Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jake Tapper: "clip -- not sent to me by anyone affiliated with the Obama campaign"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 01:21 PM
Original message
Jake Tapper: "clip -- not sent to me by anyone affiliated with the Obama campaign"
In a post explaining why his earlier one had been taken down, Tapper points out it was not the Obama campaign who sent him the latest Kantor clip:

(He also denied the legitimacy of another clip, which certainly seems doctored, in which he uses a horrible racial slur. I'd seen that clip -- not sent to me by anyone affiliated with the Obama campaign, I hasten to add -- but I had not posted it.)


http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/05/the-mystery-of.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. My money is on the Hillary campaign or the GOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It wouldn't make sense for the Clinton campaign to do this.
It's a slam against one of their campaign advisors in 1992.

The GOP has many more reasons to stir sh*t for the Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. actually it does take the story away from.....
WVWV and Sidney Blumenthal. Bury true stories under a seemingly true story that turns out to be false. It has happened before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. what is WVWV? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Woman's Voices Woman Vote
http://www.wvwv.org/

They have been caught making a "mistake" on how they are running a robo-call telephone campaign. Problem is the "mistake" is similar to the "mistakes" they where caught at in other states.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/news/2008/05/nc_attorney_general_says_wvwv.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Get a grip. This doctored video was meant to HURT Hillary in INDiana!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #20
32. A doctored video HELPS Clinton.

1. She plays the victim (with the aid of Stephanolpoulas in her ABC paid for townhall).
2. Ties Obama to the LIBERAL blogs.
3. She'll use it to claim that all stories about her are false even the TRUE NC Robo-call.

for starters (though there are also plenty of other ways in which it helps her).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. So who DID send it to him?
Or is he saying he just picked it up from youtube? It's unclear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
27. Try Karl Rove
He hurts both dems and laughs the whole way at how he leads people around like lemmings. Why on earth would Hillary put this out - it hurts her campaign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. So why didn't he bother to verify it
before reporting this on his blog? Is the role of a "journalist" just to mindlessly publicize every campaign hoax?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Good question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Have you paid attention to the Whore media this decade?
Tapper probably got it from Drudge or someone like that.

Not that this is a hoax. I think some people really need to clean out some earwax.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. It is a hoax
Edited on Fri May-02-08 01:40 PM by Marie26
It's a doctored video; that's been confirmed. The role of a journalist *used* to be to investigate, confirm, find out the truth of things. Now we might as well just replace the NY Times w/the Drudge Report, since there's no difference anyway. I'm disappointed in Tapper, he used to be a good reporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
37. I've been increasingly unhappy with Jake Tapper since he went to the big time at ABC.
He's a little too full of himself and he smirks all the time. I liked him better before. I think he was at Slate. He seemed to be aliberal then. NOw he's just a main stream a-hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. It's also possible he got it
from someone here - there were calls this morning to distribute the doctored video far and wide in the media. Why he didn't confirm is a very good question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. If you read his blog, the answer is clear. Go ahead, read it. It won't hurt you.
People were reporting on Kantor calling the people of Indiana shit since the movie came out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. But that's not what Tapper first reported
He reported the fake, doctored "white n*gger" video on his blog & gave it much more exposure. There's a big difference between a news organization & a random Youtube user. Tapper basically used the name & reputation of ABC News to give creditibility to a libelous hoax, And he might have even exposed ABC News to a libel suit. The least he could've done is check out the video first, but IMO he was blinded by a desire for a scoop & perhaps a desire to hurt Clinton's chances in Indiana.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. No he didn't. I read his blog this morning and the comments were asking why he didn't report it.
If you want to take others to task for the facts, you might get yours straight first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
43. Because he, like other Obama supporters will hurl ANYTHING at ANYONE
in order to prop up their flagging candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. And this, from the same blog entry
"It's all a mess, though I must say when "The War Room" came out other folks interpreted Kantor to be impugning Indiana residents.

In The Washington Post's review of the film in 1993, critic Desson Howe referred to "a Mickey Kantor comment about the people of Indiana (when it looks as though Clinton's ahead in Dan Quayle's state)."

And a 1995 story in the Sydney Morning Herald said that "As for the good folk of Indiana, they are still recovering from the 1993 documentary War Room, which revealed the grim truth behind the Clinton election campaign. It showed Mr Kantor bursting in on election night to tell other campaign staffers that incredibly, Mr Clinton was doing well even in Republican Indiana. 'And those people are s---!' he declared breathlessly."

Were I not currently eating a chicken sandwich at Liberty East Restaurant in Charlotte, NC, while working on a World News piece about the economy and the candidates, I would go to Blockbuster, rent a copy of The War Room and settle this matter as much as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
29. The quote doesn't even make sense
that way. Do you think it makes sense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #29
39. The WaPo and The Herald did, apparently. Course I didn't think it made sense of Hill to bash
the good people of Louisiana or Southern whites, but apparently she thought it made sense.

I do know that the Clintons were very bad for the Democratic Party. When they lost both houses of congress in 1994 what has been referred to as the "Republican Revolution" wasn't. The Repos that year voted in the same number as the Repos did in 1990, the last mid-term.

The big difference was that due to NAFTA and Hillary's secretive and elitist health care reform boondoggle, Democrats stayed home in droves compared to turn out in 1990.

Why they killed their own party never made sense, but that's what they did.

Does the gas tax holiday proposal make sense to you, except as a pandering desperate move to try and buy some votes? It doesn't to me. We are pumping too much CO2 into the environment as it is, importing too much oil as it is, without passing policies to exacerbate the problem.

Doesn't make any sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. You'll apparently believe whatever
you want. Your choice. I couldn't care less. Pump up this story - it only makes Sen Obama supporters look bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. You don't believe Krugman? Go ahead and google the turn-out in '90 an '94.
Then ask yourself.

Does it make sense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. So you think it makes sense
that he would insult people that look to be doing exactly what he wants them to do?

I know exactly what happened in 1994 and blame Bill Clinton for a lot of it but I don't see either him or his wife as the personification of evil like some people here do. I'll vote for whoever has the D behind their name in November. Unfortunately, our best and brightest are consigned to the sidelines for this election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #42
53. Well, the occupation is evil and so was the invasion. In some ways Sen, Clinton
personified herself with that.

I'm pretty fed up with the status quo.

Kucinich was my candidate, and then when he left to defend his congressional seat I was leaning Edwards and when he left a week later I had to make a choice.

The more I know about Barack, though, the more I like him.

I like that he was a community organizer. I like that when he finished law school and his stint as the editor of the Harvard Law Review instead of taking a lucrative position at a high powered corporate law firm he instead decided to teach constitutional law.

And I like that his campaign is the most grassroots I've ever seen in 35 years of doing volunteer campaign work.

And I'm really not into top down dynasties.

Whether an insult was expressed among friends in semi private toward the voters of Indiana or not, I can't say with certainty, The newspapers reported it as if they thought it was, but it's really neither here nor there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #53
54. Of course I agree with you on
the "war" and occupation. But I think people forget just who Sen Clinton represents - the very New Yorkers who saw 9/11 up close and personal. I do find that my friends outside of the state really don't look at it the same way we do. I know people are cynical about that IWR vote and I don't blame them to a certain extent - I do believe part of that vote was based on her not wanting to look weak on terror but many New Yorkers did not have a problem with it and she does represent us.

Now, Kyle/Lieberman - THAT is a vote I vehemently disagreed with because I saw what this administration is capable of and no longer has the slightest trust for them. That's the vote I have trouble swallowing. I'd be more apt to be a stronger supporter of Sen Obama if he hadn't wimped out and not voted. My choices are obviously out of the race as well (Richardson, Biden, Dodd) but I can honestly say - with no reservations - that either Sen Clinton or Sen Obama is head an shoulders above Sen McCain. So it's a bit different for me - I have no emotional attachment to either one and the vehemence in the hostility I see here for both candidates is a bit startling and only hurts us in the long run. But I do have faith that once a candidate is chosen, most of us will come together to beat McCain. But I have also been called pathologically optimistic.

I think the press focuses on these issues that don't really matter because it's easy for them - it requires no complex thinking and releases them from having to focus on the issues. I have totally given up on the cable news shows and simply don't add to the ratings. If everyone just shut off their damn tv's and made it known they wouldn't engage until real issues were talked about, it would be different. When sites like DU call for an email campaign against slanted news, the networks don't give a shit - at least they know you're (in the larger sense) watching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. Dirty tricks from the party of dirty tricks IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. And Besides Everything He Said In His Latest Blog About SOP's......
what he didn't say is that the video also damn's a colleague of his - Georgie S. and ABC just can't have that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. Who asked Jake?
When someone offers me answers to questions I didn't ask it makes me wonder.

Son
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. He could have had 500 emails from Clinton supporters
Who knows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. He didn't say anything about any emails so what makes you think that?
Just guessing?

