Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nixon In A Pantsuit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:45 PM
Original message
Nixon In A Pantsuit
Edited on Sat May-03-08 01:49 PM by Stephanie


James Wolcott in Vanity Fair:




http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/06/wolcott200806

---snip---

MSNBC’s Chris Matthews is fond of repeating the political maxim “Democrats fall in love, Republicans fall in line,” and a halfhearted queue formed behind McCain’s candidacy despite the cranky impetuosities of a highly crafted nonconformity that grated on the Rush Limbaugh dittoheads, the Club for Growth tax-cut fanatics, and the nativists who wanted to Berlin Wall the border with Mexico to keep out the intruders causing Lou Dobbs such gastritis. Democrats had fallen in love with Obama, in heavy like with Hillary and Edwards. A born-again populist, Edwards functioned as a lubricant, a slick lining separating—and dampening the friction between—two competing iconographic surge forces (the first black presidential nominee versus the first female nominee) and drawing enough support on Daily Kos and other liberal-Dem Web sites to diffuse the animosity, competitive zeal, and gender-generational differences between the two camps. Once Edwards dropped out of the race, however, the buffer zone was removed, direct contact replaced triangulation, and the Obama and Hillary supporters faced off like the Jets and the Sharks. The rancor was disproportionate in intensity and extravagant in invective, a fervor worthy of ancestral foes. Months-old grievances seethed and erupted as if they had been bubbling for centuries in a lake of bad blood. On the most egoistic plane, it seemed like a clash of entitlements, the messianics versus the menopausals. The Obama-ites exuded the confidence of those who feel that they embody the future and are the seed bearers of energies and new modalities too long smothered under the thick haunches of the tired, old, entrenched way of doing things. The Hillarions felt a different imperative knocking at the gate of history, the long-overdue prospect of the first woman taking the presidential oath of office. For them, Hillary’s time had come, she had paid her dues, she had been thoroughly vetted, she had survived hairdos that would have sunk lesser mortals, and she didn’t let a little thing like being loathed by nearly half of the country bum her out and clog her transmission. Not since Nixon had there been such a show of grinding perseverance in the teeth of adversity, and Nixon in a pantsuit was never going to be an easy sell contrasted with the powerful embroidery of Obama’s eloquence—his very emergence on the political scene seemed like a feat of levitation. Hillary’s candidacy promised to make things better; Obama’s to make us better: outward improvement versus inward transformation. With Hillary, you would earn your merit badges; with Obama, your wings. Hillary’s candidacy was warmed-over meat loaf—comfort food for those too old or fearful to Dream.










Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nixon in a pantsuit....
ROFL :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's just begging for a photoshop job.
ROFL here too. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. here ya go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. Siamese twins...joined at the ass. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
39. I'd love to see how long ..
a photoshop of Obama w/ a crack pipe would last around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #39
48. Probably as long as Hillary's lead in the race..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Oh stop!!!!!
So glad your proud of post that shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #49
54. you're the one that brings up drug use
and I'm the villain? projection, aisle 3. projection, aisle 3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #49
71. If you can't stand the heat...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #49
86. Many of the people here seem to have no morals. at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #39
58. Ronny, that's hardly comparable
You may not like the comparison of Hillary to Nixon, or agree with it, but I'll say one thing for it: it's not sexist.

Your analogy, on the other hand...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. Oh please.
Lets see. Didn't Hillary work to IMPEACH NIXON?

Oh how we all forget when bashing Hillary is "just fun".

Bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonestonesusa Donating Member (630 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #39
82. Why do you have such a strong interest in seeing Obama with a crack pipe?
Edited on Sat May-03-08 10:19 PM by jonestonesusa
For the record, such an image would be flamed quickly. Is there a parallel image of Clinton you're objecting to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
80. LOVE IT! LMAO
great job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Looks like she's showing everyone how long her nose has grown with her lies. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bad, bad Stephanie!
Bad, bad pantsuit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh, is this about Michelle Obama?
whining like Nixon about her school loans, kids' dance lessons and whatever else she's whining about these days?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
79. No.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. 88 Obama, 79.4 Clinton


8.6 points make the difference between a liberal and "Nixon in a pantsuit"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
99. 11%.
Not insignificant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. M'dear, that writer also said this in the same piece:

(The majority of Huffpo’s high-profile contributors were so over the rainbow about Obama that it was as if they had found rapture in the poppy fields and were rolling around on their backs like ladybugs.)

??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Wolcott is an equal opportunity offender. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Yup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Yes he's a very funny writer - it's a great read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
35. Obviously James Wolcott knows about the feeling
level of happiness one can have with the prospect of getting one's country back.

That's right, Wolcott ..you describe it so well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Nixon was built better. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. To be fair, I wouldn't kiss either of them, but as Hunter S Thompson would say.........
"where's Nixon when you need him?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #17
42. LOL...
...:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. Nixon was more liberal.
But your subj line made me laugh out loug. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. "...warmed-over meat loaf—comfort food for those too old or fearful to Dream."
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
n/t

pnorman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
70. there's one born every minute, and they're all voting for obama. those of us 'old, fearful' realist
realists tend not to buy as much snake oil as the O voter type.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #70
77. Esteemed fellow DUer:
Edited on Sat May-03-08 08:29 PM by pnorman
You convey to this DU community, somewhat more about yourself than about me and/or the candidate whom I so warmly support.

(Let this bloody internecine bitterness be over by next week! We have a nation to recover, and a Constitution to bring back to life. EVERY shoulder needs to be pushing at the wheel, and as united as possible! LET'S DO IT!)

pnorman
On edit: Lighten up! That phrase I had excerpted was genuinely FUNNY! :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
12. Has she put on weight?
Edited on Sat May-03-08 02:02 PM by jefferson_dem
Just an observation...

I can only imagine the physical toll of a half-year straight campaigning, meals on the run, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canadian_is_cold Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
27. She has always been 'Rubenesque'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDoorbellRang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. Very nice wordsmithing -- loved the imagery on "freepers"
Easily herded, conservatives prefer to take their cues from on high, heeding the droppings of a Limbaugh or Sean Hannity rather than showing group initiative. In the absence of communiqués from headquarters, they revert to a larval stage of dormancy and let their grudges accrue. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
18. Is it misogyny time already?
Of course. It's always misogyny time at DU!

___

The Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy, now at my new home: Correntewire.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grassfed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. misandry unites hillbots
look it up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. Because any mention of pantsuits
is misogynist.

Don't argue with me, it just is.


Because I said so, that's why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #28
73. you're right. pantsuits are for manly women that don't wear dresses, like a woman should. honey, som
some of us remember when women weren't *allowed* to wear pants, and how furious folks like you were when that changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #73
90. Yves St Laurent "mainstreamed" the pantsuit in 1966. I was seven years old.
Edited on Sun May-04-08 09:06 AM by smoogatz
So, not furious. The whole not-shaving-anything trend of the early-mid 70s was kind of a bummer, though mercifully short-lived. Also, I'm still sad about the return of the bra and the demise of the tube top, but I understand the practical reasons why these things are so. I think what you're missing here is what's funny about Hillary's pantsuits: first, the color selection isn't great. Lilac? Peach? She looks like somebody's grandma down in Boca Raton. If she's going to wear pantsuits, as opposed to, you know, suits, or a pants/jacket combo, she should stick with black, gray and navy. And pantsuits themselves are just so retro: to me, they're iconic of the seventies and of much that was goofy about the seventies. Of course, you'd have to have a sense of humor to get that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
52. Hammer time my dear
I hope you're not doing anything stupid like thinking Vanilla Ice is gonna catch on or anything.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
72. no, it's not possible. if they didn't say "I hate women," then it's not misogyny. didn't you know th
that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #18
74. When I saw your headline
I thought...Don't you mean "again"? But you're right...always is more like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #18
95. misogyny=can't stand the Clintons.
Right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grassfed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
19. look how white i am!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
21. Wait 'til you hear her "Checkers" speech and refuse to bow out...oh, wait, she did that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
22. Is that a stain on her blue pantsuit? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #22
64. Knee-slapper! Much appreciatted!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
23. Even though I once challenged Wolcott to a fistfight...
I love how the man thinks and writes.
What a great piece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #23
38. A "fistfight"
The guy's like one hundred years old and four hundred pounds... A cadaver would put up more resistance...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #38
57. Okay...maybe that's why I was able to make Eudora Welty cry uncle
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #57
100. I laughed so hard I cried... what a visual... poor Eudora!! Thanks for the tears, LOL!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #23
40. Tell the story, please!

I'm thinking he's more of a verbal fighter???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. 20 years ago, my college mentor brought Wolcott to the university for a talk...
during which Wolcott blamed Truman Capote for Tama Janowitz and Jay McInhery(sp?)
Afterwards, there was lots of alcohol flowing. I took exception to his blaming Capote for those twits and challenged him to go outside. Eventually, everything settled down and Walcott and I had a very pleasant conversation. I like to imagine that he has more than once told the story of the time the shirtless drunk guy in a leather jacket volunteered to kick his ass in defense of Truman Capote :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #45
59. LOL, that's great!

And you know he tells the story in grand form.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canadian_is_cold Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
24. I swear, it was THIS big! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. clenis? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
29. Wow...I thought I read a few weeks ago that
Wolcott was for hilary? And now he's givin' us bon mots about "nixon in a pantsuit"?

My son said a couple of months ago that "hilary was bush in a pantsuit".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lwcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. You must be very proud n/t


___

The Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy, now at my new home: Correntewire.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. I'm Proud Of Him !!!
Very perceptive kid.

Wish I could say the same for some here.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. I don't know what ignore said..
thanks, Willy! It's his first time into politics..Obama did it for him and he thanked me for being so active for the last 8 years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #37
44. Right On !!! - Give Both Yourselves A Hug For Me !!!
:hi:

:grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. Thanks...he's over on Kauai and
I'm gonna call him if Obama wins Guam:grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #29
46. He states in the article that he voted for her.
Edited on Sat May-03-08 02:53 PM by Stephanie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychopomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #29
88. Great comic
...bottom line is, she ain't acting like a Democrat! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
30. Ruh Roh !!! ..."The Messianics Versus The Menopausals"...
:hide::popcorn::hide:

That's gonna cause some trouble.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
31. The Nixon analogy is an apt one.
She reminds me in many ways of Nixon, and no, not the pantsuit thing. But her problem is Obama is RFK - alive this time.

Nixon had no chance against RFK. But he caught a "break."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
33. How come Obama
is the one always giving a "Checker's Speech"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Those humble beginnings--

deja vu for this elder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. Well Michelle doesn't have a cloth coat from what I hear.
Miss Thang's got her self a mink. Probably from Dicker and Dicker of Beverly Hills!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kid a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
43. I prefer the "warmed-over meatloaf" line in this snip. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
50. Oh please...........
All the left wing outlets are having a conniption fit because she hasn't dropped out and made way for the Anointed One. They want to see this inexperienced guy in office so desperately that, short of taking out a hit on her, they have no other option than to vilify her every chance they get in the hopes that people stop voting for her.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. Wolcott did vote for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. "left wing" vs "right wing". That's a good start n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. Not every Democrat is far to the left.
There are some of us who are moderates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #50
92. You think Obama has been anointed? Or you perceive that others view him as anointed?
Edited on Sun May-04-08 10:40 AM by gristy
You should perhaps look inward to see where that perception comes from. Are you a religious person yourself? I suspect you may be.

Or are you an analytical type or are you employed in the field of accounting, science, engineering, or mathematics? I suspect you are not, especially not math.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
56. Not just any NIxon. The 1960 Nixon
The one that didn't "get" TV, just as our current Nixon doesn't "get" the Internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #56
60. that's not the half of what she doesn't "get"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
62. Mr. Walcott wields a sharp blade
This one's a keeper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
63. Hillary is very much like Nixon in some ways.
Edited on Sat May-03-08 06:04 PM by NJSecularist
Nixon had an innate drive for winning. He simply refused to be denied. Much like Hillary.

She is on her way to an epic comeback to win the nomination and then the presidency. Nixon had a penchant for comebacks too. He lost the presidential election in 1960 by the slightest of margins, got smacked around in the California gubernatorial race in 1962, was left for the dead by the press, and then made his epic comeback in 1968.

I do see the similarities. Unfortunately, the Obamites might not like the comparision, but the comparision is looking more and more likely by the day.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #63
65. Go back and re-read what you just said.
It's deeper than a refusal to admit you're losing. It's an inability to make any sense at all.

Nixon is a survivor?

Honey, look up "watergate" and "impeach." You really, really, really don't want to use Nixon as a model for anyone you like.

Really, you don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. I am well aware of Watergate.
As I said, the comparision to Nixon is not perfect. But Hillary has the same innate drive to win and ability to make a comeback that Nixon did. That is where the comparisons end. We all know about Nixon's trangressions regarding the cover-up of the Watergate break-in during his presidency, but he was left for the dead in 1962 and everybody said his political career was dead. He later went on to win the election in 1968. Hillary was left for the dead twice, after Iowa and then after Wisconsin, and she bounced back both times and has a chance to win the nomination and the presidency much like Nixon.

Honey, go look up "Nixon in 1962".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #63
93. How will Clinton achieve this "epic comeback"? What will the numbers look like?
You make the claim. Back it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #93
96. She is well on her way to achieving such. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #96
97. Funny!
Back it up, slick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #97
98. She can win Indiana, West Virginia, Kentucky, Puerto Rico and win the nomination. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #98
101. Now you're just being silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
66. Hysterical piece: Some juicy bits:
"The Hillarions felt a different imperative knocking at the gate of history, the long-overdue prospect of the first woman taking the presidential oath of office. For them, Hillary’s time had come, she had paid her dues, she had been thoroughly vetted, she had survived hairdos that would have sunk lesser mortals, and she didn’t let a little thing like being loathed by nearly half of the country bum her out and clog her transmission. Not since Nixon had there been such a show of grinding perseverance in the teeth of adversity, and Nixon in a pantsuit was never going to be an easy sell contrasted with the powerful embroidery of Obama’s eloquence—his very emergence on the political scene seemed like a feat of levitation. Hillary’s candidacy promised to make things better; Obama’s to make us better: outward improvement versus inward transformation. With Hillary, you would earn your merit badges; with Obama, your wings. Hillary’s candidacy was warmed-over meat loaf—comfort food for those too old or fearful to Dream.

In a column for The Times of London entitled “The Clintons, a Horror Film That Never Ends,” Sullivan compared Hillary to Glenn Close’s bunny boiler in Fatal Attraction—“Whoosh! She’s back at your throat!”—and the Clintons as a couple to the fast-running zombies in 28 Days Later. “The Clintons live off psychodrama,” he contended in a classic pot-kettle-black moment.



Easily herded, conservatives prefer to take their cues from on high, heeding the droppings of a Limbaugh or Sean Hannity rather than showing group initiative. In the absence of communiqués from headquarters, they revert to a larval stage of dormancy and let their grudges accrue.

I may subscribe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. Oh I do subscribe!
It's excellent - lots more political reporting than you might think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
69. quick! somebody get Obama a flight suit so we can see what a real man, uh real president looks like.
you people are pathetic, and you're constantly crying about how what a dirty campaign hillary is allegedly running. try looking in the mirror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
75. K&R Lmao
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
76. Interesting article
THANKS for posting it. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
78. I just used this pic in a video


:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
81. Mercy! "...warmed-over meat loaf—comfort food for those too old or fearful to Dream."
"With Hillary, you would earn your merit badges; with Obama, your wings. Hillary’s candidacy was warmed-over meat loaf—comfort food for those too old or fearful to Dream."

A couple years ago, someone Kos-diarey'd a great little piece of writing comparing the Clinton nostalgia to hanging on to "faded old love letters, years later still in the back of the dresser drawer.."

The world has changed. It's time clean out the drawers and lighten up the baggage a little.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #81
84.  Fucking Alexander Wolcott -- some hyper-luxe-latte-liberal, uptown-NYC-$10K-a-month-rent
what a stellar exemplar of the new elite. If the Repukes would just start wearing Birkenstocks and driving Priuses, there'd be no reason why people like Wolcott wouldn't be ever so happy to switch over to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #84
94. Two questions
1. Who is Alexander Wolcott?
2. Why are you here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
83. Kick. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaldem4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
85. K&R!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judasdisney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
87. Hillary Kissinger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
89. Right on Dude! No fat chicks for president! Obama's da Man!...well, he's a man, and he's not fat; th
that's what really counts in a president. GOBAMA!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
91. Shes a pig, just like Nixxon was..
I'm beginning to think that she doesn't just have oodles of Issues, but that Clinton is actually fucking certifiable..

She's nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
102. too old and fearful to dream
pretty much sums me up...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC