Proud2BAmurkin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 01:11 PM
Original message |
RASMUSSEN daily tracking: Clinton 48 (+1) Obama 42 (-1) |
Renew Deal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message |
1. So you like Rassmussen today |
Rock_Garden
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message |
NJSecularist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Please tell me why you are posting national polls |
|
When ther are no national primaries any more and half the United States has already voted? :hi: :hi: :hi:
|
Proud2BAmurkin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. It's important to know who DEMOCRATIC voters support |
NJSecularist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. And you are using a poll of 500 voters to find that out? |
|
The voters have spoken. Hillary and Obama are in a dead heat in the popular vote so far.
|
Thrill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
13. Unless its a state poll. Its irrelevant |
suston96
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Why track national polls? Because the DNC and the super-delegates will be doing just that....nt |
NJSecularist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
You'll need proof for that assertion.
|
suston96
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. I never need proof for what I say because I am always right. |
|
Those polls that measure John McCain against Clinton or Obama in the general will be used precisely for that purpose. Unfortunately.
|
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. Well, it'll at least be part of the arguments the sides use. |
|
Don't expect them to actually count them though.
|
bigtree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
9. did you ask this about the polls showing an Obama lead |
|
I would like to think so . . .
|
NJSecularist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. Yes, I have said the same thing about all of the national polls |
|
even the ones that have shown Obama in the lead.
They mean shit right now.
|
CyberPieHole
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message |
TeamJordan23
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Newsweek National Poll: Obama 42%, Clinton 41% |
ElsewheresDaughter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message |
15. NYT's Clinton 912....Obama 741 delegates |
milkyway
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-09-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message |
16. They took a national poll on Tuesday with a sample size of about 14 million. |
|
Pretty much an even split. There are no more "national" primaries left. What Cali and NY voters think doesn't matter much in LA, NB, or WA. But if makes you feel good keep believing it.
btw, your Rasmussen site also says there is now a 38.8% chance of Hillary winning the nomination. How da ya like them apples?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 08:03 PM
Response to Original message |