Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Exhausted Kennedy Warns: 'Obama Is Running Out of Time'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:16 PM
Original message
Exhausted Kennedy Warns: 'Obama Is Running Out of Time'

Presidential Politics

Exposed Story

An exhausted Sen. Edward Kennedy admitted to a Boston Herald reporter that Democrat presidential hopeful Sen. Barrack Obama is running out of time to wrap up his party's nomination.

Despite Obama's recent slips, Kennedy says he still believes that Barrack is the best chance for Democrats to take back the White House.

But Kennedy's subdued manner and mechanical recitation of Obama talking points, shows he is clearly worried and very tired!

http://www.exposedstory.com/my_weblog/2008/05/tired-kennedy-w.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. We are all exhausted. He doesn't have a corner on that market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe he got RFK Jr's message?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Which one is that? This?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. Um no. I didn't know he wrote that! WOW
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #22
52. no prodn2000 it's the one where Robert Kennedy said that if
someone hears or sees any type of bigotry or racists remarks one should take a stand and let it be known that it is wrong. Well, obama sat on his ass in church, most likely in that same pew and heard pstor wright spew out all the racial hatred and obama sat there and spoke not a word against the pastor. Obama fails the robert kennedy test for standing up to those that practice racial division and uses bigotted comments. Obama is oozing slowly and will dehydrate after June 3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #52
56. Nail. Hammer. Head.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm right there with him.. Oh well it will be over in June.
Supers will fource her out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Teddy
Is in his 70s...the man can be tired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. I"m exhausted too.......
so Hillary needs to move out of the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. interesting strategy: ask your opponent to quit so you can win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Pretty arrogant
another indication of how clueless Obama would be if elected to the WH.

I used to think he would be a good candidate for the 2012 election, but I'm not sure even that's realistic.

He has a lot of "issues".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
42. I am not sure how many are his
Edited on Sat May-03-08 02:04 PM by JoFerret
versus the clear problems of so many of his followers.

He is a much better candidate than his followers on DU would lead one to believe.
However - you are right. there are some serious issues. But then - he is human.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
45. Methinks you have really slipped up there with your...
"I used to think he would be a good candidate for the 2012 election"

Just what are the implications of that, Clinton supporter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. BALONEY - Kennedy knows as well as Clintons that Obama won this Super Tuesday.
Edited on Sat May-03-08 12:19 PM by blm
This article is meant to DECEIVE voters - the media and Clinton campaign believe their targeted audience really are stupid people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't understand. Why is it OBAMA who is running out of time?
Edited on Sat May-03-08 01:09 PM by enough
I there some sort of rule that HRC wins by default after a certain time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. This article is DECEPTIVE to target the stupid audience who will fall for it.
It's written to deceive as Kennedy has known since Super Tuesday that Obama has won this nomination.

Corporate media and the clinton campaign continuing the lie is because they have no respect for the intellect of their targeted audience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. I did not see him say that on the video. The reporter is probably
biased and made up some crap. If he said anything like that he probably meant his ability to wrap it up (as in end it right now) by winning both states on Tuesday (which would be difficult). That is the only thing I could think he meant IF (and that is a big if because it is not on the video) he said it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. I watched the video and he did not see tired or subdued..lol
He basically said the same thing Obama and his surrogates are saying (that she is a tough opponent and that they believe the country is ready for something new..turn the page...change...whatever you want to call it). LOL And by wrapping it up I think he means if Obama could win both states on Tuesday he could wrap it up. Everyone knows that is unlikely so the process will move forward. It is really pathetic the way people twist what a person says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. Quotation marks are used for direct quotes. This is not one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. You can watch the video on that page too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressive25 Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
31. Admit Obama is in trouble
I am an Obama supporter and I admit he is in trouble. Denial will only assure his loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. How is he in trouble? LOL nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #34
46. He is leading - so if he is "in trouble" who isn't?
HRC has a much harder path to victory - and maybe not even that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #31
47. Uh, huh. And I really favor Hillary, but she sure is running a shady campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Lots of inaccurate messaging going on in the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. Not so sure Chet at Exposed Story has the definitive scoop on how "exhausted"
Kennedy is. Or, did you add that "exhausted" yourself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. Let's see: "spin" from this blogger misrepresenting a Boston Herald
columnist's brief opinion piece is somehow valuable how?

Read the original article... not this spin of a spin of the original.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. That's exactly what I suspected. I may have to put the OP on ignore. Thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Immature to brag about ignore.
Who cares what you do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Heh, heh!!! Like it's a "punishment" to be denied such uninformed comment! nt
Edited on Sat May-03-08 01:14 PM by MADem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. "Who cares what you do?"
Obviously, you do. You took the time to respond.

As for ignore, I like to remind people that we all have that option - rather than getting into an antagonizing fight. Those fights can get pretty immature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I've made it my mission to call people out
on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. Oh, come on--you don't find the IGNORE WHINERS funny? No sense of humor, eh?
    I don't like what you say, so I'm going to put YOU on IGNORE!!!!!


    I can't respond to your points, so I am going to feign offense and put you on IGNORE!!!


    I don't have the intellectual capacity to understand you, so I'm going to put YOU on IGNORE!!!



It's funny to anyone who CAN debate, who can respond, and who does have the intellectual capacity. This IS a moderated forum with rules, which prevents excessive abuse. And there's always that "Hide Thread" option if a discussion gets too painful. But I swear, there have got to be people here--for now, anyway (I suspect they'll be gone after the convention)--who come across threads that are half full of people on IGNORE...and that, to me, is like that lady who debated Randi Rhodes on TV and stuck her fingers in her ears. Not a shining moment!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
21. Watch the video, people
The OP is a reporter's distortion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RememberWellstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
25. Oh my.
How times have changed. Can ye smell it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
28. "Exposed Story?" As Bill Clinton might say, "Give Me A Break!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressive25 Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
29. Obama must hold on to his slim lead
Obama must shift gears and find a way to hold on to his slim lead. Kennedy looks war weary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
30. We have all the time there is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
32. As states vote both candidates run out of time - no surprise there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
35. Some of us remember when Ted decided to run for Pres
He ran against a sitting Democratic President, Jimmy Carter. Ted got trounced in the Primaries yet he went all the long way to the Convention, where he tried to convert Jimmy's delegates to his side. The animosity was obvious. Kennedy's attempt to unseat Carter failed, and the gap was I think 970 delegates. So Ted is one to talk. And he's an expert at running it all down to the wire himself. He did this to a sitting Democratic President. I'd like to hear him speak about that, and how it relates to this year's primary. But he won't. Special rules for Hyannis boys I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #35
44. I remember all that. But I also remember how the media trashed him daily with nonstop headlines
about Chappaquiddick. He never stood a chance in that primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
36. Exposed Story?
Is that some rag that one finds at the check out line in the grocery store?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Not a reputable source, that's for sure.
Probably a Hillary supporter's site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
37. Obama is running out the clock!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressive25 Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. He's nose to nose with Hillary and the race is almost over!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Yeah, and we have a new starting line.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressive25 Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. True
Edited on Sat May-03-08 02:06 PM by progressive25
When Obama is winning, he losing, and when he's losing, Hillary's winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
43. It has been one hell of a fight and there is a lesson to be learned.
Although I have no candidate, I have found out more about the Democratic process than ever, and I have enjoyed watching this fight between two titans... I will support and vote for the one who comes out the winner.. May the best person win....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
48. Well, if the whole thing isn't rigged by the global corporate predators who run
our government--and this deceptive corporate news monopoly practice of interpreting a speaker's statements and NOT putting them in quotes, or NOT including context (used by this blogger), is one example of how things are rigged (the "trade secret" voting machines is another)--it is an "Alice in Wonderland" construction to say that a completely unexpected, "dark horse" candidate like Obama, up against the DLC establishment, is "running out of time" because he's not far enough in the lead and hasn't nailed the nomination yet. Who besides Michelle Obama ever thought he would get this far--with the nomination nearly wrapped up?

This blog is rife with heavily interpretive words.

"An exhausted Sen. Edward Kennedy..."?? (perhaps he hadn't had enough sleep? he's in his 70's!--this detail NOT in the news article).

"...admitted..."?? ('admitted'?? like, he was hiding something before? --this detail is from the news article).

"Kennedy's subdued manner..."?? (maybe he had something else on his mind? --this detail NOT in the news article).

(his) "...mechanical recitation of Obama talking points..."?? (common phenomenon on the campaign trail--usually reporters show a little humanity and ignore it --this detail NOT in the news article).

The blog's interpretive words and outright inventions are in considerable contrast to the news article that the blogger is using as a source. In the Boston Herald news article, there is nothing about Kennedy being "subdued" or "tired." In fact, Kennedy is bouncing right on to the next campaign travels "this weekend." The Boston Herald's opening sentence is interpretive, and the statement that Obama is "running out of time to sew up the Democratic nomination" is NOT in quotes, but the article DOES include considerable context and many positive statements that ARE in quotes. The rest of the article mitigates the opening (not in quotes) negative, and very nearly contradicts it.

The reporter was looking for a story where there wasn't one, and I gather pestered Kennedy until he said something like, "well, yeah, we haven't wrapped it up yet," didn't dare put that in quotes, and led with the one NON-quote, or possibly the editor (who doesn't like Kennedy or Obama?) "found" a title and lede in it and went with an exaggerated, misleading point. Then the blogger ignores nearly all of it, makes shit up, and spins it like a top.

Very, VERY unreliable blogger, and the Boston Herald article itself has a misleading title and lede.

I've taken the trouble to analyze this carefully because I consider Ted Kennedy to be one of the few trustworthy leaders in our political establishment. So his word is important to me. I am very annoyed to have to put out this much effort to figure out what he really said, which was nothing more than the truth of the matter--that Obama hasn't wrapped it up yet, and it could go to the convention. We all know this. And Kennedy is neither exhausted nor discouraged, as the blogger alleges and the article title and lede imply but with no supporting facts or quotes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
49. lol. some lame blogger is your authority in this?
how lame can you folks get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressive25 Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Lame because the blog reports something you don't want to hear?
Edited on Sat May-03-08 07:54 PM by progressive25
LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
51. That's what happens when you become a backstabbing SOB, Teddy!!!!!!
Edited on Sun May-04-08 12:36 AM by Beacool
After the Clintons helped to save your sorry ass from losing your seat to Romney in 1994, after the years of supporting MA and campaigning there for you and the rest of your brood, you went and endorsed the guy you barely you.

Screw you Teddy, I still remember you and your family's antics from Palm Beach and Hyannis. You have some balls to moralize and criticize Bill Clinton like you did when you endorsed Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
53. Bored so soon Teddy? Call up Kerry and go out and have a nice dinner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carrieyazel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
54. Kennedy's exactly right, time is starting to run out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. Obama's about to close the deal.
Edited on Sun May-04-08 07:14 PM by nsd
If he doesn't do it on Tuesday, he'll do it on May 20 in Oregon. All is well. No need to worry. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC