Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If She Ran as a Feminist, with Feminist Values, She Probably Would Have Beaten Obama.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:33 AM
Original message
If She Ran as a Feminist, with Feminist Values, She Probably Would Have Beaten Obama.
A NYT Graph http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/05/09/us/politics/20080509_SUPERS_GRAPHIC.html?ex=1211083200&en=2f960bca3ea263cd&ei=5070&emc=eta3 that
Reveals the Tone Deaf Mismanaged Clinton Campaign "Appeal" to Superdelegates. It Wasn't Her Gender; It was a Botched Campaign, Running on Old Style Politics, Without a Vision. If She Ran as a Feminist, with Feminist Values, She Probably Would Have Beaten Obama. But Hillary Clinton Ran as If She Had to Show That She Had More Testosterone and Ruthlessness Than the Guys in the Race.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not exactly a related question: How did Margaret Thatcher run in the 1980s?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Isnt that the "old style politics" the OP mentioned?
Thatcher was so conservative she made Reagan look like a moderate.

Im not sure that strategy would be a winner in this day and age of a populace that feels they've been taken advantage of by conservative interests for the last 25 years.

(Something Clinton should have thought of before aiming to be another Thatcher for the last 7 years.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. To be fair, the Prime Minister of Great Britain is elected differently than we elect a President ...
The public elects their Parliament, then the ruling party of Parliament picks the Prime Minister. The whole system is a bit more complicated than that, but that's the simplest way to put it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. she was not allowed to. Any mention of feminisim, gender and she was
attacked. Had she run as a feminist, the guys would have hated her. The mem is that women are not strong enough, are irrational..and if you look at Obama's comments about her, that is exactly what he was playing up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. No. She'd scare away too many men. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. Don't count your chickens before
they are hatched.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. uh huh, and If ands and buts were candy and nuts we have Hanukah
and Christmas everyday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. BINGO
:applause:

If she ran as a feminist with feminist values, she probably would have beaten Obama. But instead, she ran a campaign that whistled to and winked at the lowest denominator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. If she ran as a democrat she would have beaten Obama...
Most of the people I know who were originally for her and abandoned her along the way did so because of things like the obliterating Iran line or touting McCain's readiness, or dismissing the importance of the African American vote, or playing coy when asked about the whole Obama muslim thing, or any number of other things she pulled from the Rove Republican playbook.

No amount of feminism or anti-feminism was going to wipe that slate clean for me and many others I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
9. Honest answer: Her problem is that she ran as a Clinton
She surrounded herself with all the old names and faces: Begala, Carville, Davis, McCauliffe (not to mention Bill), etc., etc., and at the same time said she was for "change". That was her real downfall (in addition to having the idiot Penn run her campaign). How can anyone make a credible argument for change when they surround themselves with all the trappings of the Bill Clinton Administration? Is it any surprise that "change" did not work for her when the visual and audio messages were clearly that she was promising a third (Bill) Clinton Administration?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. I think you're right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. Ding, Ding, Ding
We have a winner!!!


:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nancy Waterman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. The Great Irony
The irony is that I, for one, have wanted a woman president for a long time to get away from the out-of-control testosterone and big-ego style of politics especially strong in the last few years, but even dating from before Bush. But Hillary has focused on the more testosterone-related attributes: aggressiveness, toughness, fighter, hawkish foreign policy, drinking shots with the boys, etc. It is Obama who manifests what I was thinking of when I wanted a woman: someone who doesn't jump immediately to aggression, someone who is thoughtful about things and conciliatory except in matters of extreme importance, able to work with others, etc. To me this is a great irony indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frickaline Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
11. yep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
12. Women outnumber men as voters nationally and in most states....
...Clinton did not attract enough women of all kinds - feminists or not. Reason?

Not all women, in fact not many women are feminists and never will be.

The quote in the OP above is nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. PBS broke down the female vote today. 49% voted for Clinton, 47% voted for Obama.......
I keep hearing the Clinton meme that "Obama couldn't get 53% of the female vote"; but what does it say about Hillary that she couldn't break the 50% mark with women? She's down to single digits in the AA community, and I have heard people on this very board say that the AA community makes up a very small percentage of overall voters, somewhere around 12%, and that she can afford to not have the AA vote turnout. Here's something they fail to realize. Even if the AA community dropped from 12% to 10%, it could cost us the election in a big way.

Here's the stark reality, Kerry won PA, MN, and WI by less than 2%, and lost OH, NV, NM, and IA by less than 2% of the vote. That's two states that could have easily swung to Bush, or four states that could have swung to us.

Does Obama have to swing more women to vote for him? Yes.

On the other hand, Hillary has to swing more women, AND convince the AA community to turn out the same numbers that they will for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. No Way In Hell Would That Have Worked. Not A Chance.
She definitely made some mistakes along the way and definitely took way too much for granted early on, but if she would've ran as a feminist she wouldn't have had a prayer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Okay, it would be a mistake for a woman to run as a woman.
:eyes:

Whatever you say...

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Stop Making Up Points That Weren't Put Forth To Begin With.
It makes you look out of touch with reality and a bit silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Wow, you alerted on me for calling your statement misogynistic...
Edited on Sat May-10-08 03:19 PM by ClassWarrior
...yet you call me an idiot, out of touch with reality, and silly?

Talk about double standards. Or triple. Or quadruple.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. There Ya Go With The Delusions Again. You Need To Get A Grip A Bit.
I alerted on nothing, so you might want to try and keep your paranoia in check.

And yes, I did call you those things. If ya don't like the labels, then you probably should work a bit harder at not earning them so well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Fish in a barrel.
:rofl:

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. heh. if only that were true. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
23. She's the anti-feminist - she pretends to be a man & then whines when big bad men are mean to her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
25. If she had started her Senate Career by doing the right thing, like with the IWR, she would've won.
She lost a lot of us through blatant political pandering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
26. Exactly. What Jersey Devil said in post #9 too n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
29. If she wanted to run as a feminist
She wouldn't have voted for the war. It is obvious to anyone paying attention that her war vote was purely to give the impression that she wouldn't be perceived as weak. If she wanted to run as a feminist, she wouldn't have needed warmongering on her resume to make her appeal to voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC