Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will Obama be the Democrat's "Teflon President"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 12:53 PM
Original message
Will Obama be the Democrat's "Teflon President"?
The answer is yes.

Why? There are probably many, many reasons. I will offer a few. Maybe others can come up with more.

1. He has consistently offered a positive message of hope and change. So any time someone gets negative on him, it makes them look nasty, negative and like "more of the same nastiness". So it only serves to contrast his more positive message and appearance.

2. He has a wonderful hip, self-deprecating sense of humor. Even to the point of poking fun at his cult phenom status. He acknowledges it and deflects it. "Wow, I gotta admit some of my speeches were pretty darned good." This type of humor makes him look fresh while at the same time deflecting the criticism.

3. Repuke opponents will have to walk on eggshells because they want to appeal to racist sentiments but the potential backfire factor is also big.

Any other thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think Ray-Gun and the Bush Wacker used up all of the available
supply of Teflon. :dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think the concept
of having a "Teflon President" is a horrid one.

Bush is a "Teflon President".

Reagan was a "Teflon President"

"Teflon Presidents" are dangerous to this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I disagree.
"Reagan was a Scorpio. Reagan was dangerous. Obama is a Scorpio. Obama must be dangerous."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Not the same
A President who can't be criticized?

Not American.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Never said "can't be criticized". That's a mischaracterization to score a point.
What mechanism prevents him from being criticized? None.

Merely that he is resistant to criticism does nothing to impugn his character.

It is merely an observation that he is a powerful force for persuasion and leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Look at your point #3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Yeah and?
It is a fact. It may even be an unfair fact from some people's vantage point.

The same would be true if it were Hil, by the way. People would want to attack her for being a woman but would face a similar risk of backlash for appearing sexist.

The biggest truth is that if Hillary were more immune to criticism, though, you would be the first one to applaud it. I think you are being contrary because you do not really like Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Not at all.
First --it's not true --sexism is far more acceptable in this nation than racism, so that's not necessarily true.

Your point was that people would be afraid to criticize Obama, lest they be labeled as racist.

Secondly -- I would not applaud this if it were true about Hillary. The fact is, that if this were true about Hillary I'd be less likely to support her.

Thirdly --You are correct on one thing only. I really do not like Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. And your dislike of Obama colors every thing you say, rendering it questionable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. as does your hatred of Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. There's a difference between
"immune to criticism" and "immune to character assassination."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Bill Clinton was Teflon--left office with fairly high approval ratings. When people
like you, you have a hell of a lot of leeway. People like Obama in much the same way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Bill was not Teflon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
31. He was. The only way the scandals and mud hurt you is if the people
who elected you care. And by and large, his constituents did not let that stuff influence their opinion of him as a President--again, he left office with a fairly high approval rating, and is still fondly remembered. That's the definition of Teflon--not smears, legal charges, or ethics charges sticking, but whether or not the public believes the stuff, or cares.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. I disagree
The fact is Bill Clinton had one of the most honest administrations in recent history --and yet he is still thought of as a liar.

That's not "Teflon"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. He's thought of as a liar because he lied. BUT--his dishonesty
didn't destroy him in terms of public opinion. People can acknowledge that he lied, that he fucked up, and still like him and think of him as a good or competent President, overall--most folks aren't looking for perfection in their leaders. And the Whitewater stuff never did stick to him--most Americans didn't care. Again, MY definition of Teflon is not that your enemies can prove you fucked up, and make charges and accusations stick--it's whether or not those mistakes and charges DAMAGE you forever in the eyes of the people. Clinton is not regarded as a national disgrace, the way Nixon was, the way Chimpy will be. Sorry, he's Teflon--he has built up enough goodwill among the American people that they still think favorably of him, despite the turmoil and mistakes. We'll just have to agree to disagree here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Right.
Sure.

I've read some of the most repulsive lies about Bill Clinton on this progressive forum.

They sure seem to stick to that "Teflon"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Bill was not teflon. He was a cast-iron skittle. When hot, he cooked beautifully.
But that shit stuck like crazy on him.
http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2004/08/19/frypan,0.jpg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jakem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. lol. nice one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SayitAintSo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. I agree whole heartedly
Being the teflon candidate has not been a positive either... early vetting has it's place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. Bill Clinton Was The Original Teflon President nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. Uhm no
That was Reagan.

Judging from this board alone --even amongst Democrats --Bill was and is hardly "Teflon"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. He framed his candidacy as one of Hope, very early.
So, it appears, if you criticize Obama, you criticize Hope.

He and Axelrod are intelligent professionals who keep doing everything right. They've made an art at counter-attacking without so much as a swing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
40. That's a Kucinich campaign line wasn't it?
Kucinich hope and work toward the light...no fear, etc.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. Is this your covert way of starting the Nader push on DU? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Huh? Are you taking heavy medication or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. If he's teflon - then I hope he's bold
If he is teflon, I surely hope he uses it to get liberal ideals into practice. Anything that helps the working and middle class become strong would be great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. Good points and I hope he can use this to get his agenda through
Congress. I think it's one of his main advantages over Clinton, his ability to
deflect negativity and use his speaking skills to get people to take action that
can get us out of the messes we're in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. It's not what's in the Teflon, it's what goes ON the Teflon
Chimpy and Unca Ronnie needed their Teflon to deflect the shitstorms from all their criminal activity. Obama will just need to fend off bullshit right wing attacks. You need a lot less teflon for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sloppyjoe25s Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
15. He takes on every attack head on - to easily defuse them...
Each and every time he is attacked with a new line - he starts quoting the attack
in his stump speeches - and he quotes the attack in responses at debates.

It seems counter-intuitive - like it might re-enforce the attack - but Obama does it skillfully to
sort of hold the attack up in his hand - rotate it around for all to see at multiple angles -
and then to thoroughly and artfully debunk the attack.

It is an excellent technique - epitomized by his line in Tuesday's debate that
"Hillary has been using the line 'Get Reaal'" quite a bit this week -
"The thinking is that everyone who is supporting me (including all the major papers in Texas) are somehow delusional"

It is this sort of skill in dealing with attacks, and shrinking them to nothing, that bodes very well for
his ability to win the general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
16. What happens when Teflon is heated too much?
The nonstick coating used in DuPont’s Teflon pans has been found to release one or more of 15 different toxic gases when heated to certain temperatures. Which chemicals are released depends on the temperature of the pan. This outgassing is fatal to pet birds and can cause “polymer fume flu”, also known as “Teflon flu”, in humans.

Teflon flu creates flu-like symptoms of chills, headache, fever and nausea. Usually, symptoms subside within a few days, and chances are many people who have experienced it mistook it for the flu. However, there are also more serious risks.

One of the main chemicals used in the manufacturing process of Teflon and other nonstick pans is perflurooctanoic acid (PFOA) also known as C-8. This chemical has led to cancer and birth defects in lab animals, and may have led to birth defects in DuPont plant workers. In 2005, an independent panel reporting to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) declared PFOA a likely human carcinogen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
R_M Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. Teflon on anyone is a bad thing.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jakem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
35. a bit to literal there LF-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #35
42. If Democrats had heated Reagan or Bush more they would had burned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
20. I disagree - today in my paper, on all the Sunday talk shows - what were they talking about?
Michelle's comments added to the list that the rw has already compiled which
questions Obama's patriotism.

Don't flame ME - this is what they are talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Thatr attack, like others, will not pan out and may even backfire.
Too McCarthy -like to be used very far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. As a Democrat that wants to win in November -
I hope and pray that you are right.

Guess I still have a hangover from 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
30. He will have so many voters with him ready to defend his presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. Regardless of what he does?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
33. I sure hope not....No 'president' should get a free ride on policy regardless of party
It is our duty as Americans to make sure they don't. I don't want a 'teflon president'
because that connotates he could continue the policy of unitary executive, signing statements, recess hijinx, enforcement of all the bills already passed to take away civil liberties that he has not stated he would work to repeal, getting us into another war, etc. and it would be approved by democrats simply because he is one. Howis that 'change?' and why would anyone worth their salt want that? Haven't we learned anything in the last eight years? I can't believe anyone would even suggest that regardless of who they support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
36. Governing is very different than campaigning
Edited on Sun Feb-24-08 01:41 PM by ruggerson
if he's elected, "hope" isn't going to cut it. Results will. I will be rooting for him to succeed, but he doesn't have the faux friendly grandfather thing that the evil one had. He has hip and cool, but hip and cool is a two edged sword.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Amen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC