totodeinhere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 07:15 PM
Original message |
Clinton invoked Reagan on O'Reilly. |
|
Didn't she criticize Obama for doing the same thing?
|
anonymous171
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message |
1. HRC supporters should be screaming bloody murder about this. |
|
Just like they did with Obama.
|
islandmkl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message |
2. that was BEFORE she saw that it didn't hurt him one little bit... |
|
just fuckin' desperate...
|
mcctatas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 07:19 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Now she's even stealing his (supposed) fuck-up's? |
|
what next, she reveals a long 20 year relationship with a wacky pastor? No shame, no shame at all...
btw, thank you for the info, I can't bring myself to watch billo no matter who the guest is....
|
totodeinhere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. I turned it off the minute the interview was over. |
|
But it's interesting to see that symbiotic relationship between Clinton and that asshole. I wonder if he's shilling for Clinton because he thinks she would be a weaker candidate in the general election than Obama.
|
4themind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
HiFructosePronSyrup
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 07:32 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Now she'll accuse him of retroactive plagiarism. |
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 07:33 PM
Original message |
She's the queen. She can do and say anything. |
|
Intergrity has nothing to do with anything anymore.
The corporate powers don't believe in Democracy......just Bushes and Clintons.
|
cliffordu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 08:51 PM
Response to Original message |
18. You got the queen part right, FrenchieCat.... |
boston bean
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Oh FFS, she was talking about Tip O'Neill really, and SS Reagan was president then. nt |
totodeinhere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. No, she mentioned Reagan's name first. |
boston bean
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
totodeinhere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. What's that supposed to mean? |
|
In his interview that he gave in Reno Obama mentioned both Reagan, a Repuke, and Kennedy, a Democrat. Yet Clinton and her supporters excoriated Obama for mentioning Reagan. It didn't matter that he also mentioned Kennedy. So now please tell me why should Clinton get a pass just because she also mentioned Tip when the Clinton camp didn't give Obama a pass? This is rampant hypocrisy at it's worst and it should not be allowed to stand.
|
Jed Dilligan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. Don't wait around for an answer. |
book_worm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message |
9. I'm so happy that O'Liely and Hill finally got together since they are |
emilyg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
totodeinhere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. It's good that you enjoyed her little love fest with O'Reilly. |
emilyg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
totodeinhere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. Isn't that some kind of perfume? |
emilyg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
apocalypsehow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-30-08 09:05 PM
Response to Original message |
19. But, but, but...that's *DIFFERENT* don't yah know? It's uh, because, um...why are you a sexist? |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 12th 2024, 04:33 AM
Response to Original message |