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. A lot of people posted in the comments section
accusing the Obama campaign of starting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #22
35. Yes, just guessing nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
30. Why would Clinton supporters want this
out. I swear, has everybody stopped thinking today? It was the Sen Obama supporters that called for worldwide distribution of this doctored video this morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. That's not what I meant
I meant that perhaps (as in "who knows?) Clinton supporters were emailing Jake Tapper to find out if he had received it from the Obama campaign. It's not as if there haven't been numerous posts today here on DU where Clinton supporters were saying just that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Probably angry Obama supporters who thought he was burying the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. Uh, there isn't anyone with half a brain who isn't disavowing the fucking thing.
Yet, still, here on DU, we have little soldiers who haven't gotten the word to "stand down" from the general.

PSST--Someone amongst your number has done a bad thing, and they have been CAUGHT. Give it a rest.

I do hope Mickey Kantor sues the pants off the little "shit" who posted that GREAT Big Lie. That way we might find out who put him up to it. Let's hope the string doesn't lead anywhere close to the throne, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Here: some info
"It's all a mess, though I must say when "The War Room" came out other folks interpreted Kantor to be impugning Indiana residents.

In The Washington Post's review of the film in 1993, critic Desson Howe referred to "a Mickey Kantor comment about the people of Indiana (when it looks as though Clinton's ahead in Dan Quayle's state)."

And a 1995 story in the Sydney Morning Herald said that "As for the good folk of Indiana, they are still recovering from the 1993 documentary War Room, which revealed the grim truth behind the Clinton election campaign. It showed Mr Kantor bursting in on election night to tell other campaign staffers that incredibly, Mr Clinton was doing well even in Republican Indiana. 'And those people are s---!' he declared breathlessly."

Were I not currently eating a chicken sandwich at Liberty East Restaurant in Charlotte, NC, while working on a World News piece about the economy and the candidates, I would go to Blockbuster, rent a copy of The War Room and settle this matter as much as possible.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/05/the-mystery-of.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
46. I can't find that SMH review anywhere, and I have looked.
Found one in 94, but no 1995. Isn't that curious? Maybe it's me, and I'm missing it, but I can't get it to come up.

I found the Howe review, and all I can say is, his ears don't match mine or MSNBC's. You can watch the film on YOUTUBE, too. It doesn't sound like what he is saying it says, and that doesn't make any sense in context, either.

Why would Kantor be saying "Fuck the good people of Indiana" when Clinton was doing so WELL there? He was saying the Indiana GOP POLLSTERS were shitTING because their estimates were totally off the mark. It's obvious, if you get back to reality, what the context is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. So, an Obama operative sent a doctored clip back in time for the reviewers to comment on.
The "n-word" mention was scurrilous.

The "s-word" part wasn't just us hearing things. Those reviewers heard the same things fifteen years ago. Care to explain that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #24
44. I found the Howe review, but not the SMH one--NOTHING in 95.
My ears hear what MSNBC's do--not shit, shitting. He wasn't talking about the "people" he was talking about the idiots who predicted the polls. It's apparent from the context, unless you totally want to suspend reality.

It doesn't make any sense for Kantor to be yelling at the VOTERS--the WAR ROOM was all about the contest between CAMPAIGNS. He was slapping down the shitty predictors on the GOP team.

Go listen to it on YOUTUBE--the actual movie, not that dubbed piece of shit that has been taken down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
33. So much for the politics of hope and change.
The Obamites would rather engage in smear politics than listen to their messiah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TragedyandHope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
21. Rove sent it out
Edited on Fri May-02-08 02:07 PM by TragedyandHope
Two birds with one stone.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. Of course it was Rove
It's like people have stopped thinking today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
45. No, this wasn't Rove. This was an Obama supporter. The only question is, did he do it on his own?
Or did he have help with that SUAVE audio dubbing, and was he instructed in any form by the 'war room?'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NotThisTime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. Maybe it's a rogue from Woman's Voices Woman Vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Naaah, that was just sloppy and amateurish. Not a pro job like that
cleverly dubbed audio, with subtitles. That took a little work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
34. Thank you, Wesdem!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
36. Operation Chaos - Hello...
I smell a big fat rat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #36
47. No. Not Operation Chaos. Operation Some Big Fucking Idiot. Who may, or may NOT,
be taking orders from higher up.

In any event, all it does is make HOPE CHANGE BELIEVE look like LIE CHEAT STEAL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. Nice try but I'm not buying.
Show a link - a trail - or some evidence of some sort or you're just pissing up a rope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. Here--take your own advice, here's the rope. From Obama supporters at KOS
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/5/2/134311/6435/674/507820

And tune in to CNN--they covered the story as the HOAX it was, and entitled it DIRTY TRICKS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
50. of course the Obama campaign wouldn't stoop to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC