Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If you hate Hillary... it's probably for all the wrong reasons

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:57 PM
Original message
If you hate Hillary... it's probably for all the wrong reasons
You might hate her for refusing to quit the fight.
You might hate her for playing too hard to win.
You might hate her for bringing a gun to a knife-fight.
You might hate her for because she ain't no bandleader.
You might hate her for not being dainty enough while she's
chopping and cutting her opponent off at the knees.

...but isn't that exactly what we asked her to do? The worst that could happen is she'd win and take the White House in November.
Odd that some people get angry when they finally get exactly what they want. For eight years, we've been asking for a fighter instead of a lame, surrender-early quitter.

May I ask a question? If our choices are doing the right thing and losing with Obama because fair is fair OR doing the wrong thing and winning with Hillary, would not this be what the super-delegates are for?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KansasVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. When she mocked me she lost me forever!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. good for you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. I dont hate her, I distrust her because shes demonstrated and discussed her views
and she represents those positions closer to republican planks then democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. sure thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. Take a look
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 03:29 AM
Response to Reply #15
35. DING!!! DING!!! DING!!
The truth shall set you free...


Goldwater girl
Former board member of Wal Mart
Supporter of NAFTA

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. And YOU BenDavid, hate Obama because you perceive him as being not pro-Jewish enough.....
...tell the truth.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Levgreee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. You'd hate Obama if he did those things to Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
21. Can you show me on this doll exactly where?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. I don't hate her, but she lies too much for my taste
and she has no problem insulting the intelligence of voters. I take offense to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
53. That's her base you're talking about
She panders and prays on those lazy people who collect their news from M$M or those who feel too weak and afraid to fight an entrenched establishment

It's probably not even that she lies so much but more of process of her being on the receiving end of herd of stock that has been baffled and bamboozled into believing so many things that just are not true. That idea of a free lunch and free gas come to mind for me, the idea that legislatures just need to enact laws and cut checks that will make us all rich. The ignorant masses who do not suspect a system that is pointed and turned on to working on them. They unknowingly, their own worst enemy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. I can't stand her because she voted for the war; aligned herself with McCain;
threatened to obliterate Iraq; had her surrogates play the race card; has run a nasty, pandering, below-the-belt campaign; whines whenever she doesn't get her way; keeps trying to change the rules and designate which states and voters "count" and which ones don't; has acted like an arrogant queen who is entitled to the nomination and how dare the little people stand in the way ... and on and on ...

Also, I don't want her as our nominee because she will sink us in the fall.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Those are all great reasons. What Oregonian said. Add that to my list. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
28. More reasons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. I just don't like pantsuited panderbears, or people who lie about
sniper fire...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
9. No, I hate her for all the right reasons. Seriously. nt





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
10. Don't presume to tell me why I hate Hillary Clinton, and then put up a bunch of horseshit...
I hate her because she earned it.

I hate her because she uses worse tactics than Bush/Rove/Atwater.

I hate her because she has been malicious and vicious when there was no reason to. She tried to take advantage of Obama's taking the high road, throwing the lowest kind of pig-slop at him, counting on the fact that he would not return in kind.

I hate her because she blows rightwing media filth to try to get her nose closer to the anuses of the Republican voters who put her, and us, through hell for 8 years, and who will not vote for her anyway, no matter how often she blows O'Reilly.

I hate her because she has made women weak by her fake blubbering to get sympathy and constantly whining about how she is such a victim of sexism, ageism, whatevderism.

I hate her because she's made it harder for women in the future to make a successful run for president.

I hate her because she made a profit, and built her power base, by sending American jobs to India, impoverishing American workers in the process.

I hate her because she is a lying hypocrite, promising to bring jobs back to America and create new jobs for America, at the same time she is promising her India outsourcing corporate benefactors that outsourcing will continue and not to worry about the American worker backlash.

I could go on and on, but I think you get the drift.

So don't EVEN pull that happy horseshit, trying to make poor widdle Hiwwary the widdle victim again. You just amp up the hate for her when you do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
60. Thank you for saying it all so well.
I will not vote for that woman in this lifetime or the next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graycem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
12. You want
super delegates to give her the nomination even though she's unable to beat him, on the basis that she says he's unelectable. Pardon me if I think her opinion of his electability is a LITTLE biased. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
13. Fail!
None of those reasons is why I hate her.

Nice try. :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
14. You probably hate Obama for all the right reasons.
Maybe you could list a few.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datopbanana Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
16. You might hate her for refusing to work with others/compromise for health care in the 90s
ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
17. You just discribed George Bush and Joe Lieberman's Baby


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judasdisney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 05:38 AM
Response to Reply #17
42. I get the impression BenDavid is an unequivocal Lieberman fan, whatever the cost
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
parasim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
19. Winning the Rove way is f'in stupid.
No, we need change in this country. Politics played as it always has been is getting this country nowhere.

I am so tired of win at all costs, when the country is continuing to spiral out of control.

by the way, I don't hate Hillary. I hate what this country has become because of the corporate enablers that have run it. and I hate the politics that keeps them in power.

Sure maybe Obama will end up being the same old same old, but perhaps he won't be. and that's a big perhaps. It's pretty certain what will happen if either McCain or Clinton get in there.

I will support Clinton if she is the nominee, because a Democrat is better than a Republican in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 03:37 AM
Response to Reply #19
36. Even a DINO Dem like Hillary?
Edited on Tue May-06-08 03:40 AM by ikojo
This support a D at all costs is what has moved the Democratic party further and further to the right and closer to being the Republicans. It is why Hillary feels she does not need to answer to the base. Rather than talk of bolting the party (as the Republican base does when they don't get their way, the Dem base says a D (even a pro corporate anti worker D) is better than any Republican). I am not sure what I will do in November if Hillary manages to finagle the nomination. I just don't know.

IF she manages to finagle the nomination, I do not think she is electable. She has EXTREMELY high negatives among the general electorate. The right wing loathes her more than many people on this board. They will bring out all of the heavy artillery to defeat her, even though McCain is not their ideal candidate, he is not Hillary. For them it will be ABH, anyone but Hillary.

Heck my extreme right-wing fundamentalist sister voted for Obama in the Illinois primary because she cannot stand Hillary! Come November if HRC is the nominee, my sister will cast a vote for McCain.

Once again the DLC is possibly handing the Democrats defeat in the jaws of victory, just like they did in 1994, 1996, 1998, 2000, 2002, 2004. The DLC (Republican lite) way is the way of the past. Obama is the future, even if he's a tad compromised because of his continued support for funding the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cottonseed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
20. The SDs are for Obama.
Edited on Tue May-06-08 12:10 AM by cottonseed
What's happened the last few days, since Feb 5th, and what's going to happen after tomorrow will bear that out. I think it's great that she's a fighter and all. It is to some degree a very desirable trait. Unfortunately, she's just not going to win this thing. The Super Delegates are her play, and they're all running away from her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 03:49 AM
Response to Reply #20
39. She's a fighter all right but it's for corporate interests
and not the interests of working people. How hard did she fight while serving on Wal Mart's board? Sam Walton didn't call her a great lawyer because she was defending Wal Mart workers, of that you can rest assured!!!


She wasn't fighting for poor people when she and her husband championed and passed welfare reform for people, but not welfare reform for dependent corporations.

Hillary is hardly the champion of the working class (a class of folks she knows nothing about)

http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/feb2008/db20080227_145224.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index_top+story

Is Hillary Clinton Good for Business?
Trailing Obama, Clinton is pumping up the populist rhetoric in Ohio and Texas. But as her record and contributions show, she's no enemy of Corporate America

snip

Follow the Money

But while Clinton's talk is tough—on opposing tax cuts for the wealthy, the influence of special interests like health insurance companies, and Big Oil—her record and support base indicate she's hardly an enemy of American business interests. Some of the biggest names on Wall Street—including John Mack, Chief Executive Officer of Morgan Stanley (MS) and Steve Rattner, managing principal of the Quadrangle Group—have publicly endorsed Clinton. She has more maxed-out, executive-level donors than either Obama or Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) and has pulled in $3.9 million from donors associated with the health-care industry, more than any other candidate. Donors affiliated with Goldman Sachs (GS) are her top contributors.

snip

Wall Street is fairly comfortable with Clinton. " has been a New York senator for seven years, and New York is the financial capital of the U.S. and the world," says Roger Altman, senior Clinton economic adviser and co-founder of Evercore Partners (EVR), an investment and advisory company in New York. "CEOs and other business leaders have had the chance to work with her very close quarters. If you ask leaders of the financial community if there's anything to be afraid of, 80% or more would say no."

Indeed, some industries would gain considerably if Clinton were elected. Her "Economic Blueprint" calls for the creation of a $50 billion Strategic Energy Fund to support alternative energy industries. "With her record and proposals, there is great visibility in terms of what you get with Hillary Clinton," says Bryan Sherbacow, 39, chief operating officer of Charleston (S.C.)-based Ethanex Energy, an ethanol producer. "With George Bush a lot of people didn't know what they were voting for, and aren't willing to take that chance again." Sherbacow and his wife have maxed out on donations to Clinton, contributing $2,300 each for the primaries.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
22. I'm disgusted by her, but I don't hate her.
You might hate her for not being dainty enough while she's
chopping and cutting her opponent off at the knees.


You don't do that to a fellow Democrat during a primary. Fuck her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
24. Hmmm... interesting... I think that is what the supreme court....
justices... probably tell themselves every night before bed in regards to Bush Vs. Gore... "they could have done the right thing or they could do the wrong thing and have their party win the whitehouse...


now I get it... It's only wrong if it's the other side stealing the election. Screw the popular vote and delegate count... we don't need democracy we just need to win the GE. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
25. No, it's like this ...
No one hates her for refusing to quit the fight, but for fighting dirty.

No one hates her for playing 'too hard to win', but for trying to change the rules of the game in order to 'win'.

Her 'daintiness' was never the issue - the fact that she was 'cutting her opponent off at the knees' is. Her 'opponent' is a fellow Democrat, and someone she knew was, in all probability, going to be our party's nominee.

A primary is a means to prove to the voters your qualifications for the office - not an arena in which to 'throw' the kitchen sink.

She could have used her campaign as an opportunity to show us how tough an opponent she would be for McCain - but instead she told us how much better qualified he was for POTUS than her fellow Democrat.

"Isn't this exactly what we asked her to do?" No, not by a long-shot.

"If our choices are doing the right thing and losing with Obama because fair is fair, OR doing the wrong thing and winning with Hillary, would not this be what the super-delegates are for?"

You might have noticed that the SuperDelegates are now endorsing Obama in larger numbers than are endorsing Hillary. The SD lead she started this race with has all but evaporated. So Obama's nomination will be fair and, according to the SDs, the right thing to do in order to win the GE.

Which begs the question as to what the next option will be that you propose. Maybe having the Supreme Court decide to install Hillary?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judasdisney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #25
43. Nance, don't dance with the passive-aggressive. It only encourages them.
You're answering the questions of a passive-aggressive manipulator who knows exactly what the answers to his own questions are. It's exactly parallel to legitimizing Neocon complaints about transparency or voter fraud or anything else they're willing to accuse with but don't give a rat's ass about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #25
63. Well said NanceGreggs
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAbuchan08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
26. "...but isn't that exactly what we asked her to do? "
Edited on Tue May-06-08 01:32 AM by Gonnabuymeagun
Ummm... no... maybe you did... I didn't.

"For eight years, we've been asking for a fighter instead of a lame, surrender-early quitter."

Hillary is like a hockey team that can fight, but isn't able to score goals. She fights on the wrong issues and ultimately achieves the opposite of what she should be.

Witness IWR, Kyle Leiberman etc.

What good does a fighter do us if half the time she's fighting for the Republicans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
27. They wanted lame, they got lame, when he quits early after McCain wins
then they may finally get it.

Good post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
29. Hillary isn't more electable than Obama, it's an absurd argument
Hillary Clinton is just as easy to paint as an out of touch liberal as Obama is. "Reagan Democrats" aren't going to be flocking back to her. There are certain politicians like Bill Clinton and Jim Webb that can actually connect with SOME of these voters, enough to push them over the top in certain red states. Hillary Clinton is not one of those politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Umbram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
30. The word hate gets tossed around here too much.
People that find themselves 'hating' need hobbies other than GD: P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
31. Most people don't like her, it's true. The numbers are growing.
I don't like her at all, but it's mainly because of her fascist ideology. Had enough of that. We need a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
32. I love her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
33. I do not like her because she is a lying, pandering, mean-spirited, calculating pest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PseudoIntellect Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
34. The worst thing that could happen is clearly not that she'd win and take the White House.
Edited on Tue May-06-08 02:23 AM by PseudoIntellect
Otherwise, the whole party would be happy right now.

They're not, because Hillary is lowering Obama's GE chances though he is clearly the front-runner.

"If our choices are doing the right thing and losing with Obama because fair is fair OR doing the wrong thing and winning with Hillary, would not this be what the super-delegates are for?"

Yes, if only. "If only" is the campaign slogan these days? We have two great candidates who can both win the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
37. she's a loser and a sucky fighter.
she's constantly damaging herself worse than her opponent. she should have won in a walk. and I don't hate her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 03:42 AM
Response to Original message
38. We ask that for a fight with the Republicans not to take it to this extent with our own...
Edited on Tue May-06-08 03:45 AM by barack the house
Hillary has not once to my recollection addressed McCain Obama has.The ludicoursness of taking it this far with our own she is offending all those who need to vote for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
40. How does it feel knowing that Hillary has written a concession speech
just in case she has to give it later today? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
41. Does Hillary love black people as much as you do?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
44. The people who hate Hillary hate her because of their own false accusations against her. Weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:22 AM
Response to Reply #44
46. NO, she has earned the hate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
45. No
I hate her because shes a dishonest, lying, self serving, back stabbing, rovian, power hungry sociopath who will do anything or say anything to get the power that she believes is rightfully hers. In addition to that I hate her for the abuses of power she committed and attempted to commit while her husband was president.

BTW, Obama has much better chance of beating McCain then Hillary does. The republicans have been preparing for hillary fr years. They are salivating over the idea of a hillary candidacy. hillary will never be president . get used to it. she is despised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gbrenna Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
47. I don't hate Sen. Clinton
However, I don't like her because she has no chance to win the nomination and is costing Sen. Obama money and time which would be better spent fighting McCain. I think Sen. Clinton is hurting the Democratic Party and helping the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
48. No, I hate her because she plays dirty...
against a fellow team mate. Oh and then there is that pesky Iraq vote she hasnt apologized for.

Oh yeah, then there's that obliterate Iran garbage.

I'd respect her if she were truly fighting for anyone OTHER than herself.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
49. Wrong as usual. But thanks for playing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
50. It's not hate...it's pity...and it's seeing someone who cares more about herself than her party
Bringing a gun to a knife-fight? She's chopping and cutting her opponent off at the knees?

SHE LOST.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
51. I don't hate her or her husband but
I want them to go away. I'm tired of looking at and hearing both of them. They had their place in history, but it's time for someone new.

As to your last question. We will not lose with Obama. The majority of people in this country are sick of politics as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
52. If she'd been doing what I expected of her...
...I'd be supporting her joyously now, rather than leaning the other way.

I would have loved to have seen her fight even half so hard for anything besides the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
54. I appreciate all the pro and con replies, but what about the
question I posed. Do you lose with obama or win with hrc? Simple as that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #54
58. False question.... It's lose with HRC or win with Obama.... Simple as that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #54
64. Neither.
We win with Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
55. how about hating her for NEVER apologizing for IWR and taking Lobbyist money???
Edited on Tue May-06-08 12:36 PM by LSK
Want to refute that somehow??? Oh and her Iran hawkish stance would be a 3rd reason.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gal Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
56. I'd rather lose honorably.
I have values and expect the people I vote for to have some as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
57. I don't "hate" Hillary. But I don't want her to be the nominee for both moral AND political reasons.
I think Obama will be the stronger candidate. Far and away; that's why the media is trying so hard to torpedo him with bullshit about reverends and flag pins.

And he's BEATING your plucky, scrappy, sink-throwing, kneecap-breaking alley fighter. He's WINNING.


Hillary started to lose me when she got to the senate and voted for the IWR. That has nothing to do with her being "scrappy" and everything to do with her MAKING A SERIOUSLY ERRONEOUS CALL THAT BRINGS HER JUDGMENT INTO QUESTION.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
59. I hate her because she's a CLOSED GOVERNMENT DEMOCRAT who protects BushInc and
his powerful elite cronies.

She would continue the pretection of their secrecy and privilege into the next decade just as Bill did throughout the 90s.

THAT is what YOU support - closed government. I never will and will fight you every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
61. Call me sexist, but...
I like the thought of a woman president precisely because I hate all the bravado that leaders in America tend to put on. I was hoping more women in power would soften our image a bit and prove that we don't have to act like cavemen to get the job done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
62. None of those points touch on why I wouldn't vote for Hillary
for me they're

I will not vote for a candidate that is a DLC member
I will not vote for a candidate that is an admitted liar (Bosnia incident)
I will not vote for a candidate named Clinton or Bush because I am against "family dynasties" as if we were a monarchy
I will not vote for a candidate that praises a Republican candidate as more qualified than your Democratic opponent
I will not vote for a candidate that resorts to pandering for votes

So for me, getting Hillary would be exactly getting everything I don't want in a President. For 8 years we have been asking for a fighter, but it only works when they fight for the right things.

I also think that stating emphatically that Obama will lose the GE as if you have some super knowledge that this is a foregone conclusion is suspect and not a likely statement from a true Democrat.

Have a nice day! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
65. Reasons she's a DINO: War Votes, NAFTA, Telecommunications Act, Corporate & lobbyist friendly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 04:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC