jackson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:33 PM
Original message |
How is Hillary status quo and Obama change? Let's make a change checklist |
|
I'll start.
Health care: Obama=change. Hillary=bigger change War: Obama=change. Hillary=change Supreme Court: Obama=change. Hillary=change Rethug Trickle-down: Obama=change. Hillary=change
Corporate influence: Obama=no change. Hillary=no change Trade: Obama=tiny change (NAFTA). Hillary=small change (review all trade agreements, not just NAFTA) but more than Obama
|
waiting for hope
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message |
Armstead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message |
|
History of meaningless partisan polarization (NOT meaningful dichotomy of issues):
Obama -- Big Change Hillary -- Step backward
Involvement of DLC and dominance of it in Democratic Party
Obama -- Change Hillary -- Restoration of ultimate influence
Need for fresh face (apart from policies)
Obama -- Big Change Hillary -- Restoration of same old, same old
|
MagsDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. How is Obama going to affect change regarding |
|
"meaningless partisan polarization" when he and his supporters regurgitate rethug talking points endlessly? Hell, he's running a new version of the Harry and Louise ads against universal healthcare. Doesn't sound like the rhetoric matches the actions to me.
And what election has the DLC ever influenced? Ever? That's just bullshit.
Fresh face? Bush was a "fresh face" How did that work out for us?
|
Armstead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
13. Clinton was a "fresh face" in 92 |
|
The Clintons are the focal point for partisan polarization based solely on personality and "teams." Some of it deserved, some of it undeserved. But that's the reality.
The DLC is the power behind the throne for Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton and a whole brand of Democrat. They influence the whole system within the party.
|
Scriptor Ignotus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
25. Bush was a "fresh face"??? |
|
I could have sworn he was the son of a former President.
I'll post a link later if I can find one...
|
jackson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
26. He was unknown to most of the country until 2000 |
|
He is different from Hillary in that respect. His point is a good one. Replace Bush with Reagan if you want to quibble with the example used.
|
jackson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. So you can't back up the Obamite change meme with any substance? |
|
Obama will be polarizing just like every president since Adams if elected. No change with either.
Obama is as DLC as Hillary. If he isn't name one policy disagreement he has with the DLC. Again, no change with either.
Fresh face? That's what it all comes down to. His name isn't Clinton. That is why he does best with the rich. They can afford "change" like that but working folks need real change.
Even if Hillary is the restoration of the 90's that isn't a bad thing. Is Obama going to create over twenty million jobs?
|
Armstead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
In general, I think I agree with a lot of what you stand for.
And I am not jumping up and down with enthusiasm for Obama.
But to me the Clintons are the opposite of liberal/progressive populism and they are antagonists of it. One of their basic missions has been to send real progressive reform to the back of the bus.
Sure, Hillary talks a populist line now, because she has to tailor her message to the widespread discontent of the public. But she'll just chalk that off to the exigencies of campaigning if she gets into the White Hoiuse, and the corporations will breathe easier knowing that they'll be taken care of.
|
usrbs
(583 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
15. "Need for a new face" more important than how good they'll govern? n/t |
jackson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 01:11 PM by jackson_dem
:shrug:
|
kirby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Obama = No. Hillary - Didn't show up for the vote.
|
jackson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Hillary: yes Obama: didn't show up
|
Zodiak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
Obama voted "Nay"
Hillary didn't show up
The rest of the DLC gave Bush what he wanted.
|
backscatter712
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
19. Wish I could rec this post! |
|
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 01:15 PM by backscatter712
This FISA vote was right in the middle of a big election fight. Hillary had no excuse for failing to make a showing here - she knew damned well her vote (or lack thereof) would be watched and noted.
Obama came and did his job. Hillary thought winning elections was more important than civil liberties.
|
jackson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
21. Hillary has a good attendance record. Obama doesn't |
|
He has not voted on many important bills.
|
MethuenProgressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Obama = Ted Kennedy, the Grateful Dead, 55 yo Oprah, 65 yo Joan Baez... that's "new"? |
|
"She's the Past! I'm the Future!" -BO Um... Not.
|
mkultra
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
bill was fine, but it can be better.
|
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
22. Clintons - Poppy Bush, Stephens, Marc Rich, Dubai and Saudi royals...THAT's NEW? |
|
You want the continuing protection of BushInc but don't have the guts to say so straight up.
|
cooolandrew
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message |
8. A review tends to be a brush off in politics speak. |
cooolandrew
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
Edited on Tue Feb-12-08 12:55 PM by cooolandrew
|
Freida5
(649 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:53 PM
Response to Original message |
11. But you need to deduct 50% off of Obama's score to compensate for his learning curve |
cooolandrew
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. Running a competitive campaign check, balanced campaign budget check, media friendly check learns... |
Occam Bandage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Okay, let's make a checklist: |
|
Change: Obama=yes. Hillary=no.
Whee!
|
jsamuel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 01:05 PM
Response to Original message |
16. thanks, Edwards was Big Change all the way down |
Vinca
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message |
20. Obama = not a Bush or Clinton. Hillary = another Bush or Clinton. |
jackson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
|
So FDR was not change because he was related to TR?
|
Neo-wobbly
(124 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-12-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message |
27. Funny, my list looks a little different |
|
Health care: Obama=little change. Hillary=little change War: Obama= no change. Hillary=no change Supreme Court: Obama=change? what's that? Hillary=no change Rethug Trickle-down: Obama=no change. Hillary=no change
Corporate influence: Obama=he'll say "change" a lot. Hillary=two bits Education: Obama=no change. Hillary=no change Civil Liberties (Patriot, FISA, etc): Obama=no change. Hillary=change your shorts
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 13th 2024, 12:25 AM
Response to Original message |