute the statement I made that he was anti-war AND not a Senator having to vote on that.
2. He has voted for war funding except for the votes he wasn't present for.
3. Obama is a real Democrat...a centrist one and always has been.

There are no progressives in this race, so we all have to work for one
of these two to get a Democrat in office next year because we can't
afford another Republican. I know Hillary can do this job without a lot
of advisors or on the job training.

If you want to post the photo of Rezko, it might be more honest
to mention that Rezko helped Obama buy his house and the lot next
to it and that Obama did favors for him while in the Chicago state
legislature. That might be more relevant than one of millions of
photos the Clintons have taken with people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Nope, sorry.
Not true either.

"1. You didn't refute the statement I made that he was anti-war AND not a Senator having to vote on that."

This is technically true. But he would have voted against it had he been a senator, as opposed to Clinton. Who sent 3941 of our young men and women off to die for a lie.

"2. He has voted for war funding except for the votes he wasn't present for."

Simply untrue. He famously voted "nay" on HR 2206, one of the few democrats who did. He will not vote on any funding that doesn't include a withdrawal date.

"3. Obama is a real Democrat...a centrist one and always has been."

Obama is a progressive democrat, Clinton's a conservative dem. Before that she was a young republican.

"I know Hillary can do this job without a lot
of advisors or on the job training."

On the job training? WTF? Are you saying Hillary Clinton's experienced at the job because she's related to a former president? They made the same dumb argument about Bush Jr.

"If you want to post the photo of Rezko, it might be more honest
to mention that Rezko helped Obama buy his house and the lot next
to it and that Obama did favors for him while in the Chicago state
legislature. That might be more relevant than one of millions of
photos the Clintons have taken with people."

Rezko's a red herring. Really Whitewater type bullshit, very ironic coming from Clinton or her supporters. The only thing it does is make people who bring up Rezko look stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. well, you're wrong
Obama is a centrist. His voting record says nothing
progressive.
You can delude yourself with half truths and no truth
but the truth is that Tony Rezko had a 17 year relationship
with Obama, giving him personal and bundled monies.
Obama wrote a letter on his behalf to gain a
$14 million dollar taxpayer funded housing project
that Rezko benefitted from greatly.

I intend working for whoever the Dem candidate is,
will you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Do you really believe that?
Because I sure don't.

You're making yourself sound very silly.

"I intend working for whoever the Dem candidate is,
will you?"

If you care so much about the party, what's with the stupid, untrue slurs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC