Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palmieri says Edwards-Clinton the same

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 06:31 PM
Original message
Palmieri says Edwards-Clinton the same
One of Edwards' campaign strategist says Edwards and Clinton have the same policies for the poor. She says the anti-establishment people would like Obama.

I think people are believing their own campaign hype is what I think. Edwards and Clinton do not remotely have the same idea for the poor, I think Mudcat clearly gets that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. But of course you'd think that. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I thought it was Hillbama
Now an Edwards' strategist tells me Edwards and Clinton are the same.

I'm genuinely confused.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Edwards and Clinton win the working class vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. which only proves that poorer workers routinely vote against their best interests
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LVjinx Donating Member (711 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
5.  poorer workers routinely vote against their best interests
Poor are voting Clinton/Edwards, and Obama is getting the rich and elite... I wonder if you think they are just voting against their own interests for the fun of it? There couldn't be an underlying cause that we might be refusing to see...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. funny - I see Clinton getting rich & elite as well as Obama. Why do the poor vote
against their interests? Because MSM presents what suits its corporate masters so they can "sell" the candidate of their choice.

Any other questions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Edwards is richer than either of them
:shrug:

The size of someone's bank account is not a measure of their sincerity in helping working people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. sorry - i meant "getting support from the rich & elite" - not the candidates own wealth
my bad - I wasn't clear...

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. It takes that to win elections
If Edwards were winning, he'd have gotten those millions too. What do you think would happen financially if Edwards were the Democratic nominee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. How elitist of you. Maybe the poor shouldn't even be allowed to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. if only MSM (Murdoch anyone) would present the facts about each & every candidates positions
and fact check their speeches then perhaps people would have a better idea of who would best represent them and their interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. If only there was this place people could go
and find out what the candidates said for themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. believe it or not a lot of older voters don't have internet and are not comfortable with it
They rely on traditional media.

Traditional media (M$M) has let us down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. I live in a retirement town
Old people are online almost as much as young ones and talk more about the issues too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. fair enough - but of my 80 year old mom and her friends only one has a computer
they all rely on the local newspaper and evening news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Samantha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Edwards apologized for his support of the resolution which gave
Bush the authority to launch a preemptive war. He referred to his vote as a BIG MISTAKE.

Hillary refuses to apologize for that vote to this day.

To me, that is a HUGE difference.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClericJohnPreston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't think
you ever think. Just sayin.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. I think Edwards and Clinton are more alike (more progressive) on economy... yeah.
And they're also more alike healthcare and energy policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. That's just crazy, it just is
Unless you mean alike in supporting NAFTA and China trade and forcing people to give all their money to insurance companies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Sorry but it's more about his stimulus package.
He seems to back tax cuts instead of aid to help the poor... and it doesn't have the alternative energy stuff that Endwards & Clinton do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. He supports FICA tax cuts and senior citizen benefits
That's what he supported. The alternative energy plans are in his economic package because a stimulus is immediate and completely different than long term energy projects.

Stimulus:
http://www.barackobama.com/2008/01/13/barack_obama_announces_plan_to.php

Economy
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/economy/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClericJohnPreston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Bwahahahahaha
the ubiquitous link, always the links.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. FICA tax cuts... I like removing the cap... that idea I like...
"long-term energy projects"... I don't like that. Why would it take more than 30 days to get it off the ground?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. The point is whether it's immediate stimulus
Long term projcts don't provide immediate stimulus. They're also the kind of thing that are likely to end up being give-aways to friendly corporations, as opposed to a true energy strategy. I don't think it's the kind of thing one would vote no on, but I see why it isn't part of a stimulus package proposal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. Long-term projects have to start... and the people working on them have to be paid.
I still don't see why these projects can't be started in 30 days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awaysidetraveler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
21. Obama's been working on poverty and civil rights for the last twenty-five years.
His politics are clearly staked in that ground. It is incorrect to say that there is no difference
between Hillary's and Obama's position on poverty: Obama's stake is personal.

“I'm in this race for the same reason that I fought for jobs for the jobless and hope for the hopeless on the streets of Chicago; for the same reason I fought for justice and equality as a civil rights lawyer; for the same reason that I fought for Illinois families for over a decade… That's why I'm running, Democrats — to keep the American Dream alive for those who still hunger for opportunity, who still thirst for equality.”

— Barack Obama, Speech in Des Moines, IA, November 10, 2007
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Obama actually has a proven stake
and it doesn't include abandoning people in the name of ending big government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
26. I find Clinton and Obama to be the same..
whereas Edwards stands off to the left from those too. I also do not expect much to change when either HRC or Obama are on the Hill, I really dont.

And if a repiglican was to take the Hill, which will not happpen, we are really and truely FUCKED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Be specific
Because I'm really fed up with that line when Obama has the record on making change for working people and the poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC