Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Terry McAuliffe discusses Obama campaign's "meaningless" plan to declare victory on May 20

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 02:00 PM
Original message
Terry McAuliffe discusses Obama campaign's "meaningless" plan to declare victory on May 20
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Fox News. I know.

:eyes:

Obama to Declare Win, Come Hill Or High Water

Thursday, May 8, 2008

http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/05/08/obama-to-declare-win-come-hill-or-high-water/

Barack Obama is looking at May 20 as the end date for his Democratic primary run, even though that date won’t seal the deal. After a victory in North Carolina on Tuesday night and a closer-than-expected loss in Indiana, Obama campaign manager David Plouffe said that, based on calculations, Obama will win a majority of pledged delegates on May 20.

West Virginia votes Tuesday, and Kentucky and Oregon follow on the 20th. Hillary Clinton is expected to win West Virginia and Kentucky, while Obama is banking on victory in Oregon.

Clinton campaign chairman Terry McAuliffe told FOXNews.com on Thursday that the Obama camp’s plan to declare victory based on a pledged delegate majority is “meaningless.” He said that a candidate will need a majority of the pledged delegates and the unpledged superdelegates combined to be the true winner.

“Until you get to twenty-twenty-five or twenty-two-oh-nine, none of this matters,” McAuliffe said, referring to the numbers being bandied about as the number of votes needed. “In order to have a majority of the delegates seated at the national convention, that’s how you get to become the nominee, not the pledged,” McAuliffe said. “If that’s the case, take everyone of the superdelegates away from him, if he doesn’t care about them.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. it seemed to work well for Bush, back in Nov & Dec of '00
and I don't think he would have said it if he did not "know" how many Supers he really has in the "bank":)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. McAuliffe is right.
Until Obama gets 2025 delegates, he hasn't won anything.

Obama is doing his best Bush impression:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. At least get your Hil-Bot talking points right...
it's 2205 or 2209 now, remember :rofl:




GOBAMA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madaboutharry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. I heard him this morning on the Bill Press show
and he sounded like a carnival barker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. McAuliffe said 2025? What a gaffe. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. The question is when is Hillary Clinton going to fire Terry McAuliffe?
Whatever he says at this point is MEANINGLESS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Youphemism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. This Is an Obama Camp Mistake

Obama can spend most of his campaign time talking about McCain. He can skip some campaigning to raise money or work on some strategy for the general election.

But declaring victory at all is a mistake. He should let victory come to him.

Otherwise, he's going to piss off the Clinton voters who are already feeling like everyone is telling them to just go away. Of course, that's exactly what they *are* being told.

But Obama needs the Clinton voters, and any perception of him stepping around her will hurt him -- and it really isn't necessary. The only thing left to decide is the day he gets anointed, and choosing that day is about the only card Hillary has left to play. He should just let her play it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-08-08 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. and people give a shit what this tool says because..?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 02:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC