Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

About Edwards suspending his campaign...here's what I think is the likeliest reason.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BreweryYardRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:18 AM
Original message
About Edwards suspending his campaign...here's what I think is the likeliest reason.
It seems to me that Elizabeth probably has taken a turn for the worse. :( John is probably suspending the campaign to be with her, and keeping quiet about the reason to prevent a possible media circus that might make the situation even worse.

Because John Edwards is not the kind of man who would put his campaign above his wife's health. And that is a better endorsement than anyone on the Republican side can have.

And he said he was "suspending" the campaign...meaning that if Elizabeth gets better (and with any luck, she will) he could conceivably jump back into the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Yukari Yakumo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm thinking it may be a number of reasons
Your suggestion could be one of them.

Another one is when they crunched the numbers, they realized they simply didn't have the money or the resources to remain competitive against both HRC and BHO.

Third theory; They realize all he may accomplish is to piss off the establishment and mainstream Dems, especially if he is being perceived as letting his ego get the better of him. This will annihilate any political capital Edwards have have had and end his political career.

Another theory: Avoid total embarrassment, and thus preserve their message. If he got thoroughly beaten across the board this Tuesday, the value of him and his platform becomes almost worthless. Edwards may have gotten internal polling done and saw his prospects for Tuesday as dire, at bast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Levgreee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. He explicitally said it wasn't for that reason, although perhaps he just wants to keep it private nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BreweryYardRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Really? Did I miss a line in his speech?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Levgreee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. it might not have been in his speech, look around nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. I don't see why people need to speculate
He was doing poorly, and saw that he wasn't going to improve his standing next week. So he dropped out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cgrindley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. He quit because he didn't win fuck all... that's why he quit
because he couldn't win. It's not rocket science. He was losing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. Ok, that makes me feel a little bit better...
sounds realistic and quite possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:11 AM
Response to Original message
8. Edwards was frozen out just like Kucinich was frozen out. It's pretty obvious.
John Edwards isn't just the most electable Democrat—he's the best choice. But the media is starving him of the oxygen campaigns require in order to thrive: coverage. Shortly after placing second in Iowa, the Project for Excellence in Journalism found that John Edwards received a puny 7 percent of national media coverage. Clinton and Obama got between four and five times more; their poll numbers were nowhere close to that much higher than Edwards'.

"The media goes to this very engaging story about a legitimate woman candidate and a legitimate candidate with an African-American heritage, and that drives up their fund-raising numbers," Elizabeth Edwards told Time. "Then the media folks say, 'See, that proves we were right to focus on these two candidates'... It's enough to make you tear your hair out."

The New York Times' own public editor conceded that his paper had shortchanged Edwards. "In Iowa ... John Edwards is close behind Clinton in the most recent Des Moines Register poll," Clark Hoyt wrote on Nov. 18, "yet The Times has given him comparatively scant coverage. Clinton and Obama have been profiled twice each on the front page since Labor Day, but Edwards not at all this year. Throughout the paper, The Times has published 47 articles about Clinton since Labor Day, only 18 about Edwards."

"I don't track our coverage by quantity," campaign editor Richard Stevenson responded. "In a qualitative sense, we've covered him pretty thoroughly, and there is more to come."

There wasn't.

http://www.boiseweekly.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A310690
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. Corporate Amerika wasn't going to let Edwards.....
get anywhere near the White House. Gotta' keep the "pro-business" atmosphere that's doing SOOOOO well for the country intact.

I don't think it has anything to do with the Mrs.'s health. He just wasn't making a dent in the Obama "hope" offensive or the Clinton "business as usual" mantra. He was a victim of our media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BreweryYardRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yeah, but I think he'd have stayed in until the convention -- or at least Super Tuesday...
...if it was just being ignored by the media.

But family matters -- that's a whole different can of worms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BreweryYardRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. *kick*
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC