uppityperson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 10:09 PM
Original message |
Holy Fucking Shit!!!! And that is going on NYT's conservative numbers |
uppityperson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I'm cynical, refused to let my hopes get up, but dayamn, we won. |
|
omg om gom gom gomgomgomgmgogmomogmomgogmgmg
:cry: :cry: :cry:
|
Kindigger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I may be getting tired but... |
|
what's up with those #'s for Utah on the far right side at the bottom?
|
uppityperson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. No #'s yet, but go to the Utah page...(link here) and look at the map |
|
http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/states/utah.htmlLooks like they haven't entered the numbers yet, but colors tell. I said I would not get my hopes up too high but o.m.g.
|
Kindigger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
I wasn't even thinking about them being 'real time' numbers.
And to think I have to stay up, and on the phone to keep my friend in Montana company until it goes blue. Argghhhhh:bounce:
|
wordpix
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-04-08 10:20 PM
Response to Original message |
4. LANDSLIDE. Now even the repukes know how irrelevant they are |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 05:02 PM
Response to Original message |