NNN0LHI
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 09:22 AM
Original message |
If some freeper makes a phony video of Obama using racial slurs will DU allow them to link to it? |
|
Because that is the precedent that appears to have been set here now. If something is on YouTube its fair game to many people.
Even if that something is known to be false they can still keep posting it here forever.
Does anyone think that is good for us? I think we need to start using a little common sense.
This reminds me of an old Gene Hackman movie called The Conversation. Anyone remember it?
Don
|
zabet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 09:25 AM
Response to Original message |
|
It would be deleted as quickly as possible and the poster banned.
It is OK to spread lies concerning Hillary, in fact, it seems to be the MO for many posters here.
|
John Q. Citizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message |
2. You may not be aware but U-tube took down the clip in question yesterday. |
|
There are however clips from the documentary "The War Room" up at u-tube.
If that bothers you, well, what can you do?
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. that was not the point of the OP now was it. |
John Q. Citizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. I know, the OP wanted to whine and complain because someone put up a clip |
|
that wasn't a perfect copy of the original at u-tube. It increased the volume and put in text that was intended to lead people to believe that an inaudible statement in the original said something that no-one can tell if it did or not.
The OP is attempting to hold DU management respionsible for that, an idea which i find to be quite ridiculous.
It is equivalent to holding DU responsible for someone linking to the NYT coverage leading up to the invasion of Iraq.
Sorry, but it's not DUs problem. Do you have a problem? I guess you do. Everybody has problems.
|
dogday
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
20. I don't see it that way... I see a valid question.. DU rules |
|
provide that reference that is not true or not from a reputable source should be deleted or locked... That is SOP for DU, so I believe this is a valid question from a DU member...
|
Exilednight
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
40. I see it as the OP complaining. When the video in question went up, no one could validate........ |
|
its authenticity. Once it was figured that the video in question was a fake, you tube took it down and every link on this board to that video no longer worked.
|
dogday
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
43. Then another youtube video appeared with many more threads |
|
I just call them as I see them... BTW-- Neither candidate is my choice so I am not being biased about this...
|
John Q. Citizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #43 |
49. People post links to u-tube videos all the time. I think it's great. |
|
Are you suggesting that the other u-tube video wasn't original?
You do realize there is a documentary called "The War Room", and that at least two newspapers (The WaPo and the Australian Morning Herald) wrote in 1993 and 1995 respectively about the "those people are sh_t" comment contained in the move and interpreted it as a slight to Indiana voters.
Was it a slight? Heck I don't know. But it's not exactly unheard of apparently.
I don't know anything about the second link to u-tube that you mentioned. Why is it a problem to link to a clip from a documentary?
By the way, who is your candidate?
|
dogday
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #49 |
53. No candidate here, I am saying that the words |
|
Edited on Sat May-03-08 08:22 PM by dogday
being repeated on this board about this tape were very much incorrect, not that the second tape was wrong... There was nothing sinister to this tape, nothing sinister at all....
I will support and vote for whomever the Dem Nominee will be in November, that is all I can promise...
|
Lannigan
(141 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
52. Yes, but the vile conversation |
|
Edited on Sat May-03-08 06:46 PM by Lannigan
and the dancing on a candidate's perceived grave continued.
edited for typo
|
JoFerret
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-04-08 06:07 AM
Response to Reply #52 |
56. Yep. And those threads and posts are a mere few clicks away |
|
The gleeful shrieking is there to be seen in all its glory.
|
SwampG8r
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
the people who do that? those people are shit :sarcasm:
|
Joe the Revelator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. Sadly, another point has flown over your head... |
mtnsnake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
13. How do figure that? Rodeo was spot on. |
zabet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
Oh momma mia! Momma mia! Miss mia!!!!!!!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
|
mtnsnake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
22. hahahaha!! Mama Mia Miss Mia! |
zabet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
|
wolshie don't wanna play. :rofl:
|
golddigger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
35. On noes, it's momma MIA!!! |
qnr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
36. Mama Mia! Do you even read posts before posting? n/t |
okasha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
sueragingroz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
45. Aren't we all on some levels. |
democracy1st
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-04-08 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
55. Give it a break,we've been trying to get the Clintons to denounce the rightwing tactics |
|
and you guys didn't blink a eye,and when the Clintons used those same tactics you all applauded
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message |
3. The tread would VAPORIZE~~~ |
Yossariant
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 09:30 AM
Response to Original message |
5. The YouTube video about Obama and crack was deleted repeatedly until |
|
that whitehouse.com site started talking about the polygraph.
Only then were a couple of threads allowed.
The callous, Concerted, win-at-any-cost effort ON THIS BOARD to transmit the lies about Cantor to the MSM says a lot about Obama's internal polling (abysmal) and the lengths his followers are willing to go to satisfy his ambition.
Then they post threads about how they don't want to win the general by "taking the low road."
Appears they don't want to do it to a Republican --- only to a fellow Democrat.
Creepy. Very creepy.
|
hokies4ever
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
10. Lessons learned straight from Hillary |
|
Her mom should be so proud of what her daughter will say and do for power.
|
Catchawave
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 09:51 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Faked anything provided as proof should be banned |
|
Many of those threads were debunked, one of them stayed on the home page all day, despite all the correction threads that followed :shrug:
Takes all the fun out of politics when we stoop to the Drudge level here :cry:
|
Poll_Blind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message |
9. YES THEY GODDAMN WILL. It's in our video section RIGHT NOW. (link) |
Orsino
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
NNN0LHI
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
14. Did you alert on that racist piece of crap like I just did? |
|
If you didn't please do.
Don
|
MNDemNY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
18. Oh, c'mon, that is sooo obviously satire. |
NNN0LHI
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
21. How come I don't see the humor in it? |
|
I usually laugh at satire.
Thats not satire its a hit job.
Don
|
MNDemNY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
27. Take off the Obama blinders. |
NNN0LHI
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #27 |
|
I feel like I am losing my mind here.
I am getting nailed from both sides.
Don
|
Adelante
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
32. It is not a hit job, it's political satire |
|
And it is funny. I don't see why it should be deleted.
|
Poll_Blind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
24. I did...and it was when it was first posted, just before I posted my response. n/t |
MNDemNY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
|
:crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :nopity: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
|
Celebration
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
15. LOL, that one is funny |
|
Thanks. That may be the funniest political video of the season.
|
MNDemNY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
17. That's called "satire". |
Poll_Blind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
25. No laugh track, no attribution, presented as fact. n/t |
MNDemNY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #25 |
28. If you think this is serious, then you must be an Obamatron. |
|
Fer chrissake.:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
|
Adelante
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #25 |
|
Would anybody in their right mind think that is Barack Obama? What fact?
|
Catherina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
Poll_Blind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
31. You can't even spell the N-Word here, but it's ok to have it coming out of his mouth while he.... |
|
...talks about legalizing reefer and plays dominoes.
PB
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
42. You missed the headlines---IT was a FAKE. |
Bjornsdotter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message |
|
...it would mysteriously disappear into the night, not just locked but it would be a missing thread.
cheers
|
mtnsnake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:10 AM
Response to Original message |
16. Nope. See post #1 which nailed it. |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
Hoof Hearted
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 12:10 PM
Response to Original message |
38. Doubtful. Very, very doubtful. |
paulk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message |
41. "the conversation" is one of my top 5 favorite all time movies |
|
don't believe everything you hear...
or think you hear -
and it's the perfect example for this whole stupid Kantor mess.
|
JohnnyLib2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Wish I felt more sure about the answer today. :(
|
Barack_America
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message |
46. Actually, I was only listening to the original video. |
|
The video that was linked by the director as "undoctored" and yet I STILL heard the slur.
Sorry.
|
NNN0LHI
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #46 |
48. People who I know by name say there is no slur so I will believe them over an anonymous web poster |
futureliveshere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 05:10 PM
Response to Original message |
47. I posted it.. Didn't know it was false.. Was just outraged and posted it w/o thinking. |
|
That makes me hasty and a bit stupid. But does not make me a wilful perpertrator of false information.
|
Secret_Society
(466 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message |
50. No! Of course not! THAT would be the old politics and Obama doesn't do that |
jeffrey_X
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message |
51. Was there a fake video of Hillary? |
mistertrickster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-04-08 12:26 AM
Response to Original message |
54. K'd and R'd. I got suckered into this briefly too. Then I listened to the original. |
|
Kantor is clearly talking about "those people (in the White House) are $h!tting" just as the director said.
Why would Kantor call Hoosiers "$h!t" when they were voting his guy into office? It doesn't make sense.
We need to be careful about this kind of hoaxing, especially when it's something that we may want to believe because it helps our guy.
We owe Kantor a big apology. And to the Clinton supporters who claimed it was phony? You were right!
As for the Admins, I sent them an e-mail asking them to lock the video threads. I'm sure I wasn't alone.
But they have are in a tough spot: they don't want to seem guilty of stifling "free speech" . . . or worse to seem guilty of conspiring to hide an unpleasant truth.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 02:10 PM
Response to Original message |