|
First, the scenario described, where EVEN WITH Florida and MI counted, Hillary Clinton ends up with more pledged delegates and/or raw votes than Obama (even though without them, Obama is in the lead) is a narrow band of possibility that at this point -- barring some kind of massive media feeding frenzy directed suddenly at Obama, something I am NOT predicting -- seems to put forward a picture of Obama faring much less well than appears likely at this point.
Let's for the moment completely discount Obama's ENORMOUS momentum, and imagine that the votes and caucuses in various jurisdictions more or less go as currently expected. Wisconsin is close, Hillary wins solid victories in both Ohio and Pa, and a less solid (I don't know of any polls in TX more recent than 1/31, before Tsunami Tuesday) victory in TX. Obama, as expected, wins out S Dakota, Mississippi, North Carolina (fairly large margin, as in S Car, Georgia and Alabama), Wyoming, Montana, Hawaii and Vermont. The remaining states (RI, Oregon, Kentucky, Indiana) and Puerto Rico are harder to predict, although the most recent poll I've seen for Rhode Island shows HRC in the lead. But let's suppose arguendo that ALL these states go at least narrowly for Hillary.
Obama's overall lead in raw votes, as well as pledged delegates, while less than at present, is likely to be maintained. In this scenario (towards the optimistic end of the spectrum for Hillary Clinton), Obama still is in a very strong position, with many Superdelegates likely to rally behind him, to avoid an unclear outcome or 'brokered' convention. In the scenario of the OP, one would have to assume that the SuperDelegates, many of whom are wavering in their support for HRC, would be stupid enough to create a huge crisis within the party in order to INSIST on Hillary Clinton, and for what? Without maintaining her still significant SD lead, there's no WAY she gets the nomination, and little reason to believe the rest of the SDs would break HEAVILY for her, as would be more or less requisite in the OP scenario. If the SD's rally behind Obama, then there is little crisis, and Obama runs as strongly against McCain as HRC and quite possibly more strongly (as a whole battery of national polls now suggest).
In short, the scenario posited seems highly unlikely. But the more COMMANDING a lead Obama ends up with, the more easily he will unify the party, and the less conflict there needs to be over the nomination. It is for this reason that supporting Obama, for those inclined towards him, is necessary at this point, even if he seems destined to win (or to lose) a particular state primary or caucus.
|