Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

my $.02 on VEEP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 10:20 PM
Original message
my $.02 on VEEP
In baseball there is a role called "bench coach." It typically is a former manager, long-time baseball guy who's been there, done that. He gets paid to sit next to the manager in the dugout and whisper in his ear. Stuff like, "hit-and-run", "better go get that pitcher" etc.


Despite the appallingly horrific results, that is what cheney was/is to bush. bush had no idea what being president entailed - still doesn't. cheney was the bench coach from hell.

But if you are talking about decent people, well, the model is a good one. Obama will be a fine president. He seems to have good instincts. In baseball parlance, the players will respond to his leadership, the media will respect him, the fans will come out to the games. He could use a bench coach though. Not someone to "balance the ticket." He needs a bench coach more than he needs a running mate.

What this country desperately needs is strong, experienced leadership to pull the fat out of the fire. No discredit to Obama - the job is far bigger than any one person. I have a number of names in mind; not going to throw them out here. I am not trying to promote an individual or start a "he voted for xxx so we can't have him as VEEP" war. But the search should focus on what they can bring to the job of VEEP/confidant, not what they bring to the ticket.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. I for one am tired of the home-state analyses
which no longer seem relevant to me. By that logic, Clinton shouldn't have picked Gore, Bush shouldn't have picked Cheney (small guaranteed red state) etc. Gore was a good partner for Clinton, Cheney was a good puppetmaster/tutor/benchcoach for Bush.

Any hints in your sig line ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. well, to paraphrase Obama
Joe would be on anyone's short list

So would several others.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Cheney
Cheney was (is) our President; he came to town with an agenda, and has largely seen it executed. I don't think there would be any such fear with an Obama/Clinton ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clear Blue Sky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Cheney brought lots of experience.
He was in Congress and in several administrations. He had the gravitas and experience that Bush didn't have.

Obama needs someone with that type of experience. Two come to mind: Richardson (House, UN, Governor) and Cohen (House, Senate, SecDef). I'm sure there are others...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Let's just make sure we don't have a DLC candidate or a Trojan Horse . . .
as Liebermann would have been --- !!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC