|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Aloha Spirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:15 PM Original message |
Poll question: Is there even a remote possibility that Senator Clinton can win* BEFORE August 25th? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bad Thoughts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
1. Yes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aloha Spirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:19 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. OH man, I would love to see a constitutional amendment passed in less than three months! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bad Thoughts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 05:03 PM Response to Reply #3 |
31. Apparently, anything can happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aloha Spirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 05:08 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. That's what I'm talking about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gore1FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
2. her chance of winning on or after August 25th is also 0 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
4. Maybe "winning" for her means making sure Obama loses... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aloha Spirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. I just wonder if voters in the remaining contests would support her if they thought that her only |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 05:21 PM Response to Reply #5 |
41. As someone who just voted last week, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aloha Spirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 05:24 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. I don't know, who could possibly step in and be the dark horse? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 05:54 PM Response to Reply #42 |
48. Gore is the obvious, strongest, choice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
6. She has a 50% chance of winning the nomination. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hawkeye-X (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:28 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. No she doesn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Yes, she does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aloha Spirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:31 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. What do you figure are Senator Clinton's odds if you use the definition of winning that I provided? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:32 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. She cannot win before the convention. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aloha Spirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:33 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Okay, thanks for clarifying that. Why do you say she can't win before the convention? Just curious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:35 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Because superdelegates can change their minds on the convention floor. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aloha Spirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:36 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. So you're saying superdelegates will not change their minds before then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:38 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. It's a more organized format for the SDs to change their minds at the convention. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aloha Spirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:41 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. I see. Thanks! I agree that if the SDs switch en masse, it will most likely be at the Convention. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:50 PM Response to Reply #12 |
23. But she can LOSE before the convention. We all know she can, because she did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aloha Spirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:28 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. How do you figure? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 06:05 PM Response to Reply #8 |
51. That poster thinks they're being reasonable, by allowing that anyone BESIDES Queen Inevitable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:29 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aloha Spirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:45 PM Response to Reply #10 |
21. haha yes, I guess it is 50%. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:48 PM Response to Reply #6 |
22. She's already LOST the nomination. It's a fact. Get over it already. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quaker bill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 05:05 PM Response to Reply #6 |
33. only if they decide it by coin toss |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aloha Spirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 05:10 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. You could say there are three possible outcomes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 05:50 PM Response to Reply #33 |
47. If this were a truly even race I'd actually be all in favor of that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quaker bill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 06:03 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. It is the only way she gets to 50:50 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 06:04 PM Response to Reply #6 |
50. Hey, look! That leprechaun is fucking that Unicorn! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
15. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
18. There are 40 SDs up for grabs. Obama needs 10. Clinton needs 200. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
19. Before or after even if Obama implodes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:57 PM Response to Reply #19 |
29. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ButterflyBlood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
24. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
25. Yo, Beat: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aloha Spirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:55 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Oh no! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 05:40 PM Response to Reply #26 |
43. Thank you-cThat's EXACTLY why I chose that pic to label for this purpose! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
27. Other: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aloha Spirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:57 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Well, what if you use the definition of winning that I included in the poll? Just curious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 05:16 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. I disagree with that definition of "winning." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aloha Spirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 05:20 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. I agree, it's not fair that the field was narrowed so quickly. You just made me think of something! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 05:47 PM Response to Reply #40 |
46. Some things that would help: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aloha Spirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
28. I am glad that the "other" option was not for naught. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quaker bill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
32. Greater than zero |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aloha Spirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 05:12 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. 0.0001%... you may be right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
36. NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aloha Spirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 05:16 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. If voters knew that Hillary can't win* except at Denver, do you think they'd still vote for her? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intaglio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
44. August 2016 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greguganus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
45. Please add "Fuck no because she is a heartless sack of dog excrement." n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-25-08 06:57 PM Response to Reply #45 |
52. Stop insulting dog excrement like that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 13th 2024, 04:46 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC