Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Wisdom of Crowds - Why our little teacup tempests in DU are meaningless

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:39 PM
Original message
The Wisdom of Crowds - Why our little teacup tempests in DU are meaningless

“No one in this world, so far as I know, has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people.” —H. L. Mencken



Mencken was wrong.

For all of us who consider ourselves 'experts' in something, it's tough to accept and a rude whack up alongside the head, but we're not all that smart. Any bonafide expert may be smarter than the average member of a crowd, but he/she is not smarter than the crowd as a whole.

There are certainly ways to pervert that fact, but those pathologies don't change the fact. Given these elements, the crowd wins:


Diversity of opinion

Each person should have private information even if it's just an eccentric interpretation of the known facts.

That's a given.

Independence

People's opinions aren't determined by the opinions of those around them.

Tougher to acheive, especially when the 'experts' all deride their 'lessers'.

Decentralization

People are able to specialize and draw on local knowledge.

Got that one, although the Internet actually doesn't help.

Aggregation

Some mechanism exists for turning private judgments into a collective decision.

Got that, too, as long as the voting machines work and the mail doesn't get lost.

(see: Surowiecki, O’Reilly, Hutton, even Machiavelli (section LVIII)



So, for those of the DU-sphere who have a problem with 'the sheeple', 'joe sixpack', 'xxx-bots' or 'xxxx-maniacs', lighten up. Yes, the hoi-polloi may get it wrong sometimes, may not have shiny discourse and argumentation skills and may not even write good, but they're smarter than we are. In the long run, the crowd wins, and that's a good thing, and it's just about the only thing that gives me any confidence in the long run.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bravo!!!! Great Post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, but DU isn't "the crowd"--we're just a small mob off to the side of the crowd.
Otherwise, President Kerry would be finishing his first term.

And President Dean would have kicked Senator Kerry's ass in the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Exact;ly my point, I thought...
DU would like to believe we're a conclave of experts with better opinions than everybody else. It just isn't so. We're just bozos on the bus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. With respect, I disagree. Hoi polloi may be greater in force of numbers, but no, they're not wiser.
Edited on Sat May-03-08 03:40 PM by IntravenousDemilo
Individually, people are mostly big sacks of self-interested venality, but taken together, they're big sacks of self-interested venality squared. All the mob does is validate and confirm the pinheaded opinions of the majority of its members -- "Well most of the people agree with me that the earth is flat, so it must be so." Conventional wisdom is more conventional than wise, and when something becomes popular, one is right to mistrust it. That's why ad populum is considered a logical fallacy: the vast majority of people have no idea what they're talking about, especially in areas outside their expertise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Did you look at any of the links I provided?
It turns out that you're likely wrong in that opinion. Given the requirements I listed, the crowd does better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Some mechanism exists for turning private judgments into a collective decision."
Guesses:

Religion
Government
Knowledge
Instinct
Tribalism
Self-preservation
Word-of-mouth
Electronic communication
Magic
Herd mentality
Omniscience
Vision






:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Voting? Caucuses? Conventions? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. "Government" covers that.
Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yes, I agree while we're talking about politics.
The concept extends to lots of other realms where the mechanism might not be managed by the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. Diversity of opinion + Independence + Decentralization + Aggregation = Internet influenced voting.
I believe the Internet creates a greater mind than the individual people which make up it's posts or blogs. The Internet is increasingly becoming more of the crowd everyday and everybody can bring something to the table.

Thanks for the thread RichardRay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 04:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC