Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I wish Ron Paul wasn't a racist homophobic crazoid

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:13 PM
Original message
I wish Ron Paul wasn't a racist homophobic crazoid
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 09:15 PM by Richardo
His monologue on Iraq was worthy of the most anti-war Dem.

Don't worry, I'm not a Paulist. It's just amazing that he's even allowed to participate in a GOP debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. I know. Most of us wish that.
Not all, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. agreed


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. i agree
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 09:15 PM by fenriswolf
politics aside. I understand his economics pretty well but think he went about presenting himself all wrong. His forign policy was spot on. Just wish he wasn't so pro free market and such a racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hill_YesWeWill Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
29. Not to mention anti-abortion! he would never have gotten this far
as a democratic candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm glad he is.
It keeps people from supporting his utterly suicidal economic and domestic policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. There's also the whole "New World Order" thing. He's certifiable.
His opposition to the Iraq war is built on this same shoddy foundation of far-right conspiracism and extremist belief systems, particularly long-debunked theories about the "New World Order," the Federal Reserve and our monetary system, the IRS, and the education system.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Don't get me wrong - I find nothing to applaud him on except his Iraq policy
I just came in in the middle of his monologue and heard some common sense. Last thing I expected in a GOP debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I know. I know. I understand viscerally the charm of Paul's message.
Who wouldn't be charmed? He's anti-war, anti-torture, anti-drug war, and anti-corporation -- a real progressive dream date.

Until you reflect on the fact that he's also anti-choice, anti-gay, anti-environment, anti-sane immigration policy, and anti-separation of church and state as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. ;-)
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. He's on the right side of exactly ONE thing.
Maybe two, if you count the War On Drugs. But even with that, he's right for the wrong reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. I wish he didn't hate the American Political system of government as well.
But that goes hand in hand with his racist homophobic crazoidness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. He's probably full of shit about Iraq too.
I doubt he gives a shit about the troops and is just saying it because it's what people want to here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Who cares. At least he's broadcasting the truth about Iraq & thats refreshing to hear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
31. Paul actually voted against the IWR
Just because he's a nutcase doesn't mean he wasn't correct about that issue from the very beginning.

Of course, he was and is right for the wrong reasons, but he did oppose the Iraq war from the beginning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toadzilla Donating Member (814 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. well his whole wanting to dismantle most of the goverment schtick doesnt fly with me either.
but he is right about the war, and about the fed. i appreciate his voice on those issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yeah cause he is really entertaining and
personable but unfortunately he's nutz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Same as Huckabee
He's got a great personality, but... theocratic jerk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Dawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. Support Mike Gravel!
He is still in the race and opposes the occupation of Iraq and war against Iran.

http://www.gravel2008.us/issues
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
16. I just saw that too
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
18. He's right on one issue
wrong on all the others.

I don't get the admiration so many here have for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. It's frightening!!
Here's something I send to all of my progressive friends who are suckered into his few seemingly progressive ideas:
http://dneiwert.blogspot.com/2007/06/trouble-with-ron.html

<snip>

If America ever becomes a fascist state, it will be Ron Paul's long-time followers who bring it about. And we -- progressives, miniorities, feminists, gays, "intellectuals," and Jews like Maher and Stewart -- with be the first ones to feel their genocidal rage. We cannot overlook his long association with far-right extremists just because he agrees with us that the war is wrong and pot should be legal. If Bush has taught us anything, it's that we need to hold ourselves and our candidates to much higher standards than that. What we choose to overlook now, we will live to regret later.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #18
32. He's correct on MANY issues involving civil liberties
Still a nutcase, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Unless you're black. Or Brown. Or Gay. Or a woman.
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Why the eyes?
I said the guy is a nut. But you can't deny that he is on the right side of a number of issues, especially if they concern individual rights. Huckabee is correct on trade and some other economic issues, but he's still a Dominionist jackass. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. I apologize for the snark. But, he's not a friend to minorities. And I get very upset when liberals
defend him at all.

He's against affirmitive action. Against amnesty. Against stem cell research. Wants to end funding for organizations that promote abortion. Rated 0% by NARAL. Voted for Tax-credited programs for Christian schooling. Voted to BAN GAY ADOPTIONS. Wants to end preferential treatment by race in college admissions. Voted NO on increasing minimum wage. And he's all about pushing regressive taxes.


He's not worthy of any defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
20. He may be a nut case but he
is the most sane Republican of the bunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. You need to study up on him. He's not. He's an extremist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Compared with McCain, Romney and Huckleberry
he is sane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I still beg to differ. They all suck, but Ron Paul is the biggest of the bunch
1) He’s content to let genocide, wars of aggression, and human rights violations occur abroad with nothing more than a “moral statement” from the U.S.

2) Ron Paul wants to end all paper money and revert to a monetary system based on gold, which would make our nation the only government in the world to use the Gold Standard.

3) Ron Paul believes that neither the federal government nor the state government should prohibit prayer in public schools. Does this mean I can paste pictures of Vishnu all along school walls? Should teachers now allow statues of the Buddha outside the school? I wonder how long it takes until Jesus is our new national mascot.

4) Ron Paul wants to eliminate the IRS and the income tax. Sounds great right? Well, so does free ice cream and new cars for everyone, but that doesn't mean they're realistic ideas. The US. government needs money, and if you abolish the income tax, they're going to take it by other means. Only instead of taking fair amounts from people based on how much they make, the government is going to increase the sales tax. In case you weren't following, this means Ron Paul's plans will benefit the rich. Please don't shoot yourselves in the foot, don't vote for a man who only wants to help the rich. He just wants to greaten the divide between the poor and the rich, which is already overwhelming. By the way, he also wants to eliminate the departments of education, energy, homeland security, and emergency management. We're struggling to bring order to our chaotic nation as it is, don't hinder our efforts by destroying the government. Ron Paul is either an unrealistic crazy idealist or another corrupted politician. Either way, I'm not voting for him, no matter how much his internet supporters spam his name.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bidenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. re: tax
Paul is a superduperlibertarian, so I'm guessing abolishing the IRS would go with scrapping most of government. No need for alternative revenues, but not an outcome most Dems would be too thrilled about anyhow.

His war rant was the only engaging point of the debate, IMO. It's on Youtube:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhAokoMgSDc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I'm not interested in watching him. He's poison and very dangerous.
It's really easy to to charmed and googly-eyed by his stance on the war, but he comes from a very dark place. His progressive sounding ideas are rooted in very extremist right-wing ideals.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bidenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. then don't watch.
Very dangerous? I don't think so, given his chances of election are nil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. K, I won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bidenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. but i get the last word. neener neener. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. nyah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bidenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. uh-uh. it's MINE. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC