hisownpetard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 12:49 PM
Original message |
Super-Delegates: Can they subvert the wishes of the majority of voting Democrats? |
|
Are there no rules that govern them? Seems they can change candidates on a whim. Is this at all democratic? I don't know much about them, so if anyone can explain it to me, I'd really appreciate it.
|
TexasObserver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message |
1. They can, but it will be their undoing if they do |
|
Most of them have to run for office, and most of those who don't run for office have to run for DNC seats.
|
hisownpetard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
6. When they vote, is their vote public knowledge? |
TexasObserver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
Believe me, both campaigns will know who voted how, and the word will spread like wildfire.
The ones to worry about are the superDs who are retiring or retired. They might act against their constituency, because they want to feather the next bed they intend to lie in.
|
hisownpetard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:51 PM
Original message |
Interesting point. Thanks! |
hisownpetard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 01:53 PM by hisownpetard
|
SteppingRazor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Yeah, they can, if you want to look at it like that. |
|
It would be possible for one candidate to have more pledged delegates, but for the other to win because of superdelegates. That said, the superdelegates, many of whom are elected officials themselves, are well aware of what that would do to the party.
|
hisownpetard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
8. The whole concept just bothers me. Why do these delegates have a disproportionate amount of power, |
SteppingRazor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
12. Well, remember that before the post-1950s era... |
|
those party officials had ALL the power. It's only in the modern, primary-election era that voters have had much of a say. After the 1968 convention, when the party restructured how it selects candidates, it gave itself those superdelegate positions to make sure it held onto some say over who gets elected.
|
hisownpetard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
14. Thanks for the perspective on that. But are the super-delegates' votes weighted |
|
more heavily and, if so, do you happen to know the ratio they've given?
I'm new to this whole area of politics, so I appreciate your input. Thanks!
|
SteppingRazor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
20. Their votes aren't weighed more heavily, but... |
|
there are so many of them -- 796, to be precise -- that their votes can swing the nomination one way or the other, if a large majority of them decide to support one candidate. So far Hillary has 211 superdelegates to Obama's 128, with the rest standing by. That said, you have to remember that superdelegates can change their position on a whim, so their promises to vote for one candidate or another mean very little.
|
hisownpetard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
23. Ay ay ay, the tension!! The suspense!! The possibilities for all kinds of perks!!! |
rateyes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 12:53 PM
Response to Original message |
3. They can, but they'd better not. nt |
hisownpetard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
9. Why? To whom are they accountable? |
rateyes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
hisownpetard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
16. So then, their votes are made public knowledge? |
rateyes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
hisownpetard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
DJ13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message |
4. "Can they subvert the wishes of the majority of voting Democrats?" |
|
Every time I read a post like this I cant help but think this comes from a Hillary supporter.
Im not saying you're one (I dont know that), but I've seen many of these posts, and most do come from that side.
Now here my opinion on this.....
The super delegates are votes in the convention that represent office holders who have (in most cases) supported one candidate in the primaries over another.
They are as free to support whoever they like as you are.
|
mrJJ
(657 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. First time for everything |
|
Major problem... a once in a life time chance for either of the candidates to be the FIRST.
First President of Color whoose supporters mandate that their candidate tries to change the way politics are played in our USA
First Female President of an ex impeached President ... sorry couldnt help myself
No ones going to give ... This MUST be won outright in the primary by either candidate.
But will the superdelegates at the convention decide to subvert the efforts of the movement for change? I have a feeling the fix is already in.
I submit that Billary 08 will cajole or pigeon hole his former party member underlings to "follow your old leader". Loyalty to the party must trump the mandate for change. Besides new and fresh ideas are bad, scarry... The old ways are the best, stay with what we have. Paranoid? Conspiracy? No... If Sen Obama's supporters thinks he was not given a fair playing field to compete on.. these will be some of the talking points.
When that happens.... and I submit that it will. All bets will be off. Does anyone think that these newley registered and independent voters are card carrying "My democratic party right or wrong.. follow me" types? Sen Obama being a Party loyalist will make the plea to his supporters to unite behind Billary 08... my guess is that few will follow...
|
hisownpetard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. Never assume. (I voted on Tues. for Obama). |
CK_John
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Superdelegates was the price for reforms that gave us 50/50 gender delegates and 80/20% delegate |
|
selection via primaries and caucus. Without this comprise we would have 100% insider selection. A good deal IMO.
|
tritsofme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. Republicans don't have superdelegates. |
|
They trust their members to come up with a nominee.
Superdelegates are undemocratic, and their original purpose was to help those "crazy" primary voters from choosing another McGovern.
|
CK_John
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
21. McGovern was not selected until around 4:00AM by the convention, not by any |
hisownpetard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
18. OK, then it's a big improvement over what used to be. |
HughMoran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message |
IADEMO2004
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Super Delegates are not Sith Lords |
|
We elected all of them. Just because they have been active democrats more than two months they are not all evil.
|
hisownpetard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
25. I never meant to impute any judgment on them. Just trying to get some information |
|
on a topic about which I know very little.:blush:
|
mohc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
27. We didn't ellect ALL of them |
|
A large portion are DNC members, who the voting public really does not have a say in.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 11th 2024, 10:01 AM
Response to Original message |