Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'd like to see Obama adopt Hillary's health care plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:39 PM
Original message
I'd like to see Obama adopt Hillary's health care plan
Edited on Fri May-16-08 02:17 PM by FatDave
With Hillary's blessing, of course. I think hers was the better plan, even if only just a bit, and it would be a nice show of unity. It would give Clinton and many of her supporters a great opening to rally around Obama.

On Edit: Please bear in mind that I'm mostly saying this because I believe, as others have pointed out downthread, that presidential health plans are largely meaningless because legislation is the job of congress. I'm mostly suggesting that it would be good strategy for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. If he's going to start changing positions, I'd rather him adopt Kucinich's plan
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. word
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. As would I, but right now...
I think it would do the party good for him to adopt a Clinton policy. Single-payer will be awesome, and we'll get there someday (hopefully someday soon).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDoorbellRang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
22. Indeed, yes
I know he's planning on a televised round table discussion after he is elected with all parties at the table. That means we'll hear the insurance companies make their case for staying on as the middleman between Americans and health care. I'm hoping those who want universal health care vs universal health insurance will shred the insurance companies' arguments right there on tv for all to see, and help sway the public to universal healthcare, approved by Obama as the only logical choice.

Hey, I got lots of dreams for America. You might even say I have the audacity to hope. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
32. Just about to post the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. That is for Congress to decide.
Heathcare is FIRMLY in their territory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. I know it is. I just think it would be a nice gesture.
I've said several times here that the Clinton/Obama/Edwards health care plans are all closer to each other than any one of them would be compared to the version that eventually comes out of congress. Presidents don't really write legislation.

I just think it would be nice if some Hillary hold outs could say, well, OK, that makes the difference I was waiting for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'd like to see him adopt Kucinich's health care plan!
Single payer is the way to go, IMHO...

All the other plans pander to the god-awful so-called health insurance companies...

x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. HR676
Of the other three ... Edwards' stood the best chance of BECOMING HR 676.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Unity would be to give her the VP slot, and after GE, give her HC again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
29. She'll never be the VP
If she were Hillary 1993, putting her in charge of health care might be an option. But now that she takes more money from health care lobbyists than anyone, and is pushing Mandatory Corporate Romneycare, even that isn't possible.

There's no excuse for this country not to have as good or better than the rest of the world when it comes to health care. Taking the profit motive out of the equation is the only way that will happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. We need the Kucinich plan. Health CARE not health insurance. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. Forced health insurance is a disaster
People who lean right will freak out over the requirement, working income people will soon figure out that she wasn't offering guaranteed health care, just a guaranteed monthly bill. He needs to stay far far away from mandated health insurance and lame-ass tax credits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. I want REALl universal health care....
not mandatory health insurance.

Kucinich has the superior plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm sure the health care industry does too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'd prefer he adopt Kucinich's plan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. I wouldn't
It's a massive giveaway to the health care companies and the mandate concept doesn't make sense. It should be a basic right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. Congress will be deciding the plan
The President can propose whatever he wants...Congress will bend it to their will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbert Donating Member (548 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yeah, let's feed the pockets of the health insurance companies
just so that they can deny my next claim! As someone that had a claim denied before, I hate HRC's idea for health care.

Kucinich FTW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
17. I don't agree with mandates though...
I don't like the mandates in obama's plan and I think Hillary's mandates are a huge, fatal flaw
in her plan.

How can you mandate that a single mother living paycheck to paycheck--come up with an extra $250 a month
for healthcare?

It's just not going to happen.

I'm not trying to start a fight here, but just because you mandate that someone buy health insurance,
doesn't mean that they will be covered. You can mandate that everyone landscape their front yard, but
if people don't have the money--you're not really giving them a beautiful, landscaped yard--now are you?

With grocery and gas prices sky rocketing--times are really tough. I can't imagine a mandate working.

I actually liked that Obama focused on cutting costs more--instead of mandating. A mandate
does nothing. Cutting costs may get some more people into the system--but not all of them.

Both plans are a decent first step, but I disagree that Hillary's plan was superior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Wasn't there talk of government assistance for low incomes?
The idea of mandates, also proposed by Edwards, was to force the rich to pay in and be unable to opt out. I don't think anybody was going to send collection agencies after single moms.

Crap, I didn't mean to ignite the whole health care debate again. I'm gonna go edit my OP a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
18. I would like to see THE DEMOCRATS adopt Canada's health care plan
what's under discussion so far in this election season is nothing but mandatory insurance. No plan on offer, so far, does anything to curb the raging thirst for profits and limitation of service under traditional insurance or HMO plans. Without cost reduction such as that achieved in Britain and Canada or even France, NO PLAN is viable in the long run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
20. Not me. I don't want to see
struggling families having their paychecks docked. It is better to start out with a decent plan and work up to single payer. If this plan had been implemented 15 years ago we might actually have single payer for everyone now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heather MC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
21. I don't think anyone's plan addresses the real problem of our "Healthcare system"...
Edited on Fri May-16-08 02:31 PM by Heather MC
We are being OVERCHARGED to pay for over payed employees. My girl friend works for Kaiser, her Boss makes $400,000 a year. Now I am not against people making money, but I don't think I or the rest of us peons, she be charged based on someones over priced salaryies.

Also, Hospital stays, Why does it cost 25,000 just to stay in a hospital bed for 2 days in NO VA.
This is just wrong. In order to really impliment an affordable Universal Healthcare plan, Hospitals, Insurances companies, and doctors, have to be switched to a non-profit organization.

I don't think garanteeing everyone gets "Affordable" insurance is going to be enough. They have to bring cost down, before they can even begin to put a Healthcare plan in place.

I do believe Obama will be more willing to review successful plans all over the world and create one that will work in the US. The problem, no one likes you to cut into their profits in our capitalistic society, but unless their is a sincere effort made to lower these over-inflated healthcare prices, no universal plan will work. And we will have the same problem. Greedy people making decision that effect everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
23. I'd like him to adopt Hillary's ORIGINAL health care plan
or better yet, Kucinnich's!

We need a national health care system. Forcing people to buy private health insurance? Not so much.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
24. Fuck that! Hillary's plan is a neocon wet dream. Forcing people to buy health insurance from .....
HMO's and lining the pockets of insurance CEO's would make rethugs the happiest people on earth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. So what does Obama's do differently?
Oh yeah, it allows you to go uncovered- screwing up the risk pool and creating more adverse selection problems.

As a matter of responsible public policy, neither of these plans does anything to solve the fundamental problems with the nations fragmented and dysfunctional healthcare "system."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Obama's plan gives you the choice, but I agree that it is far from a solution. Neither plan .......
is truly universal. I just don't see the sense in forcing people to buy something that they can't afford in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Supposedly, there are affordability provisions
but as we agree that all three (including Edward's plan) are essentially bogus solutions, no real sense in splitting hairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
25. I as an Obama Supporter ,,,Agree,
But being realistic, not even Hillary's plan would pass Congress intact, parts of it would be changed, compromises reached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
26. As long as you are dreaming, why not have him adopt Kucinich's
universal health care plan?

If the president, assuming Obama will be the next president, doesn't take a firm stand, nothing worthwhile will get through Congress.

Sad prediction: no universal health care by 2012 and the military industrial complex continues to prosper.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
27. Another vote for HR 676 here
Mandatory Corporate Romneycare is not the answer. Take the corporations out of the equation, and do what every other civilized nation on the planet does.

We should be embarrassed that CUBA has better health care than the US :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
33. ## DON'T DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v4.1
==================



This week is our second quarter 2008 fund drive. Democratic Underground is
a completely independent website. We depend on donations from our members
to cover our costs. Whatever you do, do not click the link below!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC