PretzelWarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 05:04 PM
Original message |
--------->>>>>WOW. Check out Electoral Vote changes! |
|
This is the number of electoral votes per state ADDED or subtracted. Check out the ones that are gaining. Good news for 2010, 2012, 2014, etc...............WOOOHOOOO
California 8 Florida 6 Texas 5 Arizona 3 Georgia 3 North Carolina 2 Colorado 1 Nevada 1 Virginia 1 Washington 1 Alabama 0 Alaska 0 Arkansas 0 0 Delaware 0 D.C. 0 0 Hawaii 0 Idaho 0 0 Maine 0 0 Maryland 0 Minnesota 0 0 Missouri 0 Nebraska 0 New Hampshire 0 0 New Mexico 0 North Dakota 0 0 Oregon 0 Rhode Island 0 0 South Carolina 0 South Dakota 0 Tennessee 0 Utah 0 0 Vermont 0 Wyoming 0 Connecticut -1 Indiana -1 Iowa -1 Kansas -1 Kentucky -1 Louisiana -1 Massachusetts -1 Mississippi -1 Montana -1 New Jersey -1 Oklahoma -1 West Virginia -1 Wisconsin -1 Illinois -3 Michigan -3 Ohio -3 Pennsylvania -4 New York -5
|
Muttocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 05:08 PM
Response to Original message |
1. is this based on next census adjustment? New York :( |
PretzelWarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. no. that is from 1980 to 2000. There will be more adjustments after |
|
2010 census. So....we'll see. New York is losing influence but at least they are still a reliable large block of votes.
|
Muttocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. I just hate the electoral college because my pres. vote isn't worth as much |
|
and with NY's population loss, will be worth even less.
|
PretzelWarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. I can see why it's reasonable. it's all about apportionment based on population |
|
so each person's vote should count in at the same rate.
I know what you mean. But you may find that with rural voters you could end up in a worse situation as Democrat if it was popular vote only.
|
Muttocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. I just wish my vote counted as much as a Wyoming GOPer's does. nt |
PretzelWarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
Muttocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Electoral votes are higher per population in the small states |
|
just like they're overrepresented in Congress by having 2 Senators.
Plus the winner-take-all that makes votes in strong red or blue states matter less than swing states (Nebraska and Maine do split EVs a bit)
|
PretzelWarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. the senate part I agree about |
Muttocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. How do the 538 electoral votes get divided among the States? |
|
"The number of electoral votes allotted to each State corresponds to the number of Representatives and Senators that each State sends to Congress" http://archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/faq.html#number
|
GetTheRightVote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message |
9. popular vote should elect our next president so we are truly one for one when voting |
PretzelWarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
12. good point. good point. |
leeann1317
(61 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message |
11. This isn't good news for us. The EV seems to be swining higher in Rethug states. |
Motown_Johnny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 05:30 PM
Response to Original message |
|
OK, CA is good news
TX isn't
FL, who knows? Same with OH.
MI, NY, PA, and IL are all bad news
sorry
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 11th 2024, 01:06 PM
Response to Original message